·Basic Research··Current Issue· ·Achieve· ·Search
Articles· ·Online
Submission· ·About IJO·
Anti-inflammatory
effect of Heliotropium indicum Linn on lipopolysaccharide-induced uveitis
in New Zealand white rabbits
Samuel Kyei1,2, George
Asumeng Koffuor1,3, Paul Ramkissoon1, Elvis Ofori Ameyaw4,
Emmanuel Akomanin Asiamah5
1Discipline of Optometry, School of Health Sciences, College
of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Private Bag X54001, Durban 4000, South Africa
2Department of Optometry, School of
Allied Health Sciences, University of Cape Coast, PMB, Cape Coast, Ghana
3Department of Pharmacology, Faculty
of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Health Sciences, Kwame
Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, PMB, Kumasi, Ghana
4Department of Biomedical and Forensic
Sciences, School of Allied Health Science, University of Cape Coast, PMB, Cape
Coast, Ghana
5Department of Pathology, Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital, P. O
Box 1934, Kumasi, Ghana
Correspondence to: Samuel Kyei. Department
of Optometry, School of Allied Health Sciences, University
of Cape Coast, PMB, Cape Coast, Ghana. skyei@ucc.edu.gh
Received:
2015-11-05
Accepted: 2016-02-14
Abstract
AIM: To investigate the
anti-inflammatory effect of an aqueous whole plant extract of Heliotropium
indicum (HIE) on endotoxin-induced uveitis in New Zealand white rabbits.
METHODS: Clinical signs of uveitis including
flares, iris hyperemia and miosis, were sought for and scored in 1.0 mg/kg lipopolysaccharide
(LPS)
-induced
uveitic rabbits treated orally with HIE (30-300 mg/kg), prednisolone (30
mg/kg),
or normal saline (10 mL/kg). The number of polymorphonuclear
neutrophils infiltrating, the protein concentration, as well as levels of tumor
necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), and monocyte
chemmoattrant protein-1 (MCP-1) in the aqueous humor after the various
treatments were also determined. A histopathological study of the anterior
uveal was performed.
RESULTS: The extract and
prednisolone-treatment significantly reduced (P≤0.001) both the
clinical scores of inflammation (1.0-1.8 compared to 4.40±0.40 in the normal
saline-treated rabbits) and inflammatory cells infiltration. The level of
protein, and the concentrations of TNF-α, PGE2 and MCP-1 in the
aqueous humor were also significantly reduced (P≤0.001).
Histopathological studies showed normal uveal morphology in the HIE and
prednisolone-treated rabbits while normal saline-treated rabbits showed marked
infiltration of inflammatory cells.
CONCLUSION: The HIE exhibits anti-inflammatory effect
on LPS-induced uveitis possibly by reducing the production of pro-inflammatory
mediators.
KEYWORDS: monocyte chemotatic protein-1; prostaglandin E2; tumor necrosis factor-α;
polymorphonuclear
neutrophil; iris hyperemia; prednisolone; heliotropium; uveitis
Citation: Kyei S, Koffuor GA, Ramkissoon P, Ameyaw EO, Asiamah
EA. Anti-inflammatory effect of Heliotropium
indicum Linn on lipopolysaccharide-induced uveitis in New Zealand white
rabbits. Int J Ophthalmol
2016;9(4):528-535
INTRODUCTION
There are several unverified traditional health care
practices in Ghana and elsewhere in Africa. One of such is the traditional use
of Heliotropium indicum (H. indicum) in the treatment of several ailments
of the eye. Fluids from the leaves of this plant are squeezed directly into the
eye; but whole plant is taken orally as dietary ingredient, in managing local
ocular inflammations and postpartum inflammatory reaction respectively. The
popularity of H. indicum in
traditional medicines across the globe has led to several scientific
investigations into its pharmacological activity, some of which has resulted in
the isolation of some alkaloids of pharmacological importance. Notable among
these alkaloids are indicine, indicine-N-oxide, acetyl-indicine, indicinine,
heleurine, heliotrine, supinine, supinidine and lindelofidine[1-6]. One of these bioactive compounds,
indicine-N-oxide,
is well known for its anti-cancer property.
Notwithstanding the growing interest of the scientific
community in bio-prospecting for potential pharmaceuticals in H. indicum
in managing various systems disorders, its traditional use as an antidote to
ocular disorders such as uveitis remains largely unconfirmed[7-8]. This study therefore
sought to evaluate the observed traditional use of H. indicum
in the management of ocular inflammatory
disorders[7,9]
in rabbits as an initial step to
validate its potential usefulness as an anti-inflammatory agent. It is worthy
to note that previous preclinical studies have indicated its anti-inflammatory
effect in generalized inflammation however, its intraocular anti-inflammatory
effect is yet to be established[10]. A number of animal models have been developed for in depth preclinical
studies useful in guiding the development of novel therapeutic approaches to
combat the menace of anterior uveitis, a potentially blinding eye disorder[11]. Popular among these models
regarding anterior uveitis is endotoxin-induced uveitis[12-13]. This model seems
ideal as it typifies intraocular inflammation in humans i.e. the exudation of flares,
inflammatory cells and preponderance of inflammatory mediators leading to pain,
photophobia and reduction in visual acuity[14]. These
pathophysiological changes lead to symptoms worrisome enough to victims of
uveitis causing them to seek desperate measures such as self medicating with
unapproved herbals. Even though there is a low prevalence of uveitis group of
disease worldwide (estimated at 0.73%) and accounts for only 0.8% outpatients
visits[15-16], it affects people in
their prime (averagely 30.7y). This makes it economically important due to it
far reaching consequence on productivity and the individual sufferer’s autonomy.
Improperly managed anterior uveitis could lead to complications such as
cataract, secondary glaucoma and macular edema[17].
However,
conventional pharmacological management with steroid (the mainstay
treatment) is bedeviled with a lot adverse effects equaling the complications
of the disease entity[18-19]. Adjunctive therapy such as cycloplegics and
mydratics are also not without adverse concerns such as induction of acute
angle closure glaucoma and chemotatic neutrophil response despite their useful
role in stabilization and restoration of the integrity of the blood-aqueous
barrier[20-21]. There is therefore no doubt that alternatives and
other unverified traditional practices with botanicals need to be explored to
broaden treatment horizon for uveitis. Unlike the previous studies, this study aimed at
evaluating the anti-inflammatory effect of aqueous extract of H. indicum (HIE) in endotoxin-induced uveitis, a specific intraocular inflammatory model and to predict its possible
mechanism of action.
MATERIALS
AND METHODS
Plant
Collection H. indicum was collected in November 2012, from the University
of Cape Coast botanical gardens (5.1036° N, 1.2825° W), Cape Coast, Ghana. The
plant was identified and authenticated by a botanist at the School of
Biological Sciences, College Agricultural and Natural Sciences, University of
Cape Coast, Cape Coast, Ghana, where a voucher specimen (Specimen number: 4873)
has been deposited.
Preparation of the Heliotropium
Indicum Aqueous Extract Whole plants of H. indicum were washed thoroughly with tap water
and shade-dried. The dry plants were milled into coarse powder by a hammer mill
(Schutte Buffalo, New York, NY, USA). One
kilogram of the plant powder was mixed with one liter of water. The mixture was
Soxhlet extracted at 80°C, for 24h. The aqueous
extract was freeze-dried (Hull freeze-dryer/lyophilizer 140 SQ, Warminster, PA, USA). The powder obtained (yield 12.2%), was labeled
HIE, and stored at a temperature of 4°C. This was reconstituted in normal
saline to the desired concentration for dosing in this study.
Experimental Animals and
Husbandry Ten-week-old New Zealand
rabbits of either sex, weighing 1±0.2 kg were kept in the Animal House of the
School of Biological Sciences, University of Cape Coast, Ghana, for use in this
study. The animals were housed singly in aluminum cages (34×47×18-cm3) with soft wood shavings
as bedding, under ambient laboratory conditions (temperature 28°C±2°C, relative
humidity 60%-70%, and a normal light-dark cycle). They were fed
with normal commercial pellet diet (Agricare Ltd., Kumasi, Ghana) and had
access to water ad libitum.
Ethical and Biosafety Considerations The study protocols were approved by
the Institutional Review Board on Animal Experimentation, Faculty of Pharmacy
and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and
Technology, Kumasi, Ghana (Ethical clearance number: FPPS/PCOL/0030/2013). All
activities performed during the studies conformed to accepted principles for
laboratory animal use and care (EU directive of 1986: 86/609/EEC), and
Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology Statement for Use of
Animals in Ophthalmic and Vision Research. Biosafety guidelines for protection
of personnel in the laboratory were observed.
Preliminary Phytochemical
Screening Using standard procedures, described by Harborne[22] and Kujur et
al[23],
preliminary phytochemical screening was performed on HIE.
Drugs and Chemicals Used Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) (Calbiochem, EMD Chemicals, San Diego, CA,
USA) an endotoxin from Escherichia coli was used to induce uveitis.
Bicinchoninic acid (BCA) protein assay reagent kit (Pierce, Rockford, IL. USA)
was used to determine total protein in the aqueous humour. Prednisolone
(M&G Pharmaceuticals Ltd., Accra, Ghana) was the reference anti-inflammatory
agent in this study. Tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) ELISA kit (Genorise
Scientific, Inc, USA), prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) ELISA
kit (Wuhan Huamei Biotech Co., Ltd., Wuhan, China), monocyte chemotactic
protein 1 (MCP-1) (Biotang Inc., USA) were used in assaying for marker of
intraocular inflammation. Chloroform was used to euthanize the animals and normal saline solution (Claris lifesciences limited, Chacharwadi, India)
was the vehicle in which other drugs were dissolved.
Induction of Anterior
Uveitis All rabbits were examined for clinical signs of inflammation prior to
the induction of ocular inflammation to rule out any pre-existing inflammatory
disorder. To induce uveitis, rabbits were injected with 1.0 mg/kg LPS through the marginal ear vein[24]. Two hours later, the
anterior segment of the eye was evaluated by the diffuse and conical beam
illumination technique using a slit lamp. Observation of infiltration of cells,
flares, iris hyperemia, and miosis was indicative of uveitis.
Effect of Heliotropium Indicum
Aqueous Extract on Lipopolysaccharide-induced Uveitis LPS-induced
uveitic rabbits were grouped into five (n=5), labelled I-V, and treated
as follows: Groups I, II, and III were treated with 30, 100 or 300 mg/kg HIE respectively (selection of doses was based on reports from
previous studies[25]).
Groups IV and V were treated with 30 mg/kg
prednisolone and 10 mL/kg
normal saline respectively. All treatments were administered orally by means of
an oral gavage and dosing was done once daily. Eighteen hours post-LPS
injection, both eyes of the rabbits were examined again for vasodilation, and
exudation of cells and proteins (clinical signs of uveitis) using the slit lamp
(Lombart Instrument Company, Norfolk, VA, USA).
The extent of uveitis per treatment groups was given clinical scores. The animals were euthanized and the aqueous humor from the anterior
chamber of both eyes collected into sterile Eppendorf tubes using a 25 gauge
needle. The aqueous humour was assessed for polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMNs), total
proteins, MCP-1, PGE2, TNF-α.
Clinical Score of Uveitis The scoring was performed as follows: iris
hyperemia/redness (0-2), flare (0-1), cells in the anterior chamber (0-2),
hypopyon/pus in the anterior chamber (0-1), miosis (0-1). The maximum
practicable score was 7[26].
Polymorphonuclear Neutrophil Count Small quantities of a 1:10 dilution (Diluent: Türk’s stain solution)
of the aqueous humour collected was from the various treatment groups were
pipetted onto the counting chamber of the Improved Neubauer Haemocytometer
(Depth 0.1 mm, Area: 1/400 mm2;
Yancheng Cordial Lab Glassware Co. Ltd.,
Jiangsu
Province, China). PMNs were
counted from four “large” squares (volume: 0.4 mm3) using a Ceti
magnum-T/trinocular microscope for fluorescence (Medline Scientific limited,
UK), under objective magnification of 40×. The number of PMNs was
determined per mm3 of aqueous humour (taking into account the
dilution dynamics).
Determination of Total Protein
Concentration A Bicinchoninic Acid (BCA) protein assay
kit (Pierce, Rockford, IL, USA) was used to determine the total
protein concentration in the aqueous humour. Fifty microliter (50 μL)
quantities of aqueous humour collected from the various treatment groups as
well as standard bovine serum albumin (BSA) were introduced into well on a
96-well microplate with a micropipette. A 200 μL quantity of working reagent,
constituted according to the manufacturer’s instructions, was mixed thoroughly
with the content of each well and shaken for 30s. The microplate and its
content was then incubated at 37°C for 30min and allowed to cool to room temperature.
Absorbances of the mixtures were measured at 562 nm using an URIT-660 microplate reader (URIT
Medical Electronic Co., Ltd, Guangxi, China). Each determination was done in
triplicate.
Determination of Monocyte Chemotactic Protein 1
Concentration The concentration of MCP-1 in the
aqueous humour of each sample from the
treatment groups was determined using a double-antibody sandwich ELISA
kit per manufacturer’s the procedure. All samples were assayed in duplicate and
on the same plate. The detection limits for this assay was 15-4000 pg/mL. In
brief, the samples were loaded along with the standards, and the
biotinylated-MCP-1 antibody was then added. The wells were washed to remove
unbound antibody-enzyme reagent, after which tetramethyl-benzidine (TMB) substrate
was added. The addition of the TMB substrate produced blue coloration upon
catalysis by horseradish
peroxidase (HRP) enzyme. The reaction was terminated by adding the
acidic stop solution which changed the solution from blue to yellow.
Absorbances of the mixtures were measured at 450 nm using an URIT-660
microplate reader (URIT Medical Electronic Co., Ltd., Guangxi, China). The concentration of MCP-1 was calculated using a
standard curve. Each determination was done in triplicate.
Determination of Prostaglandin E2 Levels The ELISA kit had a minimum detectable dose of
rabbit PGE2 of less than 7.8 pg/mL. The standards or samples were
prepared according to the manufacturer’s instruction which were pipette into
the microtiter plate wells with a biotin-conjugated polyclonal antibody
preparation specific for rabbit PGE2. Subsequently, avidin
conjugated to HRP was introduced into each well and incubated. Following this,
TMB (3,3',5,5' tetramethyl-benzidine) substrate solution was added to each
well. Only wells which contain PGE2, biotin-conjugated antibody and
enzyme-conjugated avidin showed a change in color.
The enzyme-substrate reaction was stopped by
the adding 50 µL of sulphuric acid solution. After which the color intensity
was measured spectrophotometrically at a wavelength of 450 nm. The
concentration of PGE2 in the samples was then determined by
comparing the optical densities of the samples to the standard curve. Each determination was
done in triplicate.
Determination of
Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha Levels
in Aqueous Humour A commercial ELISA kit for the estimation of TNF-α in the rabbit
aqueous humour (detection range: 31-2000 pg/mL; sensitivity: 0.8 pg/mL) was
used. It employs a quantitative sandwich enzyme immunoassay technique with
improved performance owing to its biotin-streptavidine chemistry. Standards and
samples (100 µL) were pipetted into a
pre-coated microplate with antibody specific for rabbit TNF-α in which any
TNF-α present was bound by the immobilized antibody. After washing away the unbound
antibody substances, a detection antibody specific for rabbit TNF-α was added
to the wells. A detection reagent was then added which led to color development
in proportion to the amount of TNF-α bound in the initial step. The color
development was stopped and the intensity of the color was measured at 540 nm
using an URIT-660 microplate reader (URIT Medical Electronic Co., Ltd., Guangxi, China). All determinations were in triplicate.
Histopatholgical Assessment The enucleated eyes of animals from the treatment
groups were fixed in 4% phosphate-buffered paraformaldehyde, and embedded in
paraffin. Sections of the anterior uvea of the treated (HIE, prednisolone or
normal saline) rabbit were made and stained with hematoxylin and eosin[26] and fixed
on glass slides for microscopic examination at the Pathology Department of the
Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital, Kumasi, Ghana for histopathological assessment
by a specialist pathologist.
Statistic Analysis Data
obtained for control, test, and reference drug effects were analyzed by one-way
analysis of variance followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test using
GraphPad Prism (version 5.03; GraphPad, La Jolla, CA, USA). Values were expressed as the mean±standard error
of the mean. P≤0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.
RESULTS
Phytochemical Screening Preliminary phytochemistry showed that flavonoids, saponins,
cyanogenic glycosides, sterol, tannins and alkaloids were present in HIE (Table
1).
Table
1 Results obtained after preliminary phytochemical screening of HIE
Phytochemical
tested for |
Results obtained |
Anthraquinones |
- |
Tannins |
+ |
Flavonoids |
+ |
Alkaloids |
+ |
Sterols |
+ |
Glycosides |
+ |
Saponnins |
+ |
Triterpenoids |
- |
+: Present;
-: Absent.
.
Effect of Heliotropium Indicum
Aqueous Extract on Lipopolysaccharide-induced Uveitis There was remarkable infiltration of cells and
flares (protein exudates) in the aqueous humour, as well as intense iris
hyperemia and vasodilation (clinical score: 4.40±0.40) of uveitic rabbits treated
with normal saline. However, HIE- and prednisolone-treated groups showed no
infiltration, or significantly reduced (P≤0.001)
infiltration of cells and flares, iris hyperemia and vasodilation; reducing
clinical scores to between 1.0 to 1.8 (Figure 1).
Figure 1 The clinical score of
inflammation in LPS-induced uveitic rabbits treated with 30, 100 and 300 mg/kg HIE, 30 mg/kg prednisolone (PRED),
and 10 mL/kg normal saline (CTRL)
aP≤0.001 (n=5), ANOVA followed by Dunnet’s post hoc test.
Polymorphonuclear
Neutrophil Count and Total Protein Concentration There was significant (P≤0.001)
reduction of PMNs and protein exudation into the aqueous humour of the HIE and
prednisolone-treated animals compared to the normal saline-treated group
(Figure 2A, 2B).
Figure 2 The effect of 30, 100 and
300 mg/kg HIE, 30 mg/kg prednisolone (PRED),
and 10 mL/kg normal saline (CTRL) on: (A) PMN
count, (B) total protein concentration in the aqueous humour of the eyes of
LPS-induced uveitic rabbits aP≤0.001
(n=5), ANOVA followed by Dunnet’s post hoc test.
Monocyte Chemotactic
Protein 1, Prostaglandin E2, Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha Levels in
Aqueous Humour Treatment with HIE or prednisolone
caused anti-inflammation as it significantly (P≤0.001) reduced the levels of MCP-1, PGE2, TNF-α,
in the aqueous humour nevertheless the normal saline-treated rabbits had higher
concentrations of these chemokine and cytokines in their aqueous humour
(Figures 3, 4 and 5).
Figure 3 The effect of 30, 100 and
300 mg/kg HIE, 30 mg/kg prednisolone (PRED),
and 10 mL/kg normal saline (CTRL) on MCP-1 in
the aqueous humour of LPS-induced uveitis rabbits
aP≤0.001 (n=5), ANOVA followed by Dunnet’s post hoc test.
Figure 4 The effect of 30, 100 and
300 mg/kg HIE, 30 mg/kg prednisolone (PRED), and
10 mL/kg normal saline (CTRL) on PGE2 in the
aqueous humour of LPS-induced uveitis rabbits aP≤0.001
(n=5), ANOVA followed by Dunnet’s post hoc test.
Figure 5 The effect of 30, 100 and
300 mg/kg HIE, 30 mg/kg prednisolone (PRED),
and 10 mL/kg normal saline (CTRL) on TNF-α
level in the aqueous humour of LPS-induced uveitis rabbits
aP≤0.001 (n=5), ANOVA followed by Dunnet’s post hoc test.
Histopathological
Assessment The
histopathological assessment did not reveal any signs of inflammation in
anterior uvea in rabbits treated with HIE or prednisolone. However, there were
histopathological signs of inflammation characterized by neutrophil
infiltration into the uveal tissues in the normal saline treated rabbits
(Figure 6).
Figure 6 Photomicrographs of anterior uvea
A: Marked infiltration of neutrophils in iris tissue of 10 mL/kg
normal
saline treatment (Control) rabbit; B: 30 mg/kg HIE treated
rabbit with normal histology of
anterior uvea and well defined margins; C: 100 mg/kg HIE treated rabbit with normal histology of the anterior chamber
angle and uveal; D: 300 mg/kg HIE treated with normal histology of the anterior uvea and no
inflammatory cells. N: Neutrophils. E: 30 mg/kg prednisolone treated
with normal arhitecture of the
anterior uveal tissue.
DISCUSSION
In this study, the
anti-inflammatory property of an aqueous whole
plant HIE
was studied in
lipopolysaccharide-induced uveitis in rabbits. The lipid A portion of LPS, a component of a gram negative bacterial cell
wall, is responsible for the explicit uveitogenic tendency in rodents[27]. Injection of LPS results in the
breakdown of the blood-aqueous barrier via
a series of mechanisms beginning with the activity of the systemically injected
LPS on local macrophages which in turn provoke the production of
pro-inflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α and interleukin-1[28]. Chemokines such as MCP-1/CCL2 are released
in response to signals from these pro-inflammatory cytokines where they
regulate trafficking of inflammatory cells such as monocytes and neutrophils
into the anterior uvea[29]. Under the auspices cytokines, macrophages
and neutrophils secrete prostaglandin
E2 and nitric oxide, which actually causes the breakdown of the
blood-aqueous barrier leading to the observable infiltration of cells and flare
(protein exudation) in the anterior chamber during the clinical stage of the
disease process[11,30]. The noticeable miosis especially in
rabbit with uveitis can be explained by the release substance P from the
peripheral nerve endings in reaction to deleterious stimuli[31].
Results from this study indicate
that the aqueous whole plant HIE
has potent anti-inflammatory effect in endotoxin-induced uveitis which gives
credence to its traditional use in managing inflammatory eye disorders[7,9]. TNF-α is one of the earliest cytokine
involved in the pathogenesis of LPS-induced
uveitis. Other researchers have reported that symptoms of Behcet’s disease
uveitis could be relieved by anti-TNF-α antibody treatment[32]. It is an
established fact that the transcription of TNF-α is under the influence of
nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-κB) and a positive loop exist between amplification
of cytokine cascade during inflammation (i.e. TNF-α)
and activation of NF-κB[33-34]. In this study HIE presumably down-regulated TNF-α in the aqueous
humor, by obstructing the generation of the positive loop between TNF-α and
NF-κB.
MCP-1
which is also transcriptionally controlled by NF-κB and protease activated
receptor 1 (PAR1) signaling[35]. It has been found be an important inflammatory
marker both in human and animal models of uveitis[30]. The low concentration of MCP-1, in
the aqueous humour of the extract treated rabbits compared to the normal saline
treated (control) further elucidate the therapeutic importance of the extract
in obstructing classical NF-κB pro-inflammatory and protease activated receptor 1 (PAR1) signaling
mechanism[35-36]. This is also supported
by the normal histology of the anterior uveal tissue which was compromised in
the control group.
PGE2, a major player in
the causation of blood-aqueous barrier breakdown[11], leading to protein exudation into
the anterior chamber, was found to be reduced. This significantly prevented protein exudation into the
aqueous humour of the extract-treated rabbits, which was comparable to the
prednisolone-treated rabbits. The expression of the inducible enzyme, involved
in the synthesis of COX-2, is also illicited by NF-κB signaling or TAK1-IKK-NF-κB signaling pathway[37]. Again, cAMP signalling
pathway co-operates with LPS in the induction of COX-2 and mPGES-1
transcriptional activation[38].
The findings
suggest that the attenuated ocular inflammation can be ascribed in part to the
down-regulation of these mediators by HIE.
Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are considered second
messengers in NF-κB activation and cytokine expression[39-40]. A probable mechanism of inhibiting NF-κB activation
and inflammatory cascade propagation by HIE is the scavenging of ROS. Several
chemo-preventive phytoconstituents such as alkaloids, flavonoids and sterols in
natural products[41-42], have been shown to inhibit COX-2 and iNOS expression
by blocking improper NF-κB activation. There is convincing evidence that
indicate extracellular-regulated protein kinase and p38 mitogen-activated
protein kinase are important factors of the intracellular signaling cascades
accountable for NF-κB activation in reaction to a number of external stimuli[43]. Prednisolone on the other hand,
like all other corticosteroids are potent inhibitors of inflammatory processes
and are widely used in the treatment of uveitis and other inflammatory
disorders. It exerts its effect by directly binding of the
glucocorticoid/glucocorticoid receptor complex to glucocorticoid receptive
essentials in the promoter region of genes, or by an interaction of this
complex with other transcription factors, more so activating protein-1 or
NF-κB. It inhibits several inflammation-associated molecules such as cytokines,
chemokines, arachidonic acid metabolites, and adhesion molecules[44].
By inhibiting multiple
pro-inflammatory cytokines, the aqueous whole plant HIE exerts potent
anti-inflammatory effect on LPS-induced uveitis in New Zealand white
rabbits. This therefore provides scientific support for the traditional use as an ocular anti-inflammatory agent.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors are grateful to the management and staff of Life
Science Diagnostic Centre, Cape Coast for permitting us to use their facility
for aspects of the this study. We are also thankful to Ms. Carrin Martins for proof
reading this manuscript.
Author Kyei S conceived the idea, designed the study, wrote the protocol, managed
the literature searches, data collection and wrote the first draft of the manuscript. Asumeng Koffuor G and
Ramkissoon P were involved in the conception and design
of the study, managed the analyses of the study. Ofori Ameyaw E was involved in the design of the study, managed literature search and
critically revised the content. Akomanin Asiamah E performed the histological evaluations, interpretation of data. All
authors read and approved the final manuscript.
This article results from research towards a PhD (Optometry)
degree in the Discipline of Optometry at the University of KwaZulu Natal under
the supervision of Dr. George A. Koffuor and co- supervision of Prof. Paul
Ramkissoon.
Foundation:
Partly supported by University of Cape
Coast.
Conflicts of Interest: Kyei S, None; Koffuor GA, None; Ramkissoon P, None; Ameyaw
EO, None; Asiamah EA, None.
REFERENCES [Top]
1 Kone WM, Kande B. Qualitative
analysis of the pyrrolidine alkaloids from 11 Asteraceae and Boraginaceae used
in traditional medicine in Cote d’ Ivoire. Research
J of Phytochemistry 2012;6(3):75-83. [CrossRef]
2 Sharma
RA, Singh B, Singh D, Chandrawat P. Ethnomedicinal, pharmacological properties
and chemistry of some medicinal plants of Boraginaceae in India. J Med Plant Res 2009;3(13):1153-1175.
3 Rahman
MA, Mia MA, Shahid IZ. Pharmacological and phytochemical screen activities of
roots of Heliotropium indicum. Pharmacologyonline 2011;1:185-192.
4 Dash
GK, Abdullah MS. A Review on Helitropium
Indicum L. (Boraginaceae). International
Journal of Pharmceutical Sciences and Research 2013;4(4), 1253-1258.
5
El-Shazly A, Wink M. Diversity of pyrrolizidine alkaloids in the Boraginaceae
structures, distribution, and biological properties. Diversity 2014;6(2):188-282. [CrossRef]
6 Costa
RS, Camelo SRP, Ribeiro-Costa RM, Barbosa WLR, Vasconcelos F, Silva Junior JOC.
Physical, chemical and physic-chemical control of Heliotropium indicum Linn, Boraginaceae powder and tincture. International Journal of Pharmceutical
Sciences and Research 2011;2(7):2211-2216.
7
Rahmatullah M, Das AK, Ariful Md. AH, Mollik H, Jahan R, Khan M. An
ethnomedicinal survey of Dhamrai sub-district in Dhaka District, Bangladesh. Eurasian J Sustain Agric
2009;3(3):881-888.
8 Mollik
AH, Hossan S, Paul AK, Rahman TU, Jahan R, Rahmatullah M. A comparative
analysis of medicinal plants used by folk medicinal healers in three districts
of Bangladesh and inquiry as to mode of selection of medicinal plants. Ethnobotany Research and Applications
2010;8:195-218. [CrossRef]
9 Roeder
E, Wiedenfeld H. Plants containing pyrrolizidine alkaloids used in the
traditional Indian medicine-including ayurveda. Pharmazie 2013;68(3):83-92. [PubMed]
10
Srinivas K, Rao MEB, Rao SS. Anti-inflammatory activity of Heliotropium indicum Linn and Leucas
aspera spreng. in albino rats. Ind J
Pharmacol 2000;32(1):37-38.
11
Bansal S, Barathi VA, Iwata D, Agrawal R. Experimental autoimmune uveitis and
other animal models of uveitis: an update. Indian
J Ophthalmol 2015;63(3):211-218. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PMC free article]
12
Rosenbaum JT, McDevitt HO, Guss RB, Egbert PR. Endotoxin-induced uveitis in
rats as a model for human disease. Nature
1980;286(5773):611-613. [CrossRef]
13
Kogiso M, Tanouchi Y, Mimura Y, Nagasawa H, Himeno K. Endotoxin-induced uveitis
in mice. 1. Induction of uveitis and role of T lymphocytes. Jpn J Ophthalmol 1992;36(3):281-290. [PubMed]
14
Camilo EN, Moura GL , Arantes TE. Clinical and epidemiological
characteristics of patients with uveitis in an emergency eye care center in
Brazil. Arq Bras Oftalmol 2014;77(1):30-33.
[CrossRef]
15
Dandona L, Dandona R, John RK, McCarty CA, Rao GN. Population based assessment
of uveitis in an urban population in southern India. Br J Ophthalmol 2000;84(7):706-709. [CrossRef]
16
London NJ, Rathinam SR, Cunningham ET Jr. The epidemiology of uveitis in
developing countries. Int Ophthalmology
Clin 2010;50(2):1-17. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
17
Schlaegel TF Jr. Essentials of uveitis. Boston: Little, Brown & Co. 1969.
18 James
ER. The etiology of steroid cataract. J
Ocul Pharmacol Ther 2007;23(5):403-420. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
19 Clark
AF, Wordinger RJ. The role of steroids in outflow resistance. Exp Eye Res 2009;88(4):752-759. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
20
Foster CS, Vitale A. Diagnosis and treatment of uveitis. 2nd Ed.
Jaypee Highlights Medical Publishers Inc. 2012.
21
Agrawal RV, Murthy S, Sangwan V, Biswas J. Current approach in diagnosis and
management of anterior uveitis. Indian J
Ophthalmol 2010;58(1):11-19. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PMC free article]
22
Harborne JB. Phytochemical Methods: A Guide to modern techniques of plant
analysis. 3rd ed. London, UK: Chapman and Hall, 1998.
23 Kujur
RS, Singh V, Ram M, Yadava HN, Singh, KK, Kumari S, Roy BK. Antidiabetic
activity and phytochemical screening
of crude extract of Stevia rebaudiana in
alloxan-induced diabetic rats. Pharmacognosy Res 2010;2(4):258-263. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PMC free article]
24
Touchard E, Omri S, Naud MC, Berdugo M, Deloche C, Abadie C, Jonet L, Jeanny
JC, Crisanti P, de Kozak Y, Combette JM, Behar-Cohen F. A peptide inhibitor of
c-Jun N-terminal kinase for the treatment of endotoxin-induced uveitis. Invest Ophthalmol Visl Sci 2010;51(9):4683-4693.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
25 Boye
A, Koffuor GA, Amoateng P, Ameyaw EO, Abaitey AK. Analgesic activity and safety
assessment of Heliotropium indicum
Linn. (Boraginaceae) in rodents. International
Journal of Pharmacology 2012;8:91-100. [CrossRef]
26 Iba
T, Saitoh D. Efficacy of antithrombin in preclinical and clinical applications
for sepsis associated disseminated intravascular coagulation. J Intensive Care 2014;2(1):66. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PMC free article]
27
Allensworth JJ, Planck SR, Rosenbaum JT, Rosenzweig. HL Investigation of the
differential potentials of TLR agonists to elicit uveitis in mice. J Leukoc Biol 2011;90(6):1159-1166. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PMC free article]
28
Zarogoulidis P, Yarmus L, Darwiche K, Walter R, Huang H, Li Z, Zaric B,
Tsakiridis K, Zarogoulidis K. Interleukin-6 cytokine: a multifunctional
glycoprotein for cancer. Immunome Res 2013;9(62):16535. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
29
Kolattukudy PE, Niu J. Inflammation, endoplasmic reticulum stress, autophagy,
and the monocyte chemoattractant protein-1/ccr2 pathway. Cir Res 2012;110(1):174-189. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PMC free article]
30 Chao
SC, Vagaggini T, Nien CW, Huang S-C, Lin HY. Effects of lutein and zeaxanthin
on lps-induced secretion of il-8 by uveal melanocytes and relevant signal
pathways J Ophthalmology
2015;2015:152854.
31
Nishida T, Inui M, Nomizu M. Peptide therapies for ocular surface disturbances
based on fibronectin-integrin interactions. Prog
Ret Eye Res 2015;47:38-63. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
32 Chen
FT, Liu YC, Yang CM, Yang CH. Anti-inflammatory effect of the proteasome
inhibitor bortezomib on endotoxin-induced uveitis in rats. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2012;53(7):3682-3694. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
33
Reuter S, Gupta SC, Chaturvedi MM, Aggarwal BB. Oxidative stress, inflammation,
and cancer: how are they linked? Free
Radic Biol Med 2010;49(11):1603-1616.
[CrossRef] [PubMed] [PMC free article]
34
DiDonato JA, Mercurio F, Karin M. NF-κB and the link between inflammation and
cancer. Immunological Rev 2012;246:379-400. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
35 Lee
H, Hamilton JR. Physiology, pharmacology, and therapeutic potential of
protease-activated receptors in vascular disease. Pharmacol Ther 2012;134(2):246-259. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
36
Heiligenhaus A, Thurau, S, Hennig M, Grajewski RS, Wildner G. Anti-inflammatory
treatment of uveitis with biologicals: new treatment options that reflect
pathogenetic knowledge of the disease. Graefes
Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2010;248(11)11:1531-1551.
37 Zhang
J, Lei T, Chen X, Peng Y, Long H, Zhou L, Huang J, Chen Z, Long Q, Yang Z.
Resistin up-regulates COX-2 expression via TAK1-IKK-NF-kappaB signaling
pathway. Inflammation 2010;33(1):25-33.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
38
Díaz-Muñoz MD, Osma-García IC, Fresno M, Iñiguez MA. Involvement of PGE2 and
the cAMP signalling pathway in the up-regulation of COX-2 and mPGES-1
expression in LPS-activated macrophages. Biochem
J 2012; 443(2):451-461. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
39
Morgan MJ, Liu ZG. Crosstalk of reactive oxygen species and NF-κB
signaling. Cell Res 2011;21(1):103-115.
[CrossRef] [PubMed] [PMC free article]
40 Izzi
V, Masuelli L, Tresoldi I, Sacchetti P, Modesti A, Galvano F, Bei R. The
effects of dietary flavonoids on the regulation of redox inflammatory networks. Front Biosci (Landmark Ed) 2012;17:2396-2418.
[CrossRef]
41
Jayakumar T, Thomas PA, Geraldine P. In-vitro antioxidant activities of an
ethanolic extract of the oyster mushroom, Pleurotus ostreatus. Inn Food Sci Emerg Tech
2009;10(2):228-234. [CrossRef]
42
Pragada RR, Rao Ethadi S, Yasodhara B, Praneeth Dasari VS, Mallikarjuna Rao T.
In-vitro antioxidant and antibacterial activities of different fractions of Heliotropium indicum L. Journal of
Pharmacy Research 2012;5(2):1051-1053.
43
Cargnello M, Roux PP. Activation and function of the MAPKs and their
substrates, the MAPK-activated protein kinases. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 2011;75(1):50-83. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PMC free article]
44
Ismael H, Horst M, Farooq M, Jordon J, Patton JH, Rubinfeld IS. Adverse effects
of preoperative steroid use on surgical outcomes. Am J Surg 2011;201(3):305-308.<bb>
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[Top]