·Investigation··Current Issue· ·Achieve· ·Search
Articles· ·Online
Submission· ·About IJO·
Prevalence and risk factors of lens opacities in rural
populations living at two different altitudes in China
Jia-Ming Yu1, De-Qi
Yang1, Han Wang1, Jun Xu1, Qian Gao2,
Li-Wen Hu2, Fang Wang2, Yang Wang2, Qi-Chang
Yan1, Jin-Song Zhang1, Yang Liu2
1Department of Ophthalmology,
the Fourth Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110005,
Liaoning Province, China
2Department of Environmental
Health, School of Public Health, China Medical University, Shenyang 110122,
Liaoning Province, China
Correspondence to: Yang Liu. Department of Environmental Health,
School of Public Health, China Medical University, No.77 Puhe Road, North New
Area, Shenyang 110122, Liaoning Province, China. cmu_liuyang@163.com
Received: 2015-06-04 Accepted: 2015-08-31
Abstract
AIM: To investigate the prevalence
of and risk factors for lens opacities in populations living at two different
altitudes in China.
METHODS:
A total of 813 subjects aged ≥40y in Lhasa (Tibet
Autonomous Region, China. Altitude:
3658 m) and Shaoxing (Zhejiang Province, China. Altitude: 15 m) were underwent
eye examinations and interviewed in this cross-sectional study. Participants’ lens
opacities were graded according to the Lens Opacities Classification System II
(LOCS II) and the types of opacities with LOCS II scores ≥2 were determined. Univariate
and stepwise logistic regression were used to evaluate the associations of
independent risk factors with lens opacities.
RESULTS:
Lens
opacities were significantly more prevalent in the high-altitude than in the
low-altitude area (χ2=10.54,
P<0.001). Lens opacities appear to
develop earlier in people living at high than at low altitude. The main types
of lens opacity in Lhasa and Shaoxing were mixed (23.81%) and cortical
(17.87%), respectively. Independent risk factors associated with all lens
opacities were age, ultraviolet (UV) radiation exposure, and educational level.
Compared with participants aged 40-49y, the risk of lens opacities increased
gradually from 2 to 85 times per 10y [odds ratio (OR)=2.168-84.731, P<0.05). The risk of lens opacities was
about two times greater in participants with the highest UV exposure than in
those with the lowest exposure (OR=2.606, P=0.001).
Educational level was inversely associated with lens opacities; literacy
deceased the risk by about 25% compared with illiteracy (OR=0.758, P=0.041).
CONCLUSION:
Old age, higher
UV exposure and lower educational level are important risk factors
for the development of lens opacities. Lens opacities are more prevalent among
high-altitude than low-altitude inhabitants.
KEYWORDS: lens opacities; risk factor; altitude; ultraviolet exposure;
cataract
DOI:10.18240/ijo.2016.04.23
Citation:
Yu JM, Yang DQ, Wang H, Xu J, Gao Q, Hu LW, Wang F, Wang Y, Yan QC, Zhang JS,
Liu Y. Prevalence and risk factors of lens opacities in rural populations
living at two different altitudes in China. Int
J Ophthalmol 2016;9(4):610-616
INTRODUCTION
Age-related
lens opacity (cataract) is the leading cause of blindness worldwide[1-2]. Of an estimated 39 million blind
people worldwide in 2010, 51% of cases were attributed to cataract[3]. As
populations age, the number of blind people is expected to double by 2025[4]. Age-related cataracts
account for 80% of all cataracts[5].
More than 60 million patients in China had cataracts in 2007, and more than 7
million had disabilities caused by cataracts[6]. The burden of cataract is expected to pose
increasing challenges for healthcare systems in future years.
Ultraviolet
(UV) radiation, an important ambient factor associated with age-related lens
opacity, was taken as a continual focus of research for several decades[7]. Many epidemiological
studies of sunlight and cataract with diverse designs and approaches were
conducted. Generally, sunlight or UV exposure was quantified using annual or daily
hours of sunshine[8-10], average daily erythemal UVB exposure[11], indoor/outdoor
occupation and residential history[12-13],
or a UVB or UVA exposure index combined with ambient solar or UV radiation and
personal behavior[14-15].
Assessment endpoints of the effects of sunlight or UV radiation on cataract
were typically the prevalence of cataract under a given UV exposure condition[8-9] or associations
between different types of lens opacity and sunlight or UV exposure, expressed
as odds ratios (ORs)[16-17].
Due to differences in examination methods and
diagnostic or evaluative criteria, the results of these studies were usually
not compared and some were controversial.
Latitude and altitude are two basic
geographical factors that influence the intensity of UV radiation. UV exposure
and the prevalence of age-related cataract increase with decreasing latitude
and increasing altitude[10].
Lhasa (Tibet Autonomous Region, China. Altitude: 3658 m; latitude: 29.7° N) is
one of the high altitude areas of human being to exposure high intensity UV
radiation, it is the highly valuable area of human survival with extreme UV
exposure in the world. The herdsmen live here with extreme higher UV exposure is
rare in the traditional style of life. Moreover, because modern life style will
make herders less to outdoor activities, it is very difficult to search such effects
of higher UV exposure on cataract in the future, our present research provided
important exposure upper limit information on dose response relationship between
UV exposure and cataract, and Shaoxing (Zhejiang
Province, China. Altitude: 15 m; latitude: 30.2° N) was taken as control.
Thus, the current study was conducted to explore the prevalence of lens
opacities in populations living at two different altitudes but similar
latitudes, and to examine the risk factors for all lens opacities.
SUBJECTS
AND METHODS
Ethics Statement The ethics committee of China Medical
University approved the study protocol and all subjects provided written
informed consent before participating.
Subjects Subjects were from rural areas at
high (Lhasa, Tibet Autonomous Region, China. Altitude: 3658 m; latitude: 29.7° N) and low (Shaoxing, Zhejiang Province, China. Altitude: 15 m; latitude:
30.2° N) altitudes in China. In both areas, we notified local residents of the
research aim with the help of village committees and invited them to
participate in the study. Only native-born local residents aged ≥40y who had
not migrated were enrolled. All subjects were farmers with stable, regular
lifestyles and simple daily routines. Subjects with glaucoma, pseudophakia, and
bilateral aphakia were excluded.
Lens
Examination and Lens Opacity Classification Following
dilation with 1% tropicamide and 2.5% phenylephrine, participants’ lenses were
examined using a slit lamp. The Lens Opacities Classification System II (LOCS
II)[17] was
used to classify opacities into seven cortical (C0, Ctr, CⅠ-CⅤ), five nuclear (N0-NⅣ), and five posterior subcapsular (PSC; P0-PⅣ) grades of increasing severity, according to
photographic standards. Individuals with a
single type of opacity (LOCS II grade ≥2) in one or both eyes were assigned to the cortical, nuclear, or PSC
opacity category, as appropriate. For participants with unilateral lens
extraction, LOCS II grades from contralateral phakic eyes were used to define
lens opacity type. Those with various combinations of nuclear, cortical,
and PSC opacities (LOCS II grade ≥2) in one or both eyes were classified as
having mixed-type lens opacities.
Data
Collection and Risk Factor Assessment
Trained
investigators interviewed participants and used a questionnaire to collect data
on demographic and lifestyle characteristics, including age, gender,
nationality, smoking status, alcohol consumption, educational level, fruit and
vegetable intake, and amount of outdoor activity. Smoking status was classified
as yes (had smoked for at least 6mo during his/her life) or no (did not smoke
at all or had ever smoked less than 6mo during his/her life). Alcohol
consumption status was classified as yes (at least once per week) or no (no
consumption or less than once per week). Educational level was classified as
literacy (more than primary school) or illiteracy (less than primary school).
Fruit intake over participants’ lifetimes was classified as
yes (≥2d every week) or no (<2d every week).
Vegetable intake over participants’ lifetimes was classified as yes (≥2 diet
every day) or no (<2 diet every day).
The amounts of
outdoor activity in four stages of participants’ lives (pre-school, school,
work, and special periods such as recuperation after a serious illness) were
used to evaluate UV exposure. Interviewers asked participants to recall the
typical numbers of hours spent outdoors between 06:00 and 19:00 on work/school
and non-work/school days during each stage.
Ultraviolet
Exposure Calculation and Evaluation
Using
average annual erythemal UV exposure data from the National Aeronautics and
Space Administration (NASA)[18]
and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)[19] procedures for calculating local times of sunrise,
solar noon, sunset, dawn, and dusk, we calculated daily erythemal UV exposure
and hours of sunshine for Lhasa and Shaoxing. We then determined hourly
erythemal UV exposure. Participants’ UV exposure was determined by multiplying
hourly erythemal UV exposure by reported daily average hours of outdoor
activity, and classified into four grades according to quartiles (<1000, 1000-1199,
1200-2700, and >2700 J/m2).
Statistical Analysis The Chi-squared test was used to
assess differences in categorical sociodemographic variables between the low-
and high-altitude groups overall and between and within regions by age group
and gender. Variables with P-values
≤0.2 were considered to be candidate risk factors for lens opacities and
included in a multivariate logistic regression model. Stepwise logistic
regression including data from the entire study sample was performed to
evaluate independent associations between these risk factors and lens
opacities, with estimated ORs and 95% confidence intervals (CI). All
statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software (ver. 16.0 for Windows;
SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).
RESULTS
Characteristics
of the Study Population After the exclusion of
subjects with glaucoma (n=6),
pseudophakia (n=7), and bilateral
aphakia (n=7), 813 eligible
volunteers (231 in Lhasa, 582 in Shaoxing) were included in this study.
Participants’ characteristics are summarized by altitude in Table 1. The
average age was 58.14 (range, 40-91)y. The mean UV exposure was 1750.19±1111.77
(range, 366.47-5301.42) J/m2 and the mean (±standard deviation)
daily outdoor time was 5.33±1.56 (range, 1.57-10.81)h. UV exposure levels and
outdoor times were significantly higher in subjects from Lhasa than in those
from Shaoxing (3404.46±573.78 vs
1093.60±277.95 J/m2 and 6.98±1.17 vs 4.69±1.19h/d, respectively; both P<0.001). Compared with literate participants, illiterate
participants had longer outdoor times (5.87±1.59 vs 4.94±1.42h/d, P<0.001)
and significantly greater UV exposure (2191.19±1262.52 vs 1441.12±869.31 J/m2, P<0.001).
Table 1 Demographic
characteristics of the study population
n (%)
Parameters |
Lhasa
(high
altitude; n=231) |
Shaoxing (low
altitude; n=582) |
Age
(a; |
56.64±12.19 |
58.74±11.18 |
40-49 |
77 (33.3) |
145
(24.9) |
50-59 |
75 (32.5) |
161
(27.7) |
60-69 |
36 (15.6) |
174
(29.9) |
70-79 |
28 (12.1) |
81 (13.9) |
≥80 |
15 (6.5) |
21 (3.6) |
Gender |
|
|
F |
156
(67.5) |
355
(61.0) |
M |
75 (32.5) |
227
(39.0) |
Smoking |
|
|
No |
186
(80.5) |
419
(72.0) |
Occasional |
12 (5.2) |
12 (2.1) |
Former |
7 (3.0) |
45 (7.7) |
Current |
26 (11.3) |
106
(18.2) |
Drinking |
|
|
No |
133
(57.6) |
333
(57.2) |
Occasional |
79 (34.2) |
69 (11.9) |
Former |
6 (2.6) |
35 (6.0) |
Current |
13 (5.6) |
145
(24.9) |
Level
of education |
|
|
Illiteracy |
148
(64.0) |
187
(32.1) |
Primary school |
60 (26.0) |
240
(41.2) |
Middle school |
15 (6.5) |
122
(21.0) |
College |
8 (3.5) |
33 (5.7) |
Fruit |
|
|
No |
111
(48.1) |
244
(41.9) |
Yes |
120
(51.9) |
338
(58.1) |
Vegetable |
|
|
≤1diet/d |
63 (27.3) |
28 (4.8) |
2 diet/d |
153
(66.2) |
185
(31.8) |
3 diet/d |
15 (6.5) |
369
(63.4) |
Outdoors
time (h/d;
|
6.98±1.17 |
4.69±1.19 |
UV
exposure level (J/m2;
|
3404.46±573.78 |
1093.60±277.95 |
<1000 |
- |
209
(35.9) |
1000-1199 |
- |
206
(35.4) |
1200-2700 |
29 (12.6) |
167
(28.7) |
>2700 |
202
(87.4) |
- |
Figure 1 depicts the overall prevalence of lens opacities by age group in Lhasa
and Shaoxing. The overall prevalence of lens opacities was significantly higher
in the high-altitude than in the low-altitude group (37.23% vs 25.77%; χ2=10.54, P<0.001).
This pattern was evident in participants aged 40-49 (χ2=7.39, P=0.007),
50-59 (χ2=19.29, P<0.001), and 60-69 (χ2=8.89, P<0.001)y (high altitude: 10.39%, 26.67%, and 61.11%,
respectively; low altitude: 2.07%, 6.21%, and 34.48%, respectively), but not in
the 70-79 and ≥80 year age groups.
Figure 1 The
prevalence of lens opacities in Lhasa and Shaoxing by age group.
Figure 2
presents gender differences in the prevalence of lens opacities by age group in
Lhasa and Shaoxing. This prevalence did not differ between men and women in
Lhasa overall or in any age group. In Shaoxing, the prevalence of lens
opacities did not differ between men and women overall, but it was
significantly higher in women than in men in the 70-79y (88.37% vs 56.26%; χ2=11.18, P<0.001)
and ≥80y (100% vs 66.67%; χ2=4.67, P=0.031) age groups. The prevalence of lens opacities was
significantly higher among men aged 50-59 and 60-69y in Lhasa than among men of
the same ages in Shaoxing (28% vs
5.56%, χ2=7.59, P=0.006 and 81.82% vs 31.51%, χ2=10.26,
P<0.001, respectively). Opacities
were more prevalent among women aged 40-49 and 50-59y in Lhasa than in
corresponding participants in Shaoxing (7.84% vs 1.10%, χ2
=4.38, P=0.036 and 26.00% vs 6.48%, χ2=11.78, P<0.001,
respectively).
Figure 2 Gender
differences in the prevalence of lens opacities in Lhasa and Shaoxing.
Figure 3 shows
differences in the prevalence of lens opacities by type in Lhasa and Shaoxing.
The main type of lens opacity in Lhasa was mixed (23.81%), followed by PSC
(6.49%), nuclear (6.06%), and cortical (0.87%). In Shaoxing, cortical lens
opacities were most common (17.87%), followed by nuclear (6.53%), mixed
(1.20%), and PSC (0.17%) opacities.
Figure 3 The
prevalence of lens opacities in Lhasa and Shaoxing by type.
In Lhasa, the
most common type of opacity in subjects aged 50-79y was mixed, followed by
nuclear and PSC; the prevalence of these three types of lens opacity increased
with age in these participants (Figure 4A). Cortical lens opacities were detected
only in participants aged 40-59y, and all opacities in participants aged ≥80y
were mixed. In contrast, the prevalence of cortical lens opacities increased
gradually with age from 40 to ≥80y and nuclear opacities were distributed
mainly in subjects aged >60y in Shaoxing (Figure 4B). Mixed lens opacities
were detected in subjects aged >70y and a few PSC opacities were found in
those aged 70-79y in Shaoxing.
Figure 4 Age-related
differences in the prevalence of lens opacity types in Lhasa (A) and Shaoxing
(B).
Risk Factors for All Lens
Opacities Table 2 presents the
results of final logistic regression models that evaluated the associations of
various risk factors with lens opacities. Age, educational level, fruit intake,
and UV exposure were identified as candidate risk factors at the univariate
level (P<0.2) and included in the
multivariate model; gender, smoking status, and alcohol consumption were not
included in this model. The results of stepwise logistic regression showed that
independent risk factors associated with lens opacities were older age,
educational level, and UV exposure. Compared with participants aged 40-49y, the
prevalence of lens opacities was about two times higher in those aged 50-59y
(OR=2.168, P=0.035), 11 times higher
in those aged 60-69y (OR=11.95, P<0.001),
52 times higher in subjects aged 70-79y (OR=52.045, P<0.001), and more than about 85-fold higher in those aged ≥80y
(OR=84.731, P<0.001). The risk of
lens opacities was higher in subjects with high (>2700 J/m2) UV
exposure levels than in those with low (<1000 J/m2) UV exposure
(OR=2.606, P=0.001). Educational
level was inversely associated with lens opacities, the risk among literate
participants was about 75% that among illiterate subjects (OR=0.758, P=0.041).
Table
2 Risk factors for lens opacities in populations in Lhasa and Shaoxing
Variables |
No (n=813) |
Univariate
OR (95% CI) |
1P |
Multivariate
OR (95% CI) |
2P |
Age (a) |
|
|
|
|
|
40-49 |
222 |
1 |
|
1 |
- |
50-59 |
236 |
2.549 (1.270-5.114) |
0.008 |
2.168 (1.056-4.451) |
0.035 |
60-69 |
210 |
11.211 (5.885-21.355) |
<0.001 |
11.950 (6.000-23.799) |
<0.001 |
70-79 |
109 |
53.148 (25.707-109.881) |
<0.001 |
52.045 (23.849-113.580) |
< 0.001 |
≥80 |
36 |
108.500 (35.781-329.009) |
0.001 |
84.731 (26.658-269.314) |
<0.001 |
Gender |
|
|
|
|
|
M |
302 |
1 |
|
|
|
F |
511 |
1.053 (0.770-1.442) |
0.745 |
- |
- |
Education |
|
|
|
|
|
Illiteracy |
335 |
1 |
|
1 |
|
Literacy |
478 |
0.429 (0.344-0.534) |
<0.001 |
0.758 (0.581-0.989) |
0.041 |
Fruit |
|
|
|
|
|
No |
355 |
1 |
|
|
|
Yes |
458 |
0.746 (0.637-0.874) |
<0.001 |
- |
- |
UV exposure
(J/m2) |
|
|
|
|
|
<1000 |
209 |
1 |
|
1 |
|
1000-1199 |
206 |
1.959 (1.254-3.060) |
0.003 |
1.220 (0.705-2.110) |
0.477 |
1200-2700 |
196 |
1.365 (0.854-2.171) |
0.195 |
0.882 (0.501-1.551) |
0.662 |
>2700 |
202 |
2.449 (1.575-3.810) |
<0.001 |
2.606 (1.454-4.671) |
0.001 |
OR: Odds ratio;
CI: Confidence interval. 1P value of univariate
OR; 2P value of multivariate OR.
DISCUSSION
From west to east, China encompasses a nearly 4000 m
difference in altitude, making it an ideal setting for research on the effects
of altitude on lens opacities. To eliminate the effects of latitude and focus
solely on those of altitude, participants in the present study were from low-
(Shaoxing) and high- (Lhasa) altitude regions at almost the same latitude.
Furthermore, we chose to study native-born rural farmers with stable lifestyles
and simple daily routines to eliminate the complex effects of urban
inhabitants’ diverse occupations, lifestyles, and outdoor activity patterns.
Time spent outdoors was almost entirely consistent with farming activities
among our participants, which aided the comparative evaluation of ambient UV
exposure.
The results of
the present study showed that the prevalence of lens opacities increased with
age in both regions and was significantly higher in Lhasa than in Shaoxing,
especially among those aged <70y. Thus, lens opacities appear to develop
earlier in people living at high than at low altitude. Cortical lens opacities
were most common in Shaoxing, consistent with the findings of several studies
that strongly support UVB as a risk factor for cortical cataract[15,20]. In contrast, the
main type of lens opacity in Lhasa was mixed. This finding contrasts with that
of EI Chehab et al[21] who reported that UV exposure at an altitude >3000 m was
a risk factor for anterior cortical cataract in a maintain guide group (OR=1.16,
P<0.01). The reason for this
difference is not clear.
Stepwise
logistic regression of data from the entire study population revealed that age,
UV exposure, and educational level were independent risk factors for lens
opacities. The development of lens opacities is often considered a normal part
of the aging process; a strong association between age and cataracts has been
reported widely, and the Barbados Eye and Age-Related Eye Disease studies found
that age was a significant risk factor for incident nuclear, cortical, and PSC
lens opacities[22-24].
The risk of lens opacities increased gradually from 2- to 85-fold in our study
subjects, similar to the findings of previous studies. However, the link
between age and lens opacities likely entails increased cumulative exposure to
numerous risks, including environmental (e.g.
UVB exposure, oxidative damage) and biological (e.g. hormone, metabolism) factors.
Many
epidemiological studies conducted worldwide have examined UV exposure as a risk
factor for lens opacities, but the effects of altitude and the associations
between different altitudes and UV exposure levels remain unclear. In the
present study, we calculated participants’ UV exposure using daily erythemal
exposure values from NASA and found that all subjects with the lowest (<1000
J/m2) exposure levels were from Shaoxing, whereas all of those with
the highest (>2700 J/m2) levels were from Lhasa. Our data suggest
that the risk of lens opacities is more than two times greater among people
living at high altitudes with higher UV exposure levels than among those living
at low altitudes with lower exposure levels.
Socioeconomic and lifestyle factors may influence the
development of lens opacities. Consistent with previous findings that education
level is inversely associated with the risk of nuclear and cortical cataract
development[25-26], the
results of the present study indicated that educational level was a significant
and inversely associated risk factor for lens opacities in low- and
high-altitude areas. Literacy was associated with a 25% decrease in the risk of
lens opacities compared with illiteracy. We also found that illiterate
participants spent more hours outdoors and had significantly greater UV
exposure than literate participants, suggesting that a high education level is
associated with less time spent outdoors. These results further highlight the
importance of high UV exposure at high altitude as a risk factor related to
lens opacities.
Smoking and alcohol consumption have
been related directly to at least one type of lens opacity in many
cross-sectional[27-28]
and longitudinal[29]
studies. However, we found
no evidence suggesting a relationship between smoking, alcohol consumption, or
fruit and vegetable intake and lens opacities.
In addition, the
Tibetan Plateau has an average altitude of more than 4000 m, the annual average
oxygen content in the air is only 64.3% of that in the plain. In Lhasa, the
highest oxygen contents in the autumn and the lowest oxygen contents in the
winter is 66.2% and 63.3% of that in the plain, respectively. Some experimental
studies were conducted on the effects of hypoxia on the mechanism of cataract
formation[30-31]. Thus, the
role of hypoxia in the formation of cataract is also not negligible in the high
altitude area.
The small
number of subjects constitutes a limitation of the current study. Although the
results showed distinct differences in the prevalence of lens opacities in
Lhasa and Shaoxing, insufficient numbers of subjects were classified as having
nuclear, cortical, PSC, and mixed lens opacities to examine covariance in the
logistic regression model or to explore type-specific risk factors. Thus, we
analyzed only the relationships of risk factors with the overall prevalence of
lens opacities at the two altitudes. In addition, the Chinese policies of
reform and opening have led increasing numbers of rural young men to migrate
from rural to urban areas for work in recent years, dramatically changing the
rural population structure. Thus, our study population predominantly comprised
women and older individuals. Furthermore, almost all participants in Lhasa were
of Zang nationality, whereas those in Shaoxing were of Han nationality; genetic
differences and dietary customs in high-altitude residents may affect the
prevalence of lens opacities, but these factors were not examined in the
present study.
Overall, notwithstanding these
limitations, the results of this study provide new evidence for the link
between altitude and lens opacities. Using the LOCS II, we determined that lens
opacities were more prevalent in high-altitude than in low-altitude rural communities
located at similar latitudes. Lens opacities also appeared to develop earlier
at high than at low altitude. Older age, higher UV exposure, and lower
educational level were associated with a higher prevalence of lens opacities.
Further studies with larger samples are needed to explore how and why high
altitude induces the development of different types of lens opacity.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Foundation:
Supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Liaoning Province, China (No.
2014021009).
Conflicts
of Interest: Yu JM, None; Yang DQ, None; Wang
H, None; Xu J, None; Gao Q, None; Hu LW, None; Wang
F, None; Wang Y, None; Yan QC, None; Zhang JS, None; Liu
Y, None.
REFERENCES [Top]
1 Gollogly HE,
Hodge DO, St Sauver JL, Erie JC. Increasing incidence of cataract surgery:
population-based study. J Cataract
Refract Surg 2013;39(9):1383-1389. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PMC free article]
2 Watkinson S,
Seewoodhary R. Cataract management: effect on patients’ quality of life. Nurs Stand 2015;29(21):42-48. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
3 Pascolini D,
Mariotti SP. Global estimates of visual impairment: 2010, Br J Ophthalmol 2012;96(5):614-618. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
4 World Health
Organization. Prevention of blindness and visual impairment: WHO releases the
new global estimates on visual impairment. Geneva: World Health Organization.
Available at: http://www.who.int/blindness/en/index.html. Accessed November 25,
2013.
5 Stevens GA,
White RA, Flaxman SR, Price H, Jonas JB, Keeffe J, Leasher J, Naidoo K,
Pesudovs K, Resnikoff S, Taylor H, Bourne RR. Global prevalence of vision
impairment and blindness: magnitude and temporal trends, 1990-2010. Ophthalmology 2013;120(12):2377-2384. [CrossRef]
6 Office of
the Second China National Sample Survey on Disability. Documentation of the
Second China National Sample Survey on Disability, Beijing: China Statistics
Press. 2007,1380.
7 West SK,
Longstreth JD, Munoz BE, Pitcher HM, Duncan DD. Model of risk of cortical
cataract in the US population with exposure to increased ultraviolet radiation
due to stratospheric ozone depletion. Am
J Epidemiol 2005;162(11):1080-1088. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
8 Wang Y, Yu
J, Gao Q, Hu L, Gao N, Gong H, Liu Y. The relationship between the disability
prevalence of cataracts and ambient erythemal ultraviolet radiation in China. PLoS One 2012;7(11):e51137.
9 Yam JC, Kwok
AK. Ultraviolet light and ocular diseases. Int
Ophthalmol 2014;34(2):383-400. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
10 Díez-Ajenjo
MA, García-Domene MC, Artigas JM, Felipe A, Peris-Martínez C, Menezo JL. Lens
opacities in Valencia, Spain. Eur J
Ophthalmol 2011;21(6):715-722. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
11 Roberts JE.
Ultraviolet radiation as a risk factor for cataract and macular degeneration. Eye Contact Lens 2011;37(4):246-249. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
12 Mrena S,
Kivelä T, Kurttio P, Auvinen A. Lens opacities among physicians occupationally
exposed to ionizing radiation-a pilot study in Finland. Scand J Work Environ Health 2011;37(3):237-243. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
13 Finger RP,
Sivasubramaniam S, Morjaria P, Bansal A, Muhit M, Kinra S, Gilbert CE.
Migration study of lens opacities in Bangladeshi adults in London and
Bangladesh: a pilot study. Br J
Ophthalmol 2015;99(6):762-767. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
14 Allinson S,
Asmuss M, Baldermann C, Bentzen J, Buller D, Gerber N, Green AC, Greinert R,
Kimlin M, Kunrath J, Matthes R, Pölzl-Viol C, Rehfuess E, Rossmann C, Schüz N,
Sinclair C, Deventer Ev, Webb A, Weiss W, Ziegelberger G. Validity and use of
the UV index: report from the UVI working group, Schloss Hohenkammer, Germany,
5-7 December 2011. Health Phys 2012;103(3):301-306. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
15 Zhu M, Yu
J, Gao Q, Wang Y, Hu L, Zheng Y, Wang F, Liu Y. The relationship between
disability-adjusted life years of cataracts and ambient erythemal ultraviolet
radiation in China. J Epidemiol 2015;25(1):57-65.
[CrossRef] [PubMed] [PMC free article]
16 Delcourt C,
Cougnard-Grégoire A, Boniol M, Carrière I, Doré JF, Delyfer MN, Rougier MB, Le
Goff M, Dartigues JF, Barberger-Gateau P, Korobelnik JF. Lifetime exposure to
ambient ultraviolet radiation and the risk for cataract extraction and
age-related macular degeneration: the Alienor Study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2014;55(11):7619-7627. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
17
Pastor-Valero M, Fletcher AE, de Stavola BL, Chaqués-Alepúz V. Years of
sunlight exposure and cataract: a case-control study in a Mediterranean
population. BMC Ophthalmol 2007;7:18.
[CrossRef] [PubMed] [PMC free article]
18 Nimbus 7
data. NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Data Archive Center database. Available
at: ftp://toms.gsfc.nasa.gov/pub/nimbus7/data/uv_ery_4_wave
lengths/ery_dose/Accessed 27 April 2006. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
19 The web
(http://www.srrb.noaa.gov/highlights/sunrise/sunrise.html) Calculation of local
times of sunrise, solar noon, sunset, dawn, and dusk based on the calculation
procedure by NOAA. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
20 Galichanin
K, Löfgren S, Söderberg P. Cataract after repeated daily in vivo exposure to
ultraviolet radiation. Health Phys
2014;107(6):523-529. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
21 EI Chehab
H, Blein JP, Herry JP, Chave N, Ract-Madoux G, Agard E, Guarracino G, Swalduz
B, Mourgues G, Dot C. Ocular phototoxicity and altitude among mountain guides. J Fr Ophtalmol 2012;35(10):809-815. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
22 Athanasiov
PA, Casson RJ, Sullivan T, Newland HS, Shein WK, Muecke JS, Selva D, Aung T. Cataract
in rural Myanmar: prevalence and risk factors from the Meiktila Eye Study. Br J Ophthalmol 2008;92(9):1169-1174. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PMC free article]
23 Hennis A,
Wu SY, Nemesure B, Leske MC. Risk factors for incident cortical and posterior
subcapsular lens opacities in the Barbados Eye Studies. Arch Ophthalmol 2004;122(4):525-530. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PMC free article]
24 Chang JR,
Koo E, Agron E, Hallak J, Clemons T, Azar D, Sperduto RD, Ferris FL 3rd, Chew
EY; Age-Related Eye Disease Study Group. Risk factors associated with incident
cataracts and cataract surgery in the Age-Related Eye Disease Study (AREDS):
AREDS report number 32. Ophthalmology
2011;118(11):2113-2119. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
25 Nam GE, Han
K, Ha SG, Han BD, Kim DH, Kim YH, Cho KH, Park YG, Ko BJ. Relationship between
socioeconomic and lifestyle factors and cataracts in Koreans: The Korea
National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2008-2011. Eye (Lond) 2015;29(7):913-920. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
26 Park S, Kim
T, Cho SI, Lee EH. Association between cataract and the degree of obesity. Optom Vis Sci 2013;90(9):1019-1027. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PMC free article]
27 Lu ZQ, Sun
WH, Yan J, Jiang TX, Zhai SN, Li Y. Cigarette smoking, body mass index
associated with the risks of age-related cataract in male patients in northeast
China. Int J Ophthalmol 2012;5(3):317-322.
[CrossRef] [PubMed] [PMC free article]
28 Fan AZ, Li
Y, Zhang X, Klein R, Mokdad AH, Saaddine JB, Balluz L.Alcohol consumption,
drinking pattern, and self-reported visual impairment. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 2012;19(1):8-15. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PMC free article]
29 Steel N,
Hardcastle AC, Clark A, Mounce LT, Bachmann MO, Richards SH, Henley WE,
Campbell JL, Melzer D. Self-reported quality of care for older adults from 2004
to 2011: a cohort study. Age Ageing 2014;43(5):716-720.
30 Goralska M,
Fleisher LN, McGahan MC. Hypoxia induced changes in expression of proteins
involved in iron uptake and storage in cultured lens epithelial cells. Exp Eye Res 2014;125:135-141.
31 Akoyev V,
Das S, Jena S, Grauer L, Takemoto DJ.Hypoxia-regulated activity of PKCepsilon
in the lens. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2009;50(3):1271-1282.
[Top]