Surgical management of fungal
endophthalmitis resulting from fungal keratitis
Yan Gao1,2, Nan Chen2,
Xiao-Guang Dong2, Gong-Qiang Yuan3, Bin Yu2,
Li-Xin Xie2
1Qingdao University Medical College,
Qingdao 266071, Shandong Province, China
2Qingdao
Eye Hospital, Shandong Eye Institute, Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences,
Qingdao 266071, Shandong Province,
China
3Shandong
Eye Hospital, Shandong Eye Institute, Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences,
Jinan 250021, Shandong Province,
China
Correspondence
to: Li-Xin Xie. Shandong Eye Institute,
5 Yanerdao Road, Qingdao 266071,
Shandong Province, China. lixin_xie@hotmail.com
Received: 2015-12-18
Accepted: 2016-02-19
Abstract
AIM: To report
the fungal organisms, clinical features, surgical treatment strategies, and
outcomes of patients with culture-proven exogenous fungal endophthalmitis (EFE)
secondary to keratitis, and evaluate the role of surgery in the treatment.
METHODS: The
clinical records of 27 patients (27 eyes) with culture-proven EFE resulting
from fungal keratitis treated at Shandong Eye Institute from January 2007 to
January 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. Information about fungal culture
results, clinical features, surgical procedures, and final visual acuity was obtained.
RESULTS: There
were 39 positive culture results from samples of cornea, hypopyon, vitreous and
lens capsule, accounting for 56%, 26%, 15% and 2.5%, respectively. Fusarium was
identified in 44% (12/27) of the eyes, followed by Aspergillus in 22% (6/27). Posterior segment infection was involved in 78% (21/27)
of the patients. The corneal infection was larger than 3 mm ×3
mm in 89% (24/27) of the patients, and 22% (6/27) of them had the entire
cornea, and even the sclera involved. Three eyes had silicone oil tamponade,
and two eyes had retinal detachment. Twenty-two eyes (81.5%)
underwent penetrating keratoplasty (PKP), and over half of them (54.5%) were
operated within 3d from the onset of antifungal therapy. Fourteen eyes (52%)
underwent intracameral antifungal drug injection, and three of them required
repeated injections. Fifteen eyes (55.6%) underwent pars plana vitrectomy
(PPV). The rate of the eyes undergoing PPV as the initial surgical procedure
was 60% (9/15), lower than 77% in PKP. Intravitreal injection was given in 59%
of the eyes (16/27), and 75% of them required repeated injections. The final
visual acuity was 20/100 or better in 37% of the eyes, and better than counting
fingers in 55.6% of the eyes. Five eyes (18.5%) were eviscerated. In the two
eyes with concurrent retinal detachment, one achieved retinal reattachment, and
the other was eviscerated. In the three eyes with silicone oil tamponade, two
eyes received silicone oil removal, and the other one was eviscerated.
CONCLUSION: Fusarium
and Aspergillus are the dominant pathogens in EFE resulting from
keratitis. Aggressive antifungal
surgeries including multiple intravitreal injections, PKP and core vitrectomy (especially
in the initial surgery) are helpful procedures to improve prognosis of severe
EFE secondary to keratitis.
KEYWORDS: exogenous
fungal endophthalmitis; fungal keratitis; penetrating keratoplasty; vitrectomy;
antifungal therapy; retinal detachment surgery
DOI:10.18240/ijo.2016.06.10
Citation: Gao Y, Chen N, Dong XG, Yuan GQ, Yu B, Xie
LX. Surgical management of fungal endophthalmitis resulting from fungal
keratitis. Int J Ophthalmol 2016;9(6):848-853
INTRODUCTION
Exogenous
fungal endophthalmitis (EFE) has been regarded as a devastating disease with
poor prognosis[1]. Fungal endophthalmitis
resulting from contiguous spread of fungal keratitis is regarded as one of the
classical clinical categories of EFE[2]. There has been a few
studies about this category of fungal endophthalmitis, and the majority of
cases obtained favorable results[2-3]. However, surgeons are
still puzzled, especially when confronted with severe cases presenting a large
corneal ulcer and simultaneous posterior segment involvement. Although
antifungal agents of voriconazole has been widely applied as a new generation
of triazole and shown excellent antifungal activity in ocular infections[4], we believe that surgical treatment also plays an
irreplaceable role in infection control, especially in severe cases of EFE
resulting from keratitis. The microbiology, clinical features, surgical
strategies, and outcomes in a series of cases of EFE secondary to keratitis
were presented and evaluated in our study.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS
In
this retrospective study, all procedures involving human participants were in
accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent was
obtained from the subjects. Medical records of patients with culture-proven EFE
resulting from keratitis treated at our institution from January 2007 to
January 2015 were reviewed.
Fungal
specimens were obtained from corneal scraping specimens, corneal buttons, lens
capsule, hypopyon or vitreous of patients under suspicion of endophthalmitis.
Fungal culture and identification were performed as described previously[5]. Patients with a positive culture result of any of the
specimens and the clinical characteristics of EFE from keratitis were included.
For patients that only suffered from fungal keratitis and hypopyon, positive
culture result of the hypopyon was required for exclusion of aseptic hypopyon from
keratitis.
Topical
antifungal agents were administered in all cases and systemic drugs were given
if necessary after the diagnosis. Indications of different surgical procedures
are described as follows. It was urgent to carry out penetrating keratoplasty
(PKP) if the keratitis was with corneal ulcer, perforation, melting or
large endothelial plaque, otherwise, corneal infection could be
treated by administration of antifungal agents systemically and topically under
close monitoring. But the period was generally not more than half a month.
Anterior chamber washout and antifungal drug injection were always performed
combined with PKP.
Prompt
vitrectomy was carried out when there was evidence of severe posterior segment
infection. But the opaque cornea and adhesion of pupil always made the fundus
invisible, which made it not easy to find evidences. Three methods were mainly
applied for the judgement of posterior segment infection. 1) Ultrasound B mode
evaluation was employed (except for an eye with silicone oil tamponade). The
status of vitreous, retina, and choroid was obtained from the images. The
dynamic changes of vitreous opacity were always good indications of infection
changes. 2) Abscess in the posterior chamber and anterior vitreous might be
detected during PKP. 3) The red reflex of the fundus after PKP implementation
could always be visible, and invisibility of red reflex frequently meant severe
posterior infection. Intravitreal antifungal medication was given at the end of
vitrectomy or after vitreous aspiration for fungal detection.
Lensectomy
was performed when the lens was ruptured, opaque or adhered with plenty of
exudate. When it was impossible to eliminate vitreous abscess completely
through vitrectomy, repeated intravitreal injections and even a second
vitrectomy were required. Interval between two intravitreal injections was
about 3d. Sometimes repeated intracameral washout and antifungal drug
injections were also needed for elimination of massive hypopyon. If the
infection aggravated for poor response to drug and surgery, evisceration of the
eye was performed for unendurable pain.
RESULTS
Demographics, Culture Results, and
Clinical Features Twenty-seven
eyes from 27 patients were included in this study. Nineteen patients (70%) were
men. The mean age was 48.3y. The duration between the onset of symptoms and
visiting to our hospital varied from 4d to 6mo. Agricultural trauma was the
most common (48%) cause of EFE resulting from keratitis, followed by unknown
cause (26%), metal trauma (19%), and corneal graft ulcer (7%) (Table 1).
Case
No. |
Gender/age (a) |
Interval
between onset
of disease to
therapy |
Cause
of disease |
Organism |
Sources
of specimen |
Clinical
features |
Size
of corneal infection (mm2) |
Initial
visual acuity |
1 |
F/31 |
40d |
Unknown |
Fusarium |
Cornea |
FK,
hypopyon, PC empyema |
6×5 |
HM |
2 |
F/35 |
1mo |
Agriculture
trauma |
Fusarium |
Cornea |
FK,
PC empyema , vitreous abscess |
7×7 |
HM |
3 |
F/32 |
24d |
Unknown |
Fusarium |
Cornea,
hypopyon |
FK,
hypopyon |
5×3 |
CF |
4 |
F/45 |
13d |
Unknown |
Fusarium |
Cornea,
hypopyon |
FK,
hypopyon |
6×6 |
HM |
5 |
F/44 |
1.5mo |
Metal
trauma |
Fusarium |
Cornea |
FK
, vitreous abscess, silicone oil tamponade, retinitis |
8×8 |
LP |
6 |
F/47 |
1mo |
Agriculture
trauma |
Fusarium |
Hypopyon,
vitreous |
FK,
hypopyon, vitreous abscess |
3
dots |
LP |
7 |
F/64 |
1mo |
Agriculture
trauma |
Fusarium |
Cornea,
hypopyon |
FK,
hypopyon, vitreous abscess |
6×5 |
HM |
8 |
M/41 |
10d |
Unknown |
Fusarium |
Cornea |
FK,
hypopyon, vitreous abscess |
Entire
cornea |
HM |
9 |
M/58 |
15d |
Unknown |
Fusarium |
Cornea,
lens capsule |
FK,
hypopyon, PC empyema |
4×4 |
HM |
10 |
M/72 |
12d |
Unknown |
Fusarium |
Cornea,
hypopyon |
FK,
hypopyon, vitreous abscess |
Entire
cornea |
LP |
11 |
M/46 |
9d |
Agriculture
trauma |
Fusarium |
Cornea,
hypopyon |
FK,
hypopyon |
Entire
cornea |
HM |
12 |
M/41 |
20d |
Agriculture
trauma |
Fusarium |
Cornea |
FK,
hypopyon, vitreous abscess |
6×5 |
HM |
13 |
F/39 |
1mo |
Agriculture
trauma |
Aspergillus |
Cornea,
hypopyon |
FK,
hypopyon |
5×5 |
CF |
14 |
M/60 |
12d |
Metal
trauma |
Aspergillus |
Vitreous |
FK,
hypopyon, vitreous abscess, retinitis |
8×8 |
HM |
15 |
M/64 |
21d |
Metal
trauma |
Aspergillus |
Vitreous |
FK,
hypopyon, RD |
Entire
cornea |
LP |
16 |
M/44 |
7d |
Metal
trauma |
Aspergillus |
Cornea,
vitreous |
FK
, vitreous abscess, retinitis |
4×3 |
CF |
17 |
M/25 |
3mo |
Metal
trauma |
Aspergillus |
Cornea |
FK,
endothelial plaque, hypopyon, vitreous abscess, silicone oil tamponade,
retinal erosion, RD |
5×4 |
LP |
18 |
M/48 |
22d |
Agriculture
trauma |
Aspergillus |
Cornea,
hypopyon |
FK,
hypopyon |
7×7 |
HM |
19 |
M/74 |
2mo |
Agriculture
trauma |
Alternaria |
Cornea,
hypopyon |
FK,
hypopyon |
3×2 |
CF |
20 |
M/40 |
4d |
Corneal
graft ulcer |
Alternaria |
Cornea,
vitreous |
FK,
vitreous abscess, orbital cellylitis |
Entire
cornea |
NLP |
21 |
M/49 |
6mo |
Agriculture
trauma |
Phialophora |
Vitreous |
FK,
hypopyon, vitreous abscess |
7×5 |
HM |
22 |
M/59 |
50d |
Agriculture
trauma |
Scedosporum
Apiospermum |
Hypopyon |
FK,
hypopyon, vitreous abscess, silicone oil tamponade, retinal erosion |
Entire
cornea |
LP |
23 |
M/60 |
2mo |
Agriculture
trauma |
Rhinocladiella |
cornea |
FK,
anterior and posterior chamber infiltrate |
7×6 |
CF |
24 |
M/35 |
1mo |
Unknown |
Mucor |
Cornea |
FK,
hypopyon, vitreous abscess |
7×6 |
HM |
25 |
M/62 |
15d |
Candida |
Cornea |
FK,
vitreous abscess |
8×8 |
HM |
|
26 |
M/51 |
1mo |
Agriculture
trauma |
Unidentified |
Cornea |
FK,
hypopyon, vitreous abscess |
6×5 |
HM |
27 |
M/48 |
2mo |
Agriculture
trauma |
Unidentified |
Cornea |
FK,
hypopyon, vitreous abscess |
3×3 |
CF |
FK: Fungal keratitis; PC: Posterior
chamber; RD: Retinal detachment; HM: Hand moving; CF: Counting fingers; LP: Light
perception; NLP: No light perception.
There
were 39 positive culture results for the twenty-seven eyes.
They were from samples of corneas, hypopyon, vitreous, and lens capsules,
accounting for 56%, 26%, 15%, and 2.5%, respectively. Causative fungal
pathogens included Fusarium (12 eyes, 44%), Aspergillus (6 eyes, 22%),
Alternaria (2 eyes, 7%), Phialophora (1 eye, 4%), Scedosporum
Apiospermum (1 eye, 4%), Rhinocladiella (1 eye, 4%), Mucor (1 eye, 4%), Candida
(1 eye, 4%), and unidentified species (2 eyes, 7%).
Twenty-one of 27 patients (78%) had fungal
endophthalmitis with posterior segment involvement. Three eyes had silicone oil
tamponade, and 2 eyes had retinal detachment. The corneal infection was larger
than 3 mm×3 mm in 89% of the patients, and 6 of them had the entire cornea and
even sclera involved. The initial visual acuity ranged from no light perception
to counting fingers.
Antifungal Surgical Interventions Twenty-two
eyes (81.5%) underwent PKP. Among the other five eyes receiving no PKP, four
eyes were eviscerated, and one eye with dot infiltration in the cornea was
cured by medical treatment. PKP was performed as the initial surgical procedure
in 77% (17/22) of them. The mean interval between onset of antifungal therapy
and PKP was 4.5d in these operated eyes, and within
3d in 54.5% of them. As a
further procedure for hypopyon elimination, 14 eyes (52%) underwent
intracameral antifungal injection, of which only 3 (21%) required repeated
injections (Table 2).
Table 2 Surgical procedures and final visual acuity in patients
with exogenous fungal endophthalmitis secondary to keratitis
Case
No. |
Interval
between onset of therapy to PKP implementation (d) |
Interval
between onset of therapy to PPV implementation (d) |
No.
of different surgical procedures |
Final
visual acuity and following up period |
|||||
PKP |
ICI |
PPV |
IVI |
CE |
EV |
||||
1 |
2 |
- |
1 |
1 |
0 |
3 |
1 |
0 |
CF,
21mo |
2 |
3 |
3 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
5 |
1 |
0 |
CF,
41mo |
3 |
3 |
- |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
20/32,
5mo |
4 |
5 |
- |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
20/63,
3mo |
5 |
7 |
7 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
HM,
40mo |
6 |
- |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
9 |
1 |
0 |
20/100,
29mo |
7 |
5 |
7 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
5 |
1 |
0 |
20/63,
8mo |
8 |
1 |
5 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
20/125,
33mo |
9 |
2 |
- |
1 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
20/50,
17mo |
10 |
1 |
- |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
NLP |
11 |
5 |
- |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
20/200,
3mo |
12 |
4 |
7 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
10 |
1 |
0 |
2/40,
4mo |
13 |
1 |
- |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
20/200,
12mo |
14 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
NLP,
67mo |
15 |
- |
- |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
NLP |
16 |
16 |
3 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
1 |
0 |
20/63,
13mo |
17 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
6 |
0 |
0 |
20/100,
3mo |
18 |
2 |
- |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
20/63,
41mo |
19 |
16 |
- |
1 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
20/32,
14mo |
20 |
- |
- |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
NLP |
21 |
- |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
NLP |
22 |
- |
- |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
NLP |
23 |
7 |
7 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
CF,
10mo |
24 |
1 |
10 |
1 |
3 |
1 |
7 |
1 |
0 |
20/50,
20mo |
25 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
HM,
33mo |
26 |
5 |
5 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
CF,
4mo |
27 |
11 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
4 |
12 |
1 |
0 |
20/200,
3mo |
ICI: Intracameral
injection; IVI: Intravitreal
injection; CE: Cataract
extraction; EV: Evisceration;
CF; Counting
fingers; HM: Hand moving;
NLP: No light
perception.
Fifteen
eyes (55.6%) underwent pars plana vitrectomy (PPV), and the proportion of eyes
underwent PPV as the initial surgical procedure reduced to 60% (9/15) in
comparison with 77% of PKP. The mean interval between onset of antifungal
therapy to PPV performance was 3.9d; 53% of the eyes had PPV within 3d; 40% of
the eyes had PPV within 1d. Intravitreal injection was given in 59%
of the eyes. Six eyes with the posterior segment involvement did not undergo
intravitreal injections, including 4 eviscerated eyes, 1 silicone oil tamponade
eye with posterior segment infection already controlled, and 1 eye with mild
anterior vitreous abscess. Compared to intracameral injection, the
percentage of eyes which required repeated intravitreal injections rose up to
75%, and the mean number was 4.4 times for each injected eye.
Eleven
eyes (41%) required cataract extractions. Five eyes (18.5%) were eviscerated
finally for aggravation of the disease.
For
the antifungal medication application in the intraocular injection, each
intracamerally injected eye received one kind of drug, voriconazole (5 eyes) or
fluconazole (9 eyes). Fourteen intravitreally injected eyes received one kind
of drug, including voriconazole for 13 eyes and amphotericin B for 1 eye. Two
intravitreally injected eyes received two kinds of drugs of which one was with
voriconazole and fluconazole, and the other was with amphotericin B and
fluconazole.
Visual and Anatomical Outcomes The 100%
preserved eyes were followed up for at least 3mo. The final visual acuity was
20/100 or better in 37% eyes, and more than half eyes (55.6%) achieved visual
acuity of better than counting fingers.
Out
of 22 eyes underwent PKP, the corneal graft was transparent in 10 eyes and
opaque in 11 eyes at the final follow-up (one PKP eye was eviscerated at end of
therapy). Total 16 patients received grafts preserved in the corneal storage
medium, and 5 of the grafts were opaque finally, including one underwent a
second transplantation. The other 6 patients received grafts preserved in
glycerin, and although one of them underwent another transplantation of a graft
preserved in the corneal storage medium, the graft became opaque at the final
follow-up.
One
of the eyes with concurrent retinal detachment achieved retinal reattachment
and the other was eviscerated for progress of the disease. Two of the silicone
oil tamponade eyes received silicone oil removal and the remaining one was also
eviscerated finally.
DISCUSSION
Fungal
keratitis is not rare in China[6], and advanced fungal
keratitis many lead to fungal endophthalmitis. The current study was a
comprehensive report on cases of EFE resulting from corneal fungal infection
with a larger number of cases than ever[2-3], and with microbiology,
clinical features, surgical strategies, and final visual acuity in detail.
Moreover, most cases were seriously diseased with a large fungal focus on
cornea and/or posterior segment of eye involvement.
Xie
et al[5] reported that Fusarium was
the most frequently isolated pathogen in fungal keratitis. In this study,
Fusarium was also confirmed to be the dominant pathogen of EFE resulting from
keratitis. Aspergillus, as another main pathogen of fungal endophthalmitis[2,7],
ranked second among all pathogens. In the culture positive samples, cornea
accounted for over half. Though it is not reality for surgeons to submit all
keratitis corneas, hypopyon, or vitreous abscess samples for culture, this
result could partly indicate that corneal scraping specimens or corneal buttons
might be the most likely samples to obtain positive culture results in EFE
resulting from fungal keratitis. The possible reason might be that cornea was
the tissue where the infection initially spread from. This emphasized the
importance of obtaining corneal scraping samples, especially prior to the
antifungal treatment.
It
was reported that in China, 35.1% of eyes with fungal keratitis required
surgery of PKP[6]. In our series of fungal
endophthalmitis, the PKP ratio rose up to 81.5%. We encountered two types of
corneal opacity during the therapy. One type was a large area of opacity
resulting from corneal ulcer, melting or endothelial plaque, which always
required prompt surgery. The other type was a small scope of infiltration after
injury with chestnut thorns (cases 6, 19, 27, Table 1). In these cases, surgery
was not that urgent, and finally, drug treatment was feasible in case 6 (Table
2), but PKP was performed in the other two cases (although case 19 experienced
a temporary improvement; Table 2). Surgical intervention has been recommended
to be performed after 1wk of medication therapy in fungal keratitis[6,8]. However, when combined with fungal endophthalmitis, PKP
was always performed earlier. The mean time was 4.5d between onset of
antifungal therapy to PKP implementation in our study and over half of the PKP
eyes were within 3d. PKP was able to clear original infection focus and provide
access to evaluation and treatment of intraocular infection. In addition,
lamellar keratoplasty was not applicable in fungal endophthalmitis from
keratitis due to the full-thickness infiltration and high risk of recurrence[9].
Vitrectomy
was an effective and efficient procedure for abscess drainage. Shen et al[10] reported a 75.9% percentage
for vitrectomy application in endogenous fungal endophthalmitis, and the
vitrectomy rate in our exogenous fungal endophthalmitis study was only 55.6%. The
lower vitrectomy rate might be relative to the specific infection expanding way
in our cases. On one hand, 22% patients were only anterior segment of the eye
involved; on the other hand, the opaque cornea damaged the visual access to the
posterior segment and sometimes made surgeons difficult to decide whether the
vitrectomy was required. But we are still in support of a prompt vitrecomy once
we confronted with a large amount of vitreous abscess or treatment failure
after intravitreal injection. However, in eyes with EFE from fungal keratitis,
it was hard to perform the initial vitrectomy completely due to the unclear
media[11], and core vitrectomy was performed in such cases.
Aggressive vitrectomy increased the risks of retinal damage. The media would
get clearer gradually accompanied by effective infection control, which made a
second vitrectomy possible if necessary.
Prognosis
of fungal endophthalmitis with concurrent retinal detachment is usually poor
with severe visual impairment and sometimes phthisis bulbi[12-13]. We successfully conserved
a fungal endophthalmitis eye with concurrent retinal detachment (case 17,
Tables 1, 2) and achieved favorable final visual acuity. In our experience, it
was crucial to determine the time point for retinal reattachment procedure
performance. If the eye was still infected, the substitute of vitreous body
applied for retinal reattachment would be obstruction of further antifungal
surgery, and it was also hard to achieve complete posterior vitreous detachment.
If too late, severe proliferative vitreoretinopathy may occur and obstruct
retinal expansion. We recommend prompt retinal reattachment surgery after
confirmation of infection control. Moreover, we do not recommend silicone oil
tamponade in an uncontrolled endophthalmitis eye. Some previous studies
supported that silicone oil tamponade was antimicrobial and helpful for better
anatomical and functional results in endophthalmitis[14-15]. However, it was recently found
that silicone oil might play a weaker role in antifungal therapy than
antibacterial therapy[16]. It also might be a problem
in the subsequent intravitreal injection because nontoxic concentrations of
intravitreal drugs created toxicity in a silicone oil-filled eye[17].
PKP
and vitrectomy were always performed with simultaneous intraocular injections.
Intraocular injections provided higher drug concentrations than systemic
medication or topical eye drops did, and were frequently employed procedures in
the treatment of endophthalmitis, especially the intravitreal injection[18-19]. They were also commonly
used as the initial antifungal surgery if PKP and PPV were not urgent, and for
the administration of residual intraocular abscess elimination. Repeated
injections were necessary, especially after vitrectomy, because of rapid
clearance of drugs[4]. In the current study, as
high as 75% eyes required repeated intravitreal injections, and the mean
injection number was 4.4 times for each eye. The interval between two
injections was generally around 3d.
Narang
et al[20] regarded corneal infection
as an independent risk factor for final visual outcomes of fungal
endophthalmitis. In our research, we noted that most conserved eyes required
PKP and after that, the status of corneal transparency, graft location, and
corneal astigmatism might impact on the final visual results. EFE is a disease
with both anterior and posterior segments of the eye involved. Collaboration of
surgeons specializing in anterior and posterior segments and appropriate
administration of surgical strategies, such as aggressive multiple intravitreal
injections to keep the concentration of antifungal drugs, prompt PKP after
judgment of treatment failure with drugs, prompt core initial vitrectomy to
remove fungi efficiently but avoid retinal damage, will be greatly beneficial
in salvaging eyes with severe EFE.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The
authors thank Ms. Ping Lin for her editorial assistance, and Shi-Ying Sun for
his work in fungal culture.
Conflicts of Interest: Gao
Y, None; Chen N, None; Dong XG, None; Yuan GQ, None;
Yu B, None; Xie LX, None.
REFERENCES
1 Pflugfelder SC, Flynn
HW Jr, Zwickey TA, Forster RK, Tsiligianni A, Culbertson WW, Mandelbaum S.
Exogenous fungal endophthalmitis. Ophthalmology
1988;95(1):19-30. [CrossRef]
2 Wykoff CC, Flynn
HW Jr, Miller D, Scott IU, Alfonso EC. Exogenous fungal endophthalmitis:
microbiology and clinical outcomes. Ophthalmology
2008;115(9):1501-1507.e1-2.
3 Shen YC, Wang CY, Tsai HY, Lee HN.
Intracameral voriconazole injection in the treatment of fungal endophthalmitis
resulting from keratitis. Am J Ophthalmol
2010;149(6):916-921. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
4 Riddell J 4th, Comer GM, Kauffman CA.
Treatment of endogenous fungal endophthalmitis: focus on new antifungal agents.
Clin Infect Dis 2011;52(5):648-653. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
5 Xie L, Zhai H, Zhao J, Sun S, Shi W,
Dong X. Antifungal susceptibility for common pathogens of fungal keratitis in
Shandong Province, China. Am J Ophthalmol
2008;146(2):260-265. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
6 Xie L, Dong X, Shi W. Treatment of
fungal keratitis by penetrating keratoplasty. Br J Ophthalmol 2001;85(9):1070-1074. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PMC free article]
7 Chakrabarti A, Shivaprakash MR, Singh
R, Tarai B, George VK, Fomda BA, Gupta A. Fungal endophthalmitis: fourteen
years' experience from a center in India. Retina
2008;28(10):1400-1407. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
8 Sanders N. Penetrating keratoplasty
in treatment of fungus keratitis. Am J
Ophthalmol 1970;70(1):24-30. [CrossRef]
9 Xie L, Hu J, Shi W. Treatment failure
after lamellar keratoplasty for fungal keratitis. Ophthalmology 2008;115(1):33-36. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
10 Shen X, Xu G. Vitrectomy for
endogenous fungal endophthalmitis. Ocul
Immunol Inflamm 2009;17(3):148-152. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
11 Bhagat N, Nagori S, Zarbin M.
Post-traumatic Infectious Endophthalmitis. Surv
Ophthalmol 2011;56(3):214-251. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
12 Foster RE, Rubsamen PE, Joondeph BC,
Flynn HW Jr, Smiddy WS. Concurrent endophthalmitis and retinal detachment. Ophthalmology 1994;101(3):490-498. [CrossRef]
13 Lieb DF, Scott IU, Flynn HW Jr,
Miller D, Feuer WJ. Open globe injuries with positive intraocular cultures:
factors influencing final visual acuity outcomes. Ophthalmology 2003;110(8):1560-1566. [CrossRef]
14 Ozdamar A, Aras C, Ozturk R, Akin E,
Karacorlu M, Ercikan C. In vitro antimicrobial activity of silicone oil against
endophthalmitis-causing agents. Retina 1999;19(2):122-126.
[CrossRef]
15 Azad R, Ravi K, Talwar D, Rajpal,
Kumar N. Pars plana vitrectomy with or without silicone oil endotamponade in
post-traumatic endophthalmitis. Graefes
Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2003;241(6):478-483. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
16 Ornek N, Apan T, Oğurel R, Ornek K.
Comparison of the antimicrobial effect of heavy silicone oil and conventional
silicone oil against endophthalmitis-causing agents. Indian J Ophthalmol 2014;62(4):388-391. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PMC free article]
17 Hegazy HM, Kivilcim M, Peyman GA,
Unal MH, Liang C, Molinari LC, Kazi AA. Evaluation of toxicity of intravitreal
ceftazidime, vancomycin, and ganciclovir in a silicone oil-filled eye. Retina 1999;19(6):553-557. [CrossRef]
18 Durand ML. Endophthalmitis. Clin Microbiol Infect 2013;19(3):227-234.
[CrossRef] [PubMed] [PMC free article]
19 Chhablani J. Fungal endophthalmitis.
Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 2011;9(12):1191-1201.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
20 Narang S GA, Gupta V, Dogra MR, Ram
J, Pandav SS, Chakrabarti A. Fungal endophthalmitis following cataract surgery:
clinical presentation, microbiological spectrum, and outcome. Am J Ophthalmol 2001;132(5):609-617. [CrossRef]
[Top]