·Clinical
Research··Current Issue· ·Achieve· ·Search Articles· ·Online Submission· ·About IJO· PMC
Epidemiology
and risk factors of retinoblastoma in Chongqing area
Yu-Qiong Yang, Jia Li, Hong-Feng Yuan
Department
of Ophthalmology, Institute of Surgery Research, Daping Hospital, Third
Military Medical University, Chongqing 400042, China
Co-first
authors: Yu-Qiong
Yang and Jia Li
Correspondence
to:
Hong-Feng Yuan. Department of Ophthalmology, Institute of Surgery Research,
Daping Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing 400042, China.
yhf871@sina.cn
Received: 2015-07-04 Accepted:
2015-10-22
AIM: To
investigate the risk factors of retinoblastoma in Chongqing and offer the bases
for scientific measures.
METHODS:
One hundred and thirty-three retinoblastoma
patients were taken as case group, and 133 children were taken as control group
in 1:1 ratio. The relevant factors were collected from a questionnaire survey
which was made by our research group. First, Chi-square and t-test were used to discuss the various factors, and then the
logistic regression analysis was made by statistics software SPSS17.0 based on
the result of 266 people.
RESULTS:
Single factor analysis results showed the
differences between the two groups were statistically significant (P<0.05) in 17 factors which were
education level of their parents, occupation of their parents, exposure to
harmful chemicals of their parents 6mo before pregnancy, the history of pelvic
inflammatory disease of mother before pregnancy, childbearing history of their
parents, pregnant age of their parents, the medication history of father 6 mo
before pregnancy, living place of their parents, the pollution living place of
mother, hobbies of their parents. Multivariate analysis showed that the living
place of parents, mother who feed pets before pregnancy, and exposure to
harmful chemicals of father before pregnancy were the independent risk factors
of retinoblastoma (P<0.05).
CONCLUSION:
The living place of parents, mother who
feed pets before pregnancy, exposure to harmful chemicals of father before
pregnancy were the risk factors of retinoblastoma which affects the occurrence
of retinoblastoma in a certain extent.
KEYWORDS: Chongqing area; retinoblastoma;
epidemiology; risk factors
DOI:10.18240/ijo.2016.07.08
Citation: Yang YQ, Li J, Yuan HF. Epidemiology and
risk factors of retinoblastoma. Int J
Ophthalmol 2016;9(7):984-988
INTRODUCTION
Retinoblastoma
(RB) is the most common primary intraocular malignancy usually occurring in
childhood, which lead to blind of children by 5%[1-3].
It’s autosomal dominant genetic disease arise from the inner neuroepithelial
layers of the embryonic optic cup. RB occurs in 4 to 8wk of gestation that is
the formation stage of retina, continues grow to infancy, and presents clinical
feature in 6mo[4].
Knudson[5] proposed secondary mutation theory
as the mechanisms of retinoblastoma, is now widely accepted. Little is known
about the risk factors of the life-style and environment related to
retinoblastoma. Orjuela et al[6] reported that decreased intake of
vegetables and fruits during pregnancy and the consequent decreased intake of
nutrients such as folate and lutein/zeaxanthin, necessary for DNA methylation,
synthesis, and retinal function, may increase risk for having a child with
sporadic retinoblastoma. Other risk factors of retinoblastoma is unknown, so
that in order to provide a scientific basis for prevention and treatment of
retinoblastoma, a case control research had been used to detect the related
risk factors of retinoblastoma.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS
Subjects A case-control study was conducted in Chongqing. A
total of 133 patients with retinoblastoma were recruited to the study when they
entered the Department of Ophthalmology at Daping Hospital of Third Military
Medical University, Xi’nan Hospital of Third Military Medical University, the
Children's Hospital Affiliated to Chongqing Medical University. One hundred and
thirty-three cases of healthy children with same gender and age were taken as
control group in 1:1 ratio. Informed consent was obtained from all individual
participants included in the study. The study protocol and informed consent documents were approved by the
Ethics Committee of Research Institute of Surgery and Daping Hospital, Third
Military Medical University.
Diagnostic
Criteria 1) All the patients were examined by Retcam
II, the result of fundus examination conforms to the Intraocular International
Retinoblastoma Classify (IIRC). 2) Color Doppler suggests blood flow signals in
the tumor. Computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) suggests
calcification in tumor.
Data
Collection The medical records of case group and
control group were obtained from unified questionnaire from their parents. All
the investigation through face-to-face or telephone interviews were done by one
trained investigator.
Analysis The following items obtained from questionnaire were
analyzed as risk factors: family general condition classified into groups of
incomes, education level, occupation of parents; family history classified into
groups of retinoblastoma history, genetic
disease, tumor; past and contact history of parents classified as radiation
exposure before pregnancy, harmful chemicals exposure before pregnancy, pet
contact during pregnancy, human papilloma virus (HPV) infection, menstrual,
cervicitis, pelvic infection; obstetrical history of parents classified as
marital history, childbearing; the situation of parents during pregnancy
classified as age, abortion, pregnancy reaction, medication history, cold
history; habits of parents classified as residence (city or village), noise,
pollution, diet, hobbies, cigarette smoking, alcohol drinking.
Statistical
Analysis Univariate logistic regression analysis was
performed to examine the predictive effect of each factor on the risk for
retinoblastoma. The 19 potential risk factors for case group were compared with
those of control group using Fisher’s exact test, with the software package
SPSS 13.0; P<0.05 was considered
statistically significant. Significant risk factors were entered into a forward
selection multivariate logistic regression analysis. The involvement of the
various factors in the development of retinoblastoma was analyzed using
multiple logistic regression analysis with the SPSS statistical software
package. The logistic model is a multivariate analysis model by which the odd
ratio (OR, a good approximate value for the relative risk) of risk factors is
calculated by logit transformation of the probability of the development of the
end point. Using this model, the degree of involvement of each factor in the
occurrence of RB could be estimated. When the 95% confidence interval (CI) of
the relative risk of a given factor does not include, the value is significant
(P<0.05).
RESULTS
Demographic
Characteristic of the Two Groups The design was comply to the requirement in
both group which is comparable.
In the research, the age was not
significantly difference between case group and control group [51.51±55.98 (SD) vs 64.89±48.27 (SD)mo, P>0.05].
Analysis
of Risk Factors Risk factors of retinoblastoma included education level of their parents, occupation of their parents,
exposure to harmful chemicals of their parents 6mo before pregnancy, pelvic
inflammatory history of mother before pregnancy, childbearing history of their
parents, pregnant age of their parents, the medication history of father 6mo
before pregnancy, residence of their parents, the pollution living place of
mother, hobbies of their parents. Multivariate analysis showed that the
residence of parents, mother who feed pets before pregnancy, exposure to harmful
chemicals of father before pregnancy were significantly difference between case
group and the controls (P<0.05).
The results are shown in Table 1.
Table 1 Risk factors of retinoblastoma
n (%)
Items |
Classification |
Case
group (n=133) |
Control
group (n=133) |
χ² |
P |
Basic situation of
families |
|||||
Education level of father |
≥High school |
51 (38.35) |
102 (76.69) |
40.0177 |
<0.001 |
<High school |
82 (61.65) |
31 (23.31) |
|||
Education level of mother |
≥High school |
51 (38.35) |
99 (74.44) |
32.5299 |
<0.001 |
<High school |
82 (61.65) |
34 (25.56) |
|||
Occupation of father |
Worker |
17 (12.78) |
43 (32.33) |
79.3578 |
<0.001 |
Farmer |
112 (84.21) |
55 (41.35) |
|||
Other |
4 (3.01) |
35 (26.32) |
|||
Occupation of mother |
Worker |
21 (15.79) |
54 (40.60) |
56.3142 |
<0.001 |
Farmer |
94 (70.68) |
43 (32.33) |
|||
Other |
18 (13.53) |
36 (27.07) |
|||
Past and contact
history |
|||||
Exposure to harmful chemicals of father 6mo before
pregnancy |
N |
56 (42.11) |
10 (7.52) |
42.6406 |
<0.001 |
Y |
77 (57.89) |
123 (92.48) |
|||
Exposure to harmful chemicals of mother 6mo before
pregnancy |
N |
89 (66.92) |
10 (7.52) |
26.8602 |
<0.001 |
Y |
44 (33.08) |
123 (92.48) |
|||
Pelvic inflammatory history of mother before pregnancy |
N |
119 (89.47) |
130 (97.74) |
7.6036 |
0.0058 |
Y |
14 (10.53) |
3 (2.26) |
|||
Obstetrical history |
|
|
|
|
|
Father |
1 |
61 (45.86) |
93 (69.92) |
15.7922 |
0.0001 |
≥2 |
72 (54.14) |
40 (30.08) |
|||
Mother |
1 |
64 (48.12) |
96 (72.18) |
16.0604 |
0.0001 |
≥2 |
69 (51.88) |
37 (27.82) |
|||
Characteristics of
pregnancy |
|
|
|
|
|
Pregnant age of father |
≤20 |
5 (3.76) |
2 (1.50) |
5.0180 |
0.0251 |
20-35 |
75 (56.39) |
61 (45.86) |
|||
≥35 |
53 (39.85) |
70 (52.63) |
|||
Pregnant age of mother |
≤20 |
23 (17.29) |
9 (6.77) |
7.1077 |
0.0286 |
20-30 |
81 (60.90) |
94 (70.68) |
|||
≥30 |
29 (21.80) |
30 (22.56) |
|||
Medication history
of father before pregnancy |
N |
121 (90.98) |
131 (98.50) |
7.5397 |
0.006 |
Y |
12 (9.02) |
2 (1.50) |
|||
Living, eating and
habits |
|||||
Living place of father |
City |
51 (38.35) |
103 (77.44) |
43.8063 |
<0.001 |
Suburban
or village |
82 (61.65) |
30 (22.56) |
|||
Living place of mother |
City |
49 (36.84) |
105 (78.95) |
49.8884 |
<0.001 |
Suburban
or village |
84 (63.16) |
28 (21.05) |
|||
Mother who live in polluted area |
No
pollution |
115 (86.47) |
124 (93.23) |
4.1814 |
0.0409 |
Pollution |
18 (13.53) |
9 (6.77) |
|||
Habit of father |
Table
games |
25 (18.80) |
12 (9.02) |
32.2861 |
<0.001 |
Reading |
2 (1.50) |
9 (6.77) |
|||
Surfing
on line |
24 (18.05) |
56 (42.11) |
|||
Open
field activity |
74 (55.64) |
42 (31.58) |
|||
Habit of mother |
Table
games |
12 (9.02) |
2 (1.50) |
24.0151 |
0.0001 |
Reading |
7 (5.26) |
8 (6.02) |
|||
Surfing
on line |
18 (13.53) |
48 (36.09) |
|||
Open
field activity |
89 (66.92) |
67 (50.38) |
|||
Father who feed pets |
N |
105 (78.95) |
124 (93.23) |
11.333 |
0.001 |
Y |
28 (21.05) |
9 (6.77) |
|||
Mother who feed pets |
N |
93 (69.92) |
117 (87.97) |
13.029 |
0.000 |
Y |
40 (30.08) |
16 (12.03) |
Y:
Yes; N: No.
Multivariate
Logistic Regression Analysis of Risk Factors On multivariate analysis, living place (OR=0.262, 95%CI:
0.146 to 0.469), mother who feed pets before pregnancy (OR=0.428, 95%CI: 0.207
to 0.887), exposure to harmful chemicals of father before pregnancy (OR=0.165, 95%CI:
0.076 to 0.357) were the independent risk factors of retinoblastoma (P<0.05). The results are shown in Table
2.
Table 2 Logistic
regression analysis to identify risk factors associated with retinoblastoma
Risk factors |
B |
S.E. |
Wald |
df |
Sig. |
Exp (B) (95%CI) |
Living place |
-1.339 |
0.297 |
20.324 |
1 |
0.000 |
0.262
(0.146 to 0.469) |
Mother who feed pets before pregnancy |
-0.848 |
0.372 |
5.204 |
1 |
0.023 |
0.428
(0.207 to 0.887) |
Exposure to harmful chemicals of father
before pregnancy |
-1.803 |
0.395 |
20.865 |
1 |
0.000 |
0.165
(0.076 to 0.357) |
Constant |
1.083 |
0.198 |
29.963 |
1 |
0.000 |
|
B: Regression coefficient; S.E.: Standard
error; Wald: Chi-square value; df: Degree
of freedom; Sig.: Significance conspicuousness;
Exp (B) (95%CI): Odd ratio values (dominance ratio).
DISCUSSION
This study demonstrates
that retinoblastoma results for the interaction of many factors, which includes
residence of parents, mother who feed pets during pregnancy, exposure to
harmful chemicals of father 6mo before pregnancy. Their OR values were 0.262,
0.428, 0.165, which indicated that the incidence of RB respectively increased
by 3.82 (1/0.262) times, 2.34 (1/0.428) times and 6.06 (1/0.165) times. Father
exposed to harmful chemicals 6mo before pregnancy has the greatest effect on
the incidence of RB, second for the parents’ living place, third for mother who
feed pets during pregnancy. The results showed that the occurrence of
retinoblastoma is closely related to the living environment. The analysis of
risk factors and preventive strategy are shown as follows.
Father
Exposed to Harmful Chemicals 6mo Before Pregnancy About 80% tumors are caused by the external
environment, two-thirds are chemical carcinogens. The research showed that father of the patients were
contact with paint, leather equipment, decoration, electronic accessories at
work, which included 18 (13.53%) cases exposured on benzene, 8 (6.02%) cases
exposured on formaldehyde, 5 (3.76%) cases contact with zinc, manganese and
other heavy metals. The WTO has classified Benzene (BZ) as a known human carcinogen based upon both
human and animal evidence, used in the manufacture of plastics, detergents,
pesticides, and other chemicals[7-10]. BZ is able to induce many different kinds of genetic damage such as
point mutations, DNA adducts, oxidative DNA damage, structural chromosomal aberrations (CA), numerical CA, DNA methylation, which may cause cancer[11-13]. Formaldehyde is another
carcinogen which is genotoxic and induces both DNA damage and chromosome
changes, frequently expressed as DNA-protein
crosslinks (DPCs), CA, sister
chromatid exchanges
(SCEs), and micronuclei (MN). A large number of studies
have demonstrated that these
alterations could cause cancer[14-16]. A
report demonstrated that certain environment caused DNA
methylation which led to changes in epigenetics and then passed on to offspring[17-19]. In our survey, father
exposed to chemicals is one of the risk factors of retinoblastoma that may
because father exposed to chemicals induce to genetic
damage which destroyed the
normal transcription activity of the genes that cause epigenetic changes and
pass on to offspring.
The
Living Place of Parents In our survey, 51 cases of patients’ father
and 49 cases of patients’ mother living in the city, accounted for 38.35% and 36.84% respectively,
which is lower than the urbanization rate
of permanent resident population (56.98%) in Chongqing. Eleven cases of
father and 10 cases of mother living in the noise pollution areas, accounted
for 8.8% and 8.0% respectively. Seventeen cases of father and 18 cases of mothers
living in the pollution area, accounted for 13.6% and 13.53% respectively. The
pollution sources are mainly from types of mines, waste dumps (station), high
tension line and satellite signals. From the point of parents’ occupation, more
than 50% were engaged in primary industry, and at the end of 2012 first
industry professionals accounted for only 4.48% in Chongqing. The rate of
respondents engaged in the primary industry is significantly higher than the
average level of Chongqing, so was the urbanization rate. The result reveals
that respondents were derived from the underdeveloped areas, the morbidity of
RB is related to the economic level. The more backward areas, the higher the
incidence of RB will happen; the more developed economic, the less incidence of
RB occurs. This may be related to the lack of nutritional supplement, medical
care and service that pregnant women got during pregnancy.
Mother
Feed Pets During Pregnancy Our survey shows that 30.08% patients’
mother raising pets during pregnancy, mainly for cats and dogs. Cats are
carriers of toxoplasma. Pregnant women who infected with toxoplasma would cause
miscarriage, premature birth, stillbirth and teras. The average infection rate
of toxoplasma in domestic pregnant women is about 8.16%[20],
which will cause congenital malformation. These abnormalities including
anencephaly, anophthalmos, acheiropodia, no anus, auricle defect, genital
defect and toes hypoplasia. Until recently, there is no report about toxoplasma
infect will cause retinoblastoma. Shetty et
al[21] gave evidence that HPV is one of
the nosogenesis of sporadic retinoblastoma, and in our research there is one
case whose mother infected HPV during pregnancy. Mother who feed pets during
pregnancy is one of the risk factors in our survey, that may due to the
infection of viruses or parasite while contacting with pets which is the
carrier of various of viruses or parasite, ultimately causing chromosome loss
or mutations appeared in the process of fetal development.
In conclusion, due to the high risk factors
of retinoblastoma, we should adopt integrated interventions. A targeted
prevention health education of retinoblastoma can improve the health care
knowledge and the awareness of cancer of people, changing their lifestyle and
habits in order to reduce morbidity, mortality and improve the quality of life.
1) In everyday life or work, we should avoid exposure to toxic chemicals; if it
must be, protective measures should be taken, such as wearing protective
clothing to avoid direct contact with toxic chemicals, reduce exposure time,
regularly body check and so on. 2) In diet, expert suggests that less pickled
vegetables, leftovers and fried foods should be taken; more green vegetables,
fruit and other food which could help prevent cancer should be taken. Take
enough folic acid and necessary nutrition that fetal development needed during
pregnancy. Keep fresh light diet, good mood, no smoking, less drinking, fit
exercise and make regular prenatals check. 3) Protecting the environment, avoiding
the emission of harmful substances. For polluting areas, strategies should be
taken to solve the problems. 4) For pregnant women, direct or indirect contact
with pets should be avoided, prenatal examination with various of virus should
be taken conventionally.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Thanks are due to professor Yang PZ (The First
Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University) and Professor Pi LH
(Chongqing Medical University Affiliated Children’S Hospital) for assistance
with the case collection.
Conflicts of Interest: Yang YQ, None; Li J, None; Yuan HF,
None.
REFERENCES
1 Vaizovic LM, Murray TG, Aziz-Sultan MA, Schefler AC, Wolfe SQ,
Hess D, Fernandes CE, Dubovy SR. Supraselective intra-arterial chemotherapy:
evaluation of treatment-related complications in advanced retinoblastoma. Clin Ophthalmol 2011;5:171-176.
2 Vandhana S, Deepa PR, Jayanthi U, Biswas J, Krishnakumar S.
Clinico-pathological correlations of fatty acid synthase expression in
retinoblastoma: an indian cohort study. Exp
Mol Pathol 2011;90(1):29-37. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
3 Peterson EC, Elhammady MS, Quintero-Wolfe S, Murray TG,
Aziz-Sultan MA. Selective ophthalmic artery infusion of chemotherapy for
advanced intraocular retinoblastoma: initial experience with 17 tumors. J Neurosurg 2011;114(6):1603-1608. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
4 Graw J. Eye development.
Curr Top Dev Biol 2010;90:343-386. [CrossRef]
5 Gaikwad N, Vanniarajan A, Husain A, Jeyaram I, Thirumalairaj K,
Santhi R, Muthukkaruppan V, Kim U. Knudson's hypothesis revisited in Indian
retinoblastoma patients. Asia Pac J Clin
Oncol 2015;11(4):299-307. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
6 Orjuela MA, Titievsky L, Liu X, Ramirez-Ortiz M, Ponce-Castaneda
V, Lecona E, Molina E, Beaverson K, Abramson DH, Mueller NE. Fruit and
vegetable intake during pregnancy and risk for development of sporadic
retinoblastoma. Cancer Epidemiol
Biomarkers Prev 2005;14(6):1433-1440. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
7 Lombardi C, Ganguly A, Bunin GR, Azary S, Alfonso V, Ritz B,
Heck JE. Maternal diet during pregnancy and unilateral retinoblastoma. Cancer Causes Control 2015;26(3):387-397.
[CrossRef] [PubMed] [PMC free article]
8 Pottenger LH, Andrews LS, Bachman AN, Boogaard PJ, Cadet J,
Embry MR, Farmer PB, Himmelstein MW, Jarabek AM, Martin EA, Mauthe RJ, Persaud
R, Preston RJ, Schoeny R, Skare J, Swenberg JA, Williams GM, Zeiger E, Zhang F,
Kim JH. An organizational approach for the assessment of DNA adduct data in
risk assessment: case studies for aflatoxin B1, tamoxifen and vinyl chloride. Crit Rev Toxicol 2014;44(4):348-391. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
9 Bansal S, Leu AN, Gonzalez FJ, Guengerich FP, Chowdhury AR,
Anandatheerthavarada HK, Avadhani NG. Mitochondrial targeting of cytochrome
P450 (CYP) 1B1 and its role in polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon-induced
mitochondrial dysfunction. J Biol Chem 2014;289(14):9936-9951.
[CrossRef] [PubMed] [PMC free article]
10 Sun JL, Zeng H, Ni HG. Halogenated polycyclic aromatic
hydrocarbons in the environment. Chemosphere 2013;90(6):1751-1759. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
11 De Palma G, Manno M. Metabolic polymorphisms and biomarkers of
effect in the biomonitoring of occupational exposure to low-levels of benzene:
State of the art. Toxicol Lett
2014;231(2):194-204. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
12 Enguita FJ, Leitão AL. Hydroquinone: environmental pollution,
toxicity, and microbial answers. Biomed
Res Int 2013;2013:542168. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PMC free article]
13 Wagner M, Bolm-Audorff U, Hegewald J, Fishta A, Schlattmann P,
Schmitt J, Seidler A. Occupational polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon exposure and
risk of larynxcancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Occup Environ Med 2015;72(3):226-233. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
14 Andersen ME, Clewell HJ 3rd, Bermudez E, Dodd DE, Willson GA,
Campbell JL, Thomas RS. Formaldehyde: integrating dosimetry, cytotoxicity, and
genomics to understand dose-dependent transitions for an endogenous compound. Toxicol Sci 2010;118(2):716-731. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
15 Kim KH, Jahan SA, Lee JT. Exposure to formaldehyde and its
potential human health hazards. J Environ
Sci Health C Environ Carcinog Ecotoxicol Rev 2011;29(4):277-299. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
16 Logue JM, McKone TE, Sherman MH, Singer BC. Hazard assessment
of chemical air contaminants measured in residences. Indoor Air 2011;21(2):92-109. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
17 Detmar J, Rabaglino T, Taniuchi Y, Oh J, Acton BM, Benito A,
Nunez G, Jurisicova A. Embryonic loss due to exposure to polycyclic aromatic
hydrocarbons is mediated by Bax. Apoptosis
2006;11(8):1413-1425. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
18 Waleraland RA, Jirtle RL. Transposable elements: targets for
early nutritional effects on epigenetic gene regulation. Mol cell Biol 2003;23(15):5293-5300. [CrossRef]
19 Detmar J, Jurisicova A. Embryonic resorption and polycyclic
aromatic hydrocarbons: putative immune-mediated mechanisms. Syst Biol Reprod Med 2010;56(1):3-17. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
20
Zhang QQ, Cheng JZ. Analysis of anti-toxoplasma antibody among pregnant women. Chinese Journal of Microecology 2014;
26(1):90-92.
21 Shetty OA, Naresh KN, Banavali SD, Shet T, Joshi R, Qureshi S,
Mulherkar R, Borges A, Desai SB. Evidence for the presence of high risk human
papillomavirus in retinoblastomatissue from nonfamilial retinoblastoma in
developing countries. Pediatr Blood
Cancer 2012;58(2):185-190. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[Top]