The impact of combined oral contraceptives on ocular tissues: a review of ocular effects

Marilita M. Moschos, Eirini Nitoda

Department of Ophthalmology, Medical School, National &Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece

INTRODUCTION

Correspondence to: Marilita M. Moschos. Department of Ophthalmology, Medical School, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece 6, Ikarias street, Ekali 14578,Athens, Greece. moschosmarilita@yahoo.fr

Received: 2016-04-23 Accepted: 2017-07-10

Abstract● The aim of this manuscript is to review the action and adverse effects of combined oral contraceptives (COCs) on ocular tissues. The percentage of unwanted pregnancies and the subsequent abortions make contraception crucial worldwide. Over 100 million women around the world use common contraceptive methods, including intrauterine devices, combined estrogen and progestin oral contraceptives, as well as progestin only preparations(oral contraceptives, implants or injections). COCs are widely used for contraception, but they are also indicated in menorrhagia, endometriosis, acne and hirsutism, fibroid uterus and premenstrual syndrome. However, they have been associated with high rates of cardiovascular events,venous thromboembolic disease, ischemic strokes and breast cancer. The incidence of COCs-related ocular complications is estimated to be 1 in 230 000, including dry eye symptoms, corneal edema, lens opacities and retinal neuro-ophthalmologic or vascular complications.We may infer that the serious ocular complications of COCs can be prevented by eliminating the estrogen dosage and choosing third-generation progestins. In any case, doctors should take into consideration the systemic and ocular history of the patients before selecting any method of contraception.

● KEYWORDS: adverse effects; ocular complications; oral contraceptives

DOI:10.18240/ijo.2017.10.19

Citation: Moschos M, Nitoda E. The impact of combined oral contraceptives on ocular tissues: a review of ocular effects. Int J Ophthalmol 2017;10(10):1604-1610

The prevalence of unintended pregnancies in the United States approaches the 50% of total pregnancies, being at least four times higher than some countries in Europe and Japan[1]. The correlation of unwanted pregnancies with abortion, especially around adolescence, makes contraception crucial. Common contraceptives methods include intrauterine devices, combined estrogen and progestin hormonal contraception, as well as progestin only preparations (oral contraceptives, implants or injections). Over 100 million women around the world use hormonal contraceptive methods,whereas 93 million of them use combined oral contraceptives(COCs)[2].

The biological actions of progesterone are regulated by its receptors, which belong in a superfamily of almost 50 ligand-activated nuclear transcription factors[1-3]. This steroid receptor family includes the progesterone, estrogen, androgen,glucocorticoid and mineralocorticoid receptors, which are hormone-activated transcription factors, sharing a high level of structural and functional similarity[3]. Progestins suppress ovulation, whereas progesterone is responsible for the embryo implantation, the protection of the myometrium and endometrium, the breast development and differentiation[1-4].

However, selective progesterone receptor modulators have been associated with adverse effects, including liver toxicity, ovarian cysts and elevated prolactin levels[4]. The first generation of synthetic progestins seems to promote vascular inflammation,atherosclerosis and angiogenesis, favoring the production of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)[3]. On the other hand, progesterone and the fourth generation of synthetic progestins display vasodilatory activity via nitric oxide (NO)accumulation[3]. Estrogens are composed of two isoforms: the ERa and ERb. The ERa seems to contribute to the negative feedback of estrogens, whereas ERb interferes in luteinizing hormone (LH) surge during ovulation and the transcriptional activity of ERa[5-6]. Estrogens contraceptives primarily serve to regulate bleeding and alter secretions and cellular structures of endometrium, along with inhibiting follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and preventing formation of the dominant follicle[1].

COCs are widely indicted for contraception, menorrhagia,endometriosis, acne and hirsutism, fibroid uterus and premenstrual syndrome[7]. However, the incidence of venous thromboembolic disease in healthy women of reproductive age receiving COCs is increased from 4-5/10 000 women to 9-10/10 000, being aggravated by the presence of obesity,smoking, alcohol consumption and positive family or personal history[8]. The anti-estrogenic activity of progestins was estimated to be responsible for COCs-induced modifications of prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time(aPTT), fibrinogen, D-dimers as well as protein S, favoring a hypercoagulative state[9]. Although the risk for venous thromboembolic disease is approximately three-fold higher in COCs users, compared to controls, it is eliminated along with the duration of use[10]. Beaber et al[11] highlighted that COCs are associated with high breast cancer risk (predominantly in ER+ than ER− breast cancer) among women of 20-49 years old. Visual disturbances in women receiving COCs also seem to have cardiovascular background, being related to of the expression of the progesterone receptors in ocular tissues. The review aims at summarizing the ocular effects of COCs.

OCULAR EFFECTS OF ORAL CONTRACEPTIVES

The incidence of ocular complications, among women who receive birth control pills, is estimated to be 1 in 230 000,including dry eye symptoms, corneal disturbances, lens opacities and retinal neuro-ophthalmologic or vascular complications(Table 1)[12].

Alterationss in Ocular Surface Oral contraceptives have been related to corneal edema, which is usually asymptomatic[13].However, contact lenses users may manifest discomfort and intolerance, which are possibly attributed to increased permeability of the lens and vascular dilatation[13-15]. Although intolerance has been described in contact lens users, recent studies revealed that oral contraceptives do not affect tear physiology. The latter is influenced by pituitary hormones,estrogens, androgens, which increase tears volume and protein levels, and progestins, which have been found to inhibit androgen activity[16]. Moreover, estrogens have been related to decreased lipid production and size of sebaceous glands,resulting in low tear secretion[16-17]. The impact of gonadal hormones is more prominent on goblet cells, resulting in mucus secretion alterations[16].

Tomlinson et al’s[16] study observed no differences in ocular discomfort level, tear film structure, evaporation and tear turnover rate, non-invasive tear thinning time, tear volume and tear protein levels, between controls and young women receiving oral contraceptives treatment. Contrariwise, topical estrogens have been found to ameliorate the symptoms of post menopausal women with keratoconjunctivitis sicca.This beneficial effect of estrogens on lacrimal gland has been related to nitric oxide synthase (NOS) stimulation and the subsequent vasodilation[16]. Recently, Chen et al[17] also noted that no differences in tear osmolarity were measured neither between the follicular and luteal phases of the menstrual cycle nor between controls and young women receiving oral contraceptives. Although, tear osmolarity was not affected in women using oral contraception along with contact lens, the dry eye symptoms, as assessed by Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) and Symptom Assessment iN Dry Eye(SANDE) questionnaires, were more intense in this group[17].Moreover, Rahimi Darabad et al[18] noted that even the complete absence of estrogens did not result in inflammation of lacrimal gland or tear deficiency. On the other hand,Mostafa et al[19] observed that, when genetically predisposed to Sjögren’s syndrome mice were ovariectomized, the symptoms of the disease were accelerated. However, the use of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) eliminated these symptoms.Sacchetti et al[20] suggested that both estrogens and androgens levels were elevated in males with vernal keratoconjunctivitis.Furthermore, estrogens have been associated with alterations in corneal thickness and biomechanics, due to the stimulation of matrix metalloproteinases, collagenases and glycosaminoglycans[21]. The subsequent accumulation of water results in weakening of the collagen network, increase of the corneal interfibrillar space and mechanical expansion of the crosslinks between the collagen[21]. Moreover, the inter fibrillar cohesion induced by proteoglycans seems to be eliminated by estrogens activity[21]. Their corneal stiffness-reducing effect is minimal under normal conditions, but it is enhanced after weakening procedures, such as photorefractive keratectomy(PRK) and laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK).The risk of keratectasia after LASIK is ninefold higher in women[21].

Disturbances of the Anterior Segment of the Eye Faust and Tyler[22] noted that there was no difference in prevalence of glaucoma between patients receiving oral contraceptives and control group, whereas lens pathology was observed at 4% of control individuals compared to 1.5% of patients under contraception. A more recent study of Abramov et al[23] revealed no differences in intraocular pressure (IOP),vertical and horizontal cup-to-disc (C/D) ratios, or glaucoma between controls and women receiving HRT. Drill et al[24]observed equal corneal and lenticular opacities frequency between control group and women treated with COCs. Two cases of hypercupremia, which led to copper corneal deposits at Descemet’s membrane, have been reported among women who received estrogen-based oral contraceptives[25]. Gong et al[26] found that the spherical and cylindrical lens, the axis,the interpupillary distance and the vision exhibited statistically significant differences during the menstrual cycle, according to the serum estradiol (E2) levels. The visual acuity was higher during the 14th and 28th day, where E2 levels were maximum,compared to those on the 2nd or 3rd days, where E2 levels were eliminated[26].

Table 1 Ocular effects of contraceptives

αSMA: Perivascular α-smooth muscle actin; Bax: Apoptosis regulator BAX or bcl-2-like protein; Bcl-2: B-cell lymphoma 2; C/D ratio:Cup-to-disc ratio; E2: Estradiol; ER: Estrogen; H2O2: Hydrogen peroxide; HDL: High density lipoprotein; IL: Interleukin; IOP: Intraocular pressure; MDA: Malondiadehyde; NADPH: Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate; NOS: Nitric oxide synthase; PDGF: Plateletderived growth factor; RGCs: Retinal ganglion cells; ROS: Reactive oxygen species; SOD2: Superoxide dismutase 2; TNF-α: Tumor necrosis factor-alpha; VEGF-D: Vascular endothelial growth factor D.

Severe Ocular Complications Related to Combined Oral Contraceptives The severe ocular complications induced by oral contraceptives can be neuroophthalmologic or vascular.Neuroophthalmologic complications include 6th cranial nerve paralysis, parietal syndrome, hemianopsia, and retrobulbar neuritis[27]. Papillary edema, due to unilateral optic neuritis or benign intracranial hypertension, occurs in several reports[27-28]. Central retinal artery or vein occlusion, intraocular hemorrhages, aneurysms, macular or papillary edema and acute ischemic optic neuropathy, are vascular complications,which may be associated with thrombosis of the cerebral vessels or limited to the retinal vessels[27-30]. The consequences can be temporary or permanent. Color vision disturbances have been also described in women receiving oral contraceptives,especially when diabetes mellitus coexists[28].

A case of woman with unilateral proptosis, haemorrhagic retinopathy and increased IOP was described by Jaais and Habib[31]. During the examination, right lid edema, injection with chemosis and dilated conjunctival and episcleral vessels were found, whereas the visual acuity was 6/6. Non-filling of the right superior ophthalmic vein and collaterals were detected during the right orbital venogram. The proptosis and the elevated IOP were retreated with timolol 0.5% drops,after the cessation of COCs[31]. Retinal hemorrhages observed in COCs users may be associated with VEGF-D stimulation and consequential vascular remodeling and vasodilation[32].The observed vascular fragility and angiogenesis have been attributed to the reduction of perivascular α-smooth muscle actin (αSMA) and the over expression of endometrial tissue factor at the bleeding sites. The αSMA is responsible for the loss of perivascular support cells, including pericytes and vascular smooth muscle cells[32].

Li and Fu[33] described a bilateral ischemic papillopathy and optic atrophy in a woman who received COCs. Vastag and Tornóczky[34] reported a case of unilateral arterial retinal occlusion in a woman who received COCs (1.0 mg ethinodiole-diacetate and 0.05 mg aethynyloestradiole) for 4.5y. The lesions were correlated with vasoconstriction and thrombocyte aggregation,due to decreased antithrombin III and high density lipoprotein(HDL) cholesterol levels, shorten heparin-thrombin coagulation time, and elevated fibrinogen and thromboxan A2 concentrations[34]. Two cases of unilateral arterial retinal occlusions in women taking COCs were also delineated by Leff[12]. The first woman manifested fl ashing lights, dull frontal headache and poor perfusion of the inferior temporal branch artery with ipsilateral inferior retinal edema. The ipsilateral decreased visual acuity was rehabilitated and the symptoms were disappeared after the discontinuation of the COCs. The second woman had normal visual acuity although the vision was diminished in the superior visual field of the left eye[12].

Schmidt and Kramer-Zucker[35] presented a 22-year-old woman who used COCs (0.03 mg ethinylestradiol and 2 mg chlormadinonacetate) for several months before experiencing monocular visual disturbances. Unilateral hemicentral(superior) retinal artery obstruction combined with elevated thrombin-antithrombin complex and low free protein S were the causes of sudden visual loss observed in this young woman[35]. Tortuosity of venules around the macular area and alteration of the pigment epithelium were the fundoscopic lesions described by Gombos et al[36] in a woman with unilateral retinal vascular occlusion, secondary to the use of oral contraceptives. Combined central retinal artery and vein occlusion was observed in a 40-year-old woman who received oral contraceptives for a period of four years. The occlusion was complicated with neovascular glaucoma and one year later the eye was enucleated[37].

COCs have been found to be implicated in atherogenesis,accelerating the proliferation of human arterial smooth muscle cells. This mitogenicity has been related to the increase of platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) concentrations[38].Asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA), which is a risk marker of atherosclerosis and endothelial dysfunction, has also been found to be eliminated by estrogens, COCs and HRT[39].Both ADMA and its stereoisomer symmetric dimethylarginine(SDMA) represent endogenous competitive inhibitors of NOS and vasodilation. Interestingly, ADMA levels varied at different phases of menstrual cycle, according to the estrogens levels, but they are stable in women receiving COCs[39].

Moreover, progesterone induces NOS and cyclooxygenase(COX) stimulation, interfering in mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPK) and phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K)signaling pathways. NOS and COX systems also seem to interact[40]. Progestin levonorgestrel has been found to antagonize ethinyl estradiol induced-vasodilation, ameliorating the vasoconstrictor sensitivity to α1- and α2-receptor agonists[41].In addition, medroxyprogesterone acetate has been implicated in endothelial dysfunction, modifying estrogens action[42].Estrogens modify the concentrations of haemostasis proteins in blood, whereas eserogen receptor 1 (ER1) haplotype has been related to an increased risk of myocardial infarction and ischaemic heart disease in postmenopausal women. However,ER1 does not affect haemostasis and inflammation risk markers of arterial and venous thrombosis[43].

Contrary to the previous studies, Drill et al[44] observed no retinal damage, including papilledema, venous dilatation, and venous or arterial retinal thrombosis, in animals (dogs and monkeys) treated with COCs. However, permanent retinal damage due to COCs-induced hypertension has been also reported[45]. We may infer that the serious ocular complications of COCs can be prevented by eliminating the estrogen dosage and choosing third-generation progestins. Furthermore, post-menopausal HRT seems to act as protective factor for retinal vascular complications[46]. Before deciding the method of contraception, doctors should have in mind that a history of migraine or intraocular vascular disease is considered as contraindication for oral contraceptive therapy[47]. Besides retinal vascular complications, COCs have been associated with the development of pigmentary retinopathy in a 20-yearold woman. The woman complained of sudden blurring of vision in the right eye with ipsilateral macular pigmentary mottling, which was prominent in fluorescein angiography.The cessation of treatment resulted in recession of ocular symptoms, without affecting the ophthalmoscopic and fluorescein angiographic findings[48].

beneficial Effects of Estrogens and Progesterone in the Eye It has been found that 17-β-estradiol suspends the expression of interleukin (IL)-6, IL-1, tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α),and metalloproteinases, protecting corneal collagen from degradation[49-50]. In addition, 17-β-estradiol seems to neutralize H2O2 and eliminate catalase activity, preventing oxidative stress and cataractogenesis[51]. However, Aina et al[52] supported that estrogens only or combined estrogen-progestogen HRT exhibited small protective effect against cataract development.The detection of ERa, ERb and G protein-coupled estrogen receptor (GPER) as well as estradiol binding sites in the human lens indicates the possible effect of estrogens on lens responses and a protective role against cataract[53].

The use of postmenopausal hormone, acting through the retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) estrogen receptors, has been related to decreased IOP and risk for primary open angle glaucoma. The single use of estrogens resulted in 0.4% per month reduction in primary open angle glaucoma risk, while the combination of estrogen and progesterone exhibited a 0.6% per month reduction[54]. The daily treatment of rats with 17β-estradiol eye drops revealed its neuro protective action. The sequential reduce in the number of apoptotic RGCs prevented the deterioration of vision in these animals[55]. Additionally, Hao et al[56] suggested that 17β-estradiol could be used in the treatment of diabetic retinopathy, due to its properties against oxidative stress. They noted that 17β-estradiol reduced the apoptosis of RGCs, by stabilizing the mitochondrial membrane potential, decreasing intracellular reactive oxygen species(ROS) and cytochrome C concentrations, enhancing B-cell lymphoma 2 (Bcl-2) expression and inhibiting Bax (apoptosis regulator BAX or bcl-2-like protein) expression.

Moreover, non feminizing estrogens have been proposed for the treatment of neurodegenerative eye diseases, such as age-related macular degeneration (AMD)[57]. The antiin flammatory effects of 17β-estradiol against toll-like receptors(TLRs) and IL-6 stimulation have been associated with the impeding of NF-κB DNA-binding activity and AMD[58]. The presence of ERb in mitochondrial network of human RGCs and the unmyelinated portion of their axons in the retinal nerve fibre layer, even in patients with Leber’s hereditary optic neuropathy, explains the antioxidant activity of estrogens. The latter stimulate superoxide dismutase 2 (SOD2), eliminate ROS, and favor DNA replication[59-60]. Estrogens could be used in the treatment of Leber’s hereditary optic neuropathy,preventing oxidative stress and enhancing mitochondrial biogenesis and respiration[59-60].

Furthermore, estrogens have been found to promote VEGF secretion and diminish both malondiadehyde (MDA), an end-product of oxidative stress, and nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) oxidase, which is responsible for the production of free radicals[61]. Both MDA and NADPH are implicated in the early hyperoxic phase of oxygen-induced retinopathy and the late neovascularization.These findings favor the use of estrogens for the treatment of the early phase of oxygen-induced retinopathy[61]. The antioxidant properties of 17β-estradiol against light-induced retinal damage have been associated with the regulation of the enzymes SOD, glutathione peroxidase, and catalase, as well as the antioxidant proteins thioredoxin and nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2[62]. Besides the neuro protective effects of estrogens on the RGCs and retinal fibre layer, they also seem to increase the retinal blood flow, cooperating to the diminution of AMD and glaucoma risk[63].

CONCLUSION

The expression of estrogen and progesterone receptors in the eye is responsible for their ocular effects. The incidence of ocular complications is estimated to be 1 in 230 000, including dry eye symptoms, corneal edema, lens opacities and retinal neuro-ophthalmologic or vascular complications. The severe neuro-ophthalmologic complications involve the 6th cranial nerve paralysis, parietal syndrome, hemianopsia, papillary edema and retrobulbar neuritis. Central retinal artery or vein occlusion, intraocular hemorrhages, aneurysms, macular or papillary edema and acute ischemic optic neuropathy represent the vascular complications of oral contraceptives.On the other hand, estrogens seem to ameliorate the symptoms of keratoconjunctivitis sicca and exhibit protective effect against glaucoma, cataractogenesis and degradation of corneal collagen. Moreover, the antioxidant and neuro protective action of estrogens indicates their possible therapeutic use in neurodegenerative eye diseases, including AMD and diabetic retinopathy. However, physicians should take into consideration patients’ systemic and ocular history, before selecting any method of contraception.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of this paper and they have contributed significantly to this manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest: Moschos M, None; Nitoda E, None.

REFERENCES

1 Sonalkar S, Schreiber CA, Barnhart KT. Contraception. De Groot LJ,Beck-Peccoz P, Chrousos G, Dungan K, Grossman A, Hershman JM,Koch C, McLachlan R, New M, Rebar R, Singer F, Vinik A, Weickert MO. Endocrinology of Female Reproduction South Dartmouth (MA),USA. MDText.com, Inc.;2000-2014 Nov 11.

2 Goldhaber SZ. Risk factors for venous thromboembolism. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;56(1):1-7.

3 Africander D, Verhoog N, Hapgood JP. Molecular mechanisms of steroid receptor-mediated actions by synthetic progestins used in HRT and contraception. Steroids 2011;76(7):636-652.

4 Bouchard P, Chabbert-Buffet N, Fauser BC. Selective progesterone receptor modulators in reproductive medicine: pharmacology, clinical efficacy and safety. Fertil Steril 2011;96(5):1175-1189.

5 Findlay JK, Liew SH, Simpson ER, Korach KS. Estrogen signaling in the regulation of female reproductive functions. Handb Exp Pharmacol 2010;(198):29-35.

6 Sá SI, Pereira PA, Malikov V, Madeira MD. Role of estrogen receptor α and β in the induction of progesterone receptors in hypothalamic ventromedial neurons. Neuroscience 2013;238:159-167.

7 Wiegratz I, Thaler CJ. Hormonal contraception--what kind, when, and for whom? DtschArztebl Int 2011; 108(28-29):495-505; quiz 506.

8 Tchaikovski S, Tans G, Rosing J. Venous thrombosis and oral contraceptives: current status. Womens Health (Lond) 2006;2:761-772.

9 Stocco B, Fumagalli HF, Franceschini SA, Martinez EZ, Marzocchi-Machado CM, de Sá MF, Toloi MR. Comparative study of the effects of combined oral contraceptives in hemostatic variables: an observational preliminary study. Medicine (Baltimore) 2015;94(4):e385.

10 Peragallo Urrutia R, Coeytaux RR, McBroom AJ, Gierisch JM,Havrilesky LJ, Moorman PG, Lowery WJ, Dinan M, Hasselblad V,Sanders GD, Myers ER. Risk of acute thromboembolic events with oral contraceptive use: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 2013;122(2 Pt 1):380-389.

11 Beaber EF, Buist DS, Barlow WE, Malone KE, Reed SD, Li CI.Recent oral contraceptive use by formulation and breast cancer risk among women 20 to 49 years of age. Cancer Res 2014;74(15):4078-4089.

12 Leff SP. Side-effect of oral contraceptives: occlusion of branch artery of the retina. Bull Sinai Hosp Detroit 1976;24(4):227-229.

13 Panisset A. Ocular complications of contraception. Union Med Can 1975;104(10):1549-1550.

14 Wood JR. Ocular complications of oral contraceptives. Ophthalmic Semin 1977;2(4):371-402.

15 Davidson SI. Ocular side-effects through oral contraceptives (author's transl). Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 1973;162(6):800-802.

16 Tomlinson A, Pearce EI, Simmons PA, Blades K. Effect of oral contraceptives on tear physiology. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2001;21(1):9-16.

17 Chen SP, Massaro-Giordano G, Pistilli M, Schreiber CA, Bunya VY.Tear osmolarity and dry eye symptoms in women using oral contraception and contact lenses. Cornea 2013;32(4):423-428.

18 Rahimi Darabad R, Suzuki T, Richards SM, Jakobiec FA, Zakka FR, Barabino S, Sullivan DA. Does estrogen deficiency cause lacrimal gland inflammation and aqueous-deficient dry eye in mice? Exp Eye Res 2014;127:153-160.

19 Mostafa S, Seamon V, Azzarolo AM. Influence of sex hormones and genetic predisposition in Sjögren's syndrome: a new clue to the immunopathogenesis of dry eye disease. Exp Eye Res 2012;96(1):88-97.

20 Sacchetti M, Lambiase A, Moretti C, Mantelli F, Bonini S. Sex hormones in allergic conjunctivitis: altered levels of circulating androgens and estrogens in children and adolescents with vernal keratoconjunctivitis.J Immunol Res 2015;2015:945317.

21 Spoerl E, Zubaty V, Raiskup-Wolf F, Pillunat LE. Oestrogen-induced changes in biomechanics in the cornea as a possible reason for keratectasia. Br J Ophthalmol 2007;91(11):1547-1550.

22 Faust JM, Tyler ET. Ophthalmologic findings in patients using oral contraception. Fertil Steril 1966;17(1):1-6.

23 Abramov Y, Borik S, Yahalom C, Fatum M, Avgil G, Brzezinski A,Banin E. Does postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy affect intraocular pressure? J Glaucoma 2005;14(4):271-275.

24 Drill VA, Rao KS, McConnell RG, Souri EN. Ocular effects of oral contraceptives. I. Studies in the dog. Fertil Steril 1975;26(9):908-913.

25 Garmizo G, Frauens BJ. Corneal copper deposition secondary to oral contraceptives. Optom Vis Sci 2008;85(9):E802-E807.

26 Gong JF, Xie HL, Mao XJ, Zhu XB, Xie ZK, Yang HH, Gao Y, Jin XF,Pan Y, Zhou F. Relevant factors of estrogen changes of myopia in adolescent females. Chin Med J (Engl) 2015;128(5):659-663.

27 Corcelle L. The eye and oral contraceptives. Annee Ther Clin Ophtalmol 1971;22:157-163.

28 Malek N, Lebuisson DA. Adverse ocular reactions to oral contraceptive use. Contracep tFertil Sex (Paris) 1992;20(4):441-444.

29 Leong KC, Tan PL. Central retinal vein thrombosis in a woman on contraceptive pills. Singapore Med J 1974;15(2):156-157.

30 Svarc ED, Werner D. Isolated retinal hemorrhages associated with oral contraceptives. Am J Ophthalmol 1977;84(1):50-55.

31 Jaais F, Habib ZA. Unilateral superior ophthalmic vein thrombosis in a user of oral contraceptives. Med J Malaysia 1994;49(4):416-418.

32 Donoghue JF, McGavigan CJ, Lederman FL, Cann LM, Fu L,Dimitriadis E, Girling JE, Rogers PA. Dilated thin-walled blood and lymphatic vessels in human endometrium: a potential role for VEGF-D in progestin-induced break-through bleeding. PLoS One 2012;7(2):e30916.

33 Li ZH, Fu SJ. Ischemic papillopathy and contraceptives. Chin Med J(Engl) 1988;101(6):446-447.

34 Vastag O, Tornóczky J. Arterial occlusion in the ocular fundus induced by oral contraceptives. Orv Hetil 1984;125(51):3121-3125.

35 Schmidt D, Kramer-Zucker A. Hemicentral retinal artery occlusion due to oral contraceptives. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 2011;228(8):729-733.

36 Gombos GM, Moreno DH, Bedrossian PB. Retinal vascular occlussion induced by oral contraceptives. Ann Ophthalmol 1975;7(2):215-217.

37 Stowe GC 3rd, Zakov ZN, Albert DM. Central retinal vascular occlusion associated with oral contraceptives. Am J Ophthalmol 1978; 86(6):798-801.

38 Bagdade JD, Subbaiah PV. Atherosclerosis and oral contraceptive use.Serum from oral contraceptive users stimulates growth of arterial smooth muscle cells. Arteriosclerosis 1982;2(2):170-176.

39 Valtonen P, Punnonen K, Saarelainen H, Heiskanen N, Raitakari OT,Juonala M, Viikari JS, Alfthan G, Kähönen M, Laaksonen R, Lyyra-Laitinen T, Laitinen T, Heinonen S. ADMA concentration changes across the menstrual cycle and during oral contraceptive use: the Cardiovascular Risk in Young Finns Study. Eur J Endocrinol 2010;162(2):259-265.

40 Cutini PH, Campelo AE, Massheimer VL. Differential regulation of endothelium behavior by progesterone and medroxyprogesterone acetate.J Endocrinol 2014;220(3):179-193.

41 Torgrimson BN, Meendering JR, Kaplan PF, Minson CT. Endothelial function across an oral contraceptive cycle in women using levonorgestrel and ethinyl estradiol. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2007;292(6):H2874-H880.

42 Sorensen MB, Collins P, Ong PJ, Webb CM, Hayward CS, Asbury EA,Gatehouse PD, Elkington AG, Yang GZ, Kubba A, Pennell DJ. Long-term use of contraceptive depot medroxyprogesterone acetate in young women impairs arterial endothelial function assessed by cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Circulation 2002;106(13):1646-1651.

43 de Maat MP, Bladbjerg EM, Kluft C, Winkler UH, Rekers H, Skouby SO, Jespersen J. Estrogen receptor 1 haplotype does not regulate oral contraceptive-induced changes in haemostasis and inflammation risk factors for venous and arterial thrombosis. Hum Reprod 2006;21(6):1473-1476.

44 Drill VA, Martin DP, Golway PL, Hart ER. Ocular effects of oral contraceptives. II. Studies in the rhesus monkey. Fertil Steril 1975;26(9):914-918.

45 Swane Lund FN, Nielsen NV. Retinal damage and oral contraceptives.UgeskrLaeger 1976;138(4):219-221.

46 Glacet-Bernard A, Kuhn D, Soubrane G. Ocular complications of hormonal treatments: oral contraception and menopausal hormonal replacement therapy. Contracept Fertil Sex 1999;27(4):285-290.

47 Davidson SI. Reported adverse effects of oral contraceptives on the eye. Trans Ophthalmol Soc U K 1971;91:561-574.

48 Giovannini A, Consolani A. Contraceptive-induced unilateral retinopathy. Ophthalmologica 1979;179(5):302-305.

49 Wang C, Shi X, Chen X, Wu H, Zhang H, Xie J, Yang X, Gou Z, Ye J.17-β-estradiol inhibits hyperosmolarity-induced proin flammatory cytokine elevation via the p38 MAPK pathway in human corneal epithelial cells.Mol Vis 2012;18:1115-1122.

50 Zhou H, Kimura K, Orita T, Nishida T, Sonoda KH. Inhibition by female sex hormones of collagen degradation by corneal fibroblasts. Mol Vis 2011;17:3415-3422.

51 Gajjar D, Patel D, Alapure B, Praveen MR, Patel A, Johar K Sr,Vasavada AR. Rapid action of oestradiol against hydrogen peroxideinduced oxidative stress in cataractous lens epithelium: an in vitro study.Eye (Lond) 2009;23(6):1456-1463.

52 Aina FO, Smeeth L, Hubbard R, Hurt LS, Fletcher AE. Hormone replacement therapy and cataract: a population-based case-control study.Eye (Lond) 2006;20(4):417-422.

53 Kirker MR, Gallagher KM, Witt-Enderby PA, Davis VL. High af fi nity nuclear and nongenomic estradiol binding sites in the human and mouse lens. Exp Eye Res 2013;112:1-9.

54 Newman-Casey PA, Talwar N, Nan B, Musch DC, Pasquale LR, Stein JD. The potential association between postmenopausal hormone use and primary open-angle glaucoma. JAMA Ophthalmol 2014;132(3):298-303.

55 Prokai-Tatrai K, Xin H, Nguyen V, Szarka S, Blazics B, Prokai L,Koulen P. 17β-estradiol eye drops protect the retinal ganglion cell layer and preserve visual function in an in vivo model of glaucoma. Mol Pharm 2013;10(8):3253-3261.

56 Hao M, Li Y, Lin W, Xu Q, Shao N, Zhang Y, Kuang H. Estrogen prevents high-glucose-induced damage of retinal ganglion cells via mitochondrial pathway. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2015;253(1):83-90.

57 Nixon E, Simpkins JW. neuro protective effects of nonfeminizing estrogens in retinal photoreceptor neurons. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2012;53(8):4739-4747.

58 Paimela T, Ryhänen T, Mannermaa E, Ojala J, Kalesnykas G, Salminen A, Kaarniranta K. The effect of 17beta-estradiol on IL-6 secretion and NF-kappaB DNA-binding activity in human retinal pigment epithelial cells. Immunol Lett 2007;110(2):139-144.

59 Giordano C, Montopoli M, Perli E, Orlandi M, Fantin M, Ross-Cisneros FN, Caparrotta L, Martinuzzi A, Ragazzi E, Ghelli A, Sadun AA,d'Amati G, Carelli V. Oestrogens ameliorate mitochondrial dysfunction in Leber's hereditary optic neuropathy. Brain 2011;134(Pt 1):220-234.

60 Pisano A, Preziuso C, Iommarini L, Perli E, Grazioli P, Campese AF,Maresca A, Montopoli M, Masuelli L, Sadun AA, d'Amati G, Carelli V, Ghelli A, Giordano C. Targeting estrogen receptor β as preventive therapeutic strategy for Leber's Hereditary Optic Neuropathy. Hum Mol Genet 2015;24(24):6921-6931.

61 Zhang H, Wang X, Xu K, Wang Y, Wang Y, Liu X, Zhang X, Wang L,Li X. 17β-estradiol ameliorates oxygen-induced retinopathy in the early hyperoxic phase. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2015;457(4):700-705.

62 Wang S, Wang B, Feng Y, Mo M, Du F, Li H, Yu X. 17β-estradiol ameliorates light-induced retinal damage in Sprague-Dawley rats by reducing oxidative stress. J MolNeurosci 2015;55(1):141-151.

63 Deschênes MC, Descovich D, Moreau M, Granger L, Kuchel GA, Mikkola TS, Fick GH, Chemtob S, Vaucher E, Lesk MR.Postmenopausal hormone therapy increases retinal blood flow and protects the retinal nerve fiber layer. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2010;51(5):2587-2600.