·Clinical Research· Current
Issue IF in JCR CiteScore ·Submission· In Press Recent Accepted PMC RSS
Citation: Geng XY, Wu HQ, Jiang JH, Jiang K, Zhu J, Xu Y,
Dong JC, Yan ZZ. Area and volume ratios for prediction of visual outcome in
idiopathic macular hole. Int J Ophthalmol 2017;10(8):1255-1260
Area and volume ratios for prediction of visual
outcome in idiopathic macular hole
Xing-Yun Geng1,2, Hui-Qun Wu2,
Jie-Hui Jiang1, Kui Jiang2, Jun Zhu3, Yi Xu3,
Jian-Cheng Dong2, Zhuang-Zhi Yan1
1The Institute of Biomedical Engineering, School of Communication
and Information Engineering, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China
2Department of Medical Informatics, Medical School of Nantong
University, Nantong 226001, Jiangsu Province, China
3Department of Ophthalmology, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong
University, Nantong 226001, Jiangsu Province, China
Correspondence
to: Zhuang-Zhi Yan. The Institute of Biomedical Engineering, School
of Communication and Information Engineering, Shanghai University, Shanghai
200444, China. zzyan@shu.edu.cn; Jian-Cheng Dong. Department of Medical
Informatics, Medical School of Nantong University, Nantong 226001, Jiangsu
Province, China. dongjc@ntu.edu.cn
Received:
2016-11-07
Accepted: 2017-04-26
AIM: To
predict the visual outcome in patients undergoing macular hole surgery by two
novel three-dimensional morphological parameters on optical coherence
tomography (OCT): area ratio factor (ARF) and volume ratio factor (VRF).
METHODS: A
clinical case series was conducted, including 54 eyes of 54 patients with an
idiopathic macular hole (IMH). Each patient had an OCT examination before and
after surgery. Morphological parameters of the macular hole, such as minimum
diameter, base diameter, and height were measured. Then, the macular hole index
(MHI), tractional hole index (THI), and hole form factor (HFF) were calculated.
Meanwhile, novel postoperative macular hole (MH) factors, ARF and VRF were
calculated by three-dimensional morphology. Bivariate correlations were performed
to acquire asymptotic significance values between the steady best corrected
visual acuity (BCVA) after surgery and 2D/3D arguments of MH by the Pearson
method with two-tailed test. All significant factors were analyzed by the
receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis of SPSS software which
were responsible for vision recovery. ROC curves analyses were performed to
further discuss the different parameters on the prediction of visual outcome.
RESULTS: The
mean and standard deviation values of patients’ age, symptoms duration, and
follow-up time were 64.8±8.9y (range: 28-81), 18.6±11.5d (range: 2-60), and
11.4±0.4mo (range: 6-24), respectively. Steady-post-BCVA analyzed with
bivariate correlations was found to be significantly correlated with base
diameter (r=0.521, P<0.001), minimum diameter (r=0.514,
P<0.001), MHI (r= -0.531, P<0.001), THI (r=-0.386,
P=0.004), HFF (r=-0.508, P<0.001), and ARF (r=-0.532,
P<0.001). Other characteristic parameters such as age, duration of
surgery, height, diameter hole index, and VRF were not statistically
significant with steady-post-BCVA. According to area under the curve (AUC)
values, values of ARF, MHI, HFF, minimum diameter, THI, and base diameter are
0.806, 0.772, 0.750, 0.705, 0.690, and 0.686, respectively. However,
Steady-post-BCVA analysis with bivariate correlations for VRF was no
statistical significance. Results of ROC curve analysis indicated that the MHI
value, HFF, and ARF was greater than 0.427, 1.027 and 1.558 respectively which
could correlate with better visual acuity.
CONCLUSION: Compared
with MHI and HFF, ARF could effectively express three-dimensional
characteristics of macular hole and achieve better sensitivity and specificity.
Thus, ARF could be the most effective parameter to predict the visual outcome
in macular hole surgery.
KEYWORDS:
optical coherent imaging; prognostic evaluation; idiopathic
macular hole; morphological features
DOI:10.18240/ijo.2017.08.12
Citation: Geng XY, Wu HQ, Jiang JH, Jiang K, Zhu J, Xu Y, Dong JC, Yan ZZ. Area and
volume ratios for prediction of visual outcome in idiopathic macular hole. Int
J Ophthalmol 2017;10(8):1255-1260
Idiopathic
macular hole (IMH) without fundus-related disease occurs in the macular zone of
normal eyes, generally in individuals aged over 50y. The female to male ratio
is approximately 2:1[1]. Affected patients suffer
from severe visual impairment.
Vitreous
surgery within the joint boundary membrance peeling and injection of inert gas is
the main method for clinic treatment of IMH[2].
Extensive research has been explored to study the prognostic factors after
surgery[3-6]. Clinical doctors
using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) can effectively
observe the structural changes in the morphology of IMH in both preoperative
and postoperative patients. A lot of literature has been studied about the
optical coherence tomography (OCT) image of quantitative parameters to predict
IMH postoperative vision in advance, such as macular hole index (MHI),
tractional hole index (THI), and hole form factor (HFF)[7-8].
In
order to show the complete 3D morphology of the macular hole, OCT scanning
equipment manufacturers including Zeiss[9], Topcon[10], and Heidelberg[11]
constantly developed new 3D OCT hardware and software. Accordingly, there was a
lot of related research based on 3D OCT. Scheibe et al[12] reconstructed 3D foveal surface from OCT data to
observe the whole range of asymmetric. Haas et al[13]
analyzed choroidal thickness with 3D-OCT. Brionesr et al[14] reported a spectral OCT system with the internal 3D
microstructure and displacement maps from a poly-methyl-methacrylate sample.
Todorich et al[15] evaluated the impact of
swept-source microscope-integrated optical coherence tomography (MI-OCT) and
tissue-level 3D imaging on ophthalmology residents' performance of ophthalmic
microsurgical maneuvers. Hu et al[16]
developed a 3D graph-based approach to identify the 3D choroidal layer in
SD-OCT images by using the Bruch’s membrane opening prior knowledge
information. Three-dimensional display is steadily becoming the focus of
research and development.
Macular
hole (MH) is a common age-related eye disease[17-18], and IMH is one of the most common types of MH[19]. IMH often causes macular degeneration, swelling, and
rupture in patients. As most human vision comes from the macular center, MH
could cause marked decline in vision. Vitrectomy is a common clinical surgical
method[20] widely used in the treatment of MH.
Post-operative visual acuity of MH surgery is diverse with different
classifications and form of MH morphology. Therefore, designing effective
factors to predict postoperative visual recovery became very important.
To
explore effective factors, several research groups proposed various
morphological characteristics such as MHI, HFF, THI, diameter hole index (DHI),
minimum diameter (MD), and base diameter (BD)[7-8]. However, these parameters only expressed quantitative
information of a certain direction slice and could not effectively express the
direction of different opposites. New clinical parameters are required.
All
proposed MH parameters, which cannot effectively express 3D characteristics of
MH, are measured on a single slice image of OCT. Therefore, novel MH's factors
that contain area ratio factor (ARF) and volume ratio factor (VRF) were
designed and generated by 3D morphology to predict post-operative patients'
vision outcome with IMH.
Patients This was a
retrospective clinical case series of 54 eyes (19 left eyes and 35 right eyes)
from 54 patients (15 male and 39 female). Patients were diagnosed as having
IMHs and proceeded to have vitreous surgery. Cases were collected from January
2013 until March 2015 in Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University Eye Center.
The MH stages in patients’ eyes were II (24 eyes), III (10 eyes), and IV (20
eyes) according to the GASS standard. The lens statuses of pre-operative
patients’ eyes were opacity (9 eyes) and lucency (45 eyes). The lens statuses
of post-operative patients’ eyes were intraocular lens (9 eyes) and original
lens (45 eyes). The mean and standard deviation values of age, symptoms
duration, and follow-up time were 64.8±8.9y (range: 28-81), 18.6±11.5d (range:
2-60), and 11.4±0.4mo (range: 6-24), respectively. The inclusion
criterion was diagnosis of idiopathic full-thickness macular holes on slit-lamp
microscopy and ophthalmoscopy and OCT examination. Patients with other eye
diseases that may affect vision, including high myopia, glaucoma, optic
neuropathy, proliferative vitreous retinopathy, retinal detachment, and fundus
of other diseases were excluded. Patient selection process was approved by the
hospital’s ethics committee and the study followed the tenets of the
Declaration of Helsinki.
Surgical
Methods A three-port
pars plana 23-gauge vitrectomy was performed on all patients by the same
surgeon. The main process includes: 1) making core vitrectomy and triamcinolone
acetonide assisted (10 mg/mL) posterior vitreous detachment; 2) injecting of
indocyanine green (ICG, 5 mg/mL) on the surface of anterior limiting membrane;
3) using the flute needle gettering ICG after about 60s; 4) peeling 3 to 4 disc
diameter centering of inner limiting membrane (ILM) around the macula; 5)
filling with 14% C3F8 into the vitreous cavity. Patients were in the face-down
position after surgery for one week until C3F8 gas was completely absorbed.
Patients with lens opacity had undergone concurrent cataract surgery.
Measure
Parameters All
patients’ OCT images were recorded before, after, and follow-up OCT examination
images. The whole OCT images were acquired by Carl Zeiss CIRRUS HD-OCT 4000.
The machine has scanned macular with 6 mm width, 6 mm height and 2 mm depth.
The horizontal and vertical number of slices is 512 and 128, respectively. Each
slice image size is 300×200 in pixel. In the tissue, the resolution is 5 μm in
axial and 15 μm in lateral.
The
2D parameters are shown in Figure 1. BD, MD, height (H), left arm length (LA),
and right arm length (RA) in Figure 1B were manually measured by the software
measuring tool on the OCT machine. All 2D parameters were measured thrice for
each eye and assigned as the average value by two clinicians. When there was a
disagreement between them, it was verified by a third doctor in order to ensure
the accuracy of measurement. The MHI was defined by Kusuhara et al[8]. The THI and DHI was defined by Ruiz-Moreno et al[1]. The HFF was defined by Ullrich et al[7]. The values were calculated using the following
formulae:
MHI=H/BD F1
THI=MD/BD F2
DHI=H/MD F3
HFF=(LA+RA)/BD F4
Figure
1 The two-dimensional parameters A: A real
OCT image slices; B: The corresponding measurement simplified diagram.
The
reconstructed 3D model of MH was formed of the following steps. 1) The OCT file
was read from the hard disk. 2) The fundus and slice images were obtained. 3)
MH position on fundus image was obtained to confirm the MH region on slices. 4)
Each boundary point of MH was manually drawn by clinicians. 5) The points were
translated to 3D coordinates according to scanning interval of the OCT machine.
6) These 3D points were imported into Meshlab software v1.3.3 (64-bit version)
to reconstruct 3D MH. 7) Particular zone’s area and volume were measured using
the measurement tools. The reconstruction experiment screenshots are shown in
Figure 2.
Figure
2 Reconstruction experiment screenshots A: OCT image; B: Fundus image; C: Slice
images; D: Zone of MH on the fundus image; E: Zone of MH on the slice image; F:
boundary of the MH (red); G: 3D points picture of MH; H: Reconstruction of 3D
structure of MH.
Considering
that MH is a 3D structure, two novel 3D factors for the 3D structure of MH were
defined by our research group: ARF and VRF. Inferior volume contains the region
between the minimum and bottom base. The related parameters are shown in the
Figure 3.
Figure
3 The three-dimensional parameters A: A real MH
3D reconstruction image; B: Measuring the corresponding area and volume.
ARF=Body
surface area/bottom base area F5
VRF=Inferior
volume/all volume F6
Statistical
Analysis Parameters
including pre-best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), post-operational follow-up
BCVA, BD, MD, H, MHI, THI, HFF, ARF, and VRF were analyzed. Steady-post-BCVA
stands for patients’ vision unchanged at least 6mo in last two visits after
surgery. Pre-BCVA and steady-post-BCVA were recorded in decimal visual acuity
and converted to logMAR equivalent for statistical analyses[21].
First,
pre-BCVA was analyzed for its correlation with steady post-operational
follow-up BCVA (steady-post-BCVA) by nonparametric tests through Wilcoxon-rank
sum methods. Then, bivariate correlations were performed to acquire asymptotic
significance values between the steady BCVA after surgery and 2D/3D arguments
of MH by the Pearson method with two-tailed test. Finally, receiver operating
characteristic (ROC) curves were used to quantify the performance of MD, BD,
MHI, THI, and ARF for better visual outcome after surgery, by means of
sensitivity, specificity, area under the curve (AUC), and corresponding 95%
confidence intervals (CIs). Only AUC>0.5 indicates effective diagnostic
value. If 0.5<AUC≤0.7, it indicates low accuracy. If 0.7<AUC≤0.9, it
indicates moderate accuracy. If AUC>0.9, it indicates higher accuracy. If
AUC=0.5, it indicates that the diagnostic method does not work completely and
thereby has no diagnostic value.
We
investigated the optimum cut-off value for diagnosis by maximizing the sum of
sensitivity and specificity and minimizing the distance of the cut-off value to
the top-left corner of the ROC curve. P<0.05 (two-sided test) was
considered significant. All statistical analyses were performed with SPSS 18.0
software (SPSS, IBM Software Company).
The
mean and standard deviation values of MD, BD, height, logMAR pre-BCVA and
logMAR steady-post-BCVA were 446.5±168.3 μm (range: 99-857), 888.6±300.4 μm
(range: 212-1516), 666.9±138.7 μm (range: 281-1031), 0.80±0.23 (range: 0.4-1.0)
and 0.41±0.24 (range: 0.1-1.0), respectively. The whole BCVA of 54 cases was
effectively elected after surgery. To evaluate surgery results by BCVA, we
defined three BCVA statuses: if the patient’s pro-BCVA improved more than two
lines in visual acuity chart, it means improvement of BCVA; if the patient’s
pro-BCVA fluctuates in one lines in visual acuity chart, it means unchanged of
BCVA; if the patient’s pro-BCVA declined more than two lines in visual acuity
chart, it means worsened of BCVA. The results showed that BCVA of 40 (74.1%)
eyes showed improvement, 11 (20.4%) remained unchanged, 3 (5.5%) worsened.
Steady-post-BCVA had asymptotic significations with pre-BCVA in Wilcoxon signed
rank test (P<0.01).
Bivariate
correlations were analyzed between logMAR steady-post-BCVA and all MH
parameters by the Pearson method. Table 1 shows the r and P values.
The characteristic parameters such as age (r=0.175, P=0.205),
duration (r= -0.152, P=0.272), height (r=-0.069, P=0.619),
DHI (r=0.058, P=0.680), and VRF (r=0.072, P=0.605)
were not statistically significant. Others including BD (r=0.521, P<0.001),
MD (r=0.514, P<0.001), MHI (r=-0.531, P<0.001),
THI (r=-0.386, P=0.004), HFF (r=-0.508, P<0.001),
and ARF (r=-0.532, P<0.001) were statistically significant.
Table
1 The r and P value of bivariate correlations
analyzed between steady-post-BCVA and all MH parameters
Parameters |
r |
P |
Age |
0.175 |
0.205 |
Duration
time |
-0.152 |
0.272 |
Height |
-0.069 |
0.619 |
DHI |
0.058 |
0.680 |
VRF |
0.072 |
0.605 |
BD |
0.521 |
<0.001 |
MD |
0.514 |
<0.001 |
MHI |
-0.531 |
<0.001 |
THI |
-0.386 |
0.004 |
HFF |
-0.508 |
<0.001 |
ARF |
-0.532 |
<0.001 |
ROC
curves analyses were performed to further discuss the different parameters on
the prediction of visual outcome. Positive correlation parameters are presented
in Figure 4A. Other negative correlation parameters are displayed in Figure 4B.
Figure
4 ROC curves A: Positive
correlation parameters; B: Negative correlation parameters.
Table
2 details the AUC, cut-off value, and associated sensitivity and specificity
with MD, BD, MHI, THI, HFF, and ARF. According to AUC values, values of ARF,
MHI, HFF, MD, THI, and BD are 0.806, 0.772, 0.750, 0.705, 0.690, and 0.686
respectively. The associated cut-off value, sensitivity, and specificity,
respectively, are as follows: ARF (1.558, 0.769, and 0.786); MHI (0.427, 0.885,
and 0.607); HFF (1.027, 0.731, and 0.714); MD (416, 0.679, and 0.654); THI
(1.710, 0.577, and 0.821); and BD (868, 0.714, and 0.647).
Table
2 AUC, cut-off value, associated sensitivity and specificity with min diameter,
BD, MHI, THI, HFF and ARF
Parameters |
AUC |
P |
Cut-off
point |
||
Value |
Sensitivity |
Specificity |
|||
MD |
0.705 |
0.010 |
416 |
0.679 |
0.654 |
BD |
0.686 |
0.019 |
868 |
0.714 |
0.647 |
MHI |
0.772 |
0.001 |
0.427 |
0.885 |
0.607 |
THI |
0.690 |
0.017 |
1.710 |
0.577 |
0.821 |
HFF |
0.750 |
0.002 |
1.027 |
0.731 |
0.714 |
ARF |
0.806 |
<0.001 |
1.558 |
0.769 |
0.786 |
This
paper proposed the parameter ARF, which could effectively predict postoperative
visual acuity. High ARF value represents that MH peripheral tissues might be
effective to fill the macular concave center area, which indicates better
visual recover y after surgery. Similar to MHI, HFF, MD, THI, and BD
steady-post-BCVA analyzed with bivariate correlations for ARF was found
statistically significant. Furthermore, ROC curves analysis for above six
parameters was performed to further discuss the different parameters on the
prediction of steady-post-BCVA. ROC curve analysis found that the proposed ARF
had best prediction power.
This
study has the following limitations. First, although the number of samples
might be more than that reported in some studies, the overall sample size is
relatively small. Second, we utilized the clinical case series of Affiliated
Hospital of Nantong University Eye Center. Third, manual segmentation, single
slice, and the specific model of the OCT machine, might have resulted in
discrepant findings across studies that used the same method. As we used the
Meshlab to generate the 3D MH and measure specific regions and parameters with
built-in functions of the software, this process may have introduced some
deviation. Due to the limitations of our sample, we didn’t find a correlation
between the steady-post-BCVA and the duration of symptoms in this study. While,
it is a clinical experience and result of various studies[22-25] that a longer duration of 6 or 12mo negative
influences the vision rehabilitation after surgery.
In
future studies, we plan to gather more data samples and design effective
automated segmentation, 3D reconstruction, and measurement algorithms, wherein
automatic algorithms are used instead of manual operations to reduce the
deviation and improve the accuracy of the experiment. There are few public OCT
images network dataset, which contain very small number of samples or very low
image resolution. The OCT database of MH samples, including GETOCT[26], retinal OCT imaging[27]
and New York Eye Ear Infirmary of Mount Sinai (NYEE), were found on the
internet. While GETOCT only released several medical records, retinal OCT
imaging did not focus on our research theme, and NYEE images were of very low
image resolution and thereby unclear. Therefore, we utilized the clinical case
series of Nantong University Affiliated Hospital Eye Center.
In
conclusion, based solely on the MH’s unique 3D morphological characteristics,
this study has designed, built, and verified the 3D index type ARF for
postoperative analysis of the MH. Medical statistical analysis results indicate
that the ARF, compared with traditional 2D index, provide more effective
sensitivity and specificity.
Foundations: Supported
by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.61675124; No.81501559);
Natural Science Foundation of the Higher Education Institutions of Jiangsu
Province, China (No.15KJB310015); Science and Technology Foundation of Nantong
Technology Bureau (No. MS12015180).
Conflicts
of Interest: Geng XY, None; Wu HQ, None; Jiang JH, None; Jiang
K, None; Zhu J, None; Xu Y, None; Dong JC, None; Yan
ZZ, None.
1 Ruiz-Moreno JM, Staicu C, Piñero DP, Montero J, Lugo
F, Amat P. Optical coherence tomography predictive factors for macular hole
surgery outcome. Br J Ophthalmol
2008;92(5):640-644. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
2 Puliafito CA, Hee MR, Lin CP, Reichel E, Schuman JS,
Duker JS, Izatt JA, Swanson EA, Fujimoto JG. Imaging of macular diseases with
optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology
1995;102(2):217-229. [CrossRef]
3 Nukada K, Hangai M, Ooto S, Yoshikawa M, Yoshimura N.
Tomographic features of macula after successful macular hole surgery. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci
2013;54(4):2417-2428. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
4 Kusuhara S, Negi A. Predicting visual outcome
following surgery for idiopathic macular holes. Ophthalmologica 2014;231(3):125-132. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
5 Chen H, Chen W, Zheng K, Peng K, Xia H, Zhu L.
Prediction of spontaneous closure of traumatic macular hole with spectral
domain optical coherence tomography. Sci
Rep 2015;5:12343. [CrossRef] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
6 Matsumiya W, Kusuhara S, Shimoyama T, Honda S,
Tsukahara Y, Negi A. Predictive value of preoperative optical coherence
tomography for visual outcome following macular hole surgery: effects of
imaging alignment. Jpn J Ophthalmol
2013;57(3):308-315. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
7 Ullrich S, Haritoglou C, Gass C, Schaumberger M,
Ulbig MW, Kampik A. Macular hole size as a prognostic factor in macular hole
surgery. Br J Ophthalmol 2002;86(4):390-393.
[CrossRef]
8 Kusuhara S, Teraoka Escaño MF, Fujii S, Nakanishi Y,
Tamura Y, Nagai A, Yamamoto H, Tsukahara Y, Negi A. Prediction of postoperative
visual outcome based on hole configuration by optical coherence tomography in
eyes with idiopathic macular holes. Am J
Ophthalmol 2004;138(5):709-716. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
12 Scheibe P, Lazareva A, Braumann UD, Reichenbach A,
Wiedemann P, Francke M, Rauscher FG. Parametric model for the 3D reconstruction
of individual fovea shape from OCT data. Exp
Eye Res 2014;119(1):19-26. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
13 Haas P, Esmaeelpour M, Ansari-Shahrezaei S, Drexler
W, Binder S. Choroidal thickness in patients with reticular pseudodrusen using
3D 1060-nm OCT maps. Invest Ophthalmol
Vis Sci 2014;55(4):2674-2681. [CrossRef] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
15 Todorich B, Shieh C, DeSouza PJ, Carrasco-Zevallos
OM, Cunefare DL, Stinnett SS, Izatt JA, Farsiu S, Mruthyunjaya P, Kuo AN, Toth
CA. Impact of microscope-integrated OCT on ophthalmology resident performance
of anterior segment surgical maneuvers in model eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2016;57(9):OCT146-153. [CrossRef] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
17 Steel DH, Parkes C, Papastavrou VT, Avery PJ,
EI-Ghrably IA, Habib MS, Sandinha MT, Smith J, Stannard KP, Vaideanu-Collins D,
Hillier RJ. Predicting macular hole closure with ocriplasmin based on spectral
domain optical coherence tomography. Eye
(Lond) 2016;30(5):740-745. [CrossRef] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
18 Grewal DS, Fine HF, Mahmoud TH. Management of
challenging macular holes: current concepts and new surgical techniques. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina 2016;47(6):508-513. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
19 Shpak AA, Shkvorchenko DO, Sharafetdinov IKh,
Yukhanova OA. Predicting anatomical results of surgical treatment of idiopathic
macular hole. Int J Ophthalmol 2016;9(2):253-257.
[PMC free article] [PubMed]
20 Parravano M, Giansanti F, Eandi CM, Yap YC, Rizzo S,
Virgili G. Vitrectomy for idiopathic macular hole. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015;5:CD009080. [CrossRef]
21 Holladay JT. Proper method for calculating average
visual acuity. J Refract Surg 1997;13(4):388-391.
[PubMed]
22 Mitchell P, Korobelnik JF, Lanzetta P, Holz FG,
Prünte C, Schmidt-Erfurth U, Tano Y, Wolf S. Ranibizumab (Lucentis) in
neovascular age-related macular degeneration: evidence from clinical trials. Br J Ophthalmol 2010;94(1):2-13. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
23 Keane PA, Patel PJ, Liakopoulos S, Heussen FM, Sadda
SR, Tufail A. Evaluation of age-related macular degeneration with optical
coherence tomography. Surv Ophthalmol 2012;57(5):389-414. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
24 Inoue M, Arakawa A, Yamane S, Watanabe Y, Kadonosono
K. Long-term outcome of macular microstructure assessed by optical coherence
tomography in eyes with spontaneous resolution of macular hole. Am J Ophthalmol 2012;153(4):687-691. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
25 Sharma D, Venkatesh R, Mayor R, Agarwal M.
Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography study of macular structure as
prognostic and determining factor for macular hole surgery outcome. Retina 2014;34(3):e5. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
27 Retinal OCT imaging.
http://www.opsweb.org/?page=RetinalOCT (Accessed on Oct 26, 2016).