bannter.jpg

Citation: Lin ZL, Lin DR, Chen JJ, Li J, Li XY, Wang LS, Liu ZZ, Cao QZ, Chen C, Zhu Y, Chen WR, Liu YZ, Lin HT. Increased prevalence of parent ratings of ADHD symptoms among children with bilateral congenital cataracts. Int J Ophthalmol 2019;12(8):1323-1329. DOI:10.18240/ijo.2019.08.14

 
·
Investigation·

Increased prevalence of parent ratings of ADHD symptoms among children with bilateral congenital cataracts

Zhuo-Ling Lin1, Duo-Ru Lin1, Jing-Jing Chen1, Jing Li1, Xiao-Yan Li1, Li-Sha Wang1, Zhen-Zhen Liu1, Qian-Zhong Cao1, Chuan Chen1,2, Yi Zhu1,2, Wei-Rong Chen1, Yi-Zhi Liu1, Hao-Tian Lin1

1State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong Province, China

2Department of Molecular and Cellular Pharmacology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida 33136, USA

Co-first authors: Zhuo-Ling Lin and Duo-Ru Lin

Correspondence to: Hao-Tian Lin. State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Xianlie South Road #54, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong Province, China. gddlht@aliyun.com

Received: 2018-10-05        Accepted: 2019-02-14

Abstract

AIM: To investigate the behavioral and psychological disorders and the prevalence of parent ratings of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptoms among children with bilateral congenital cataracts (CCs).

METHODS: This cross-sectional study investigated children with bilateral CC aged 3-8y (CC group) using Conners’ Parent Rating Scale-48 (CPRS-48) from July to December 2016. The abnormal rates of psychological symptoms in CC children and normal vision (NV) children were compared using the Chi-square test. The scores of CC children were compared with those of NV children and the Chinese urban norm using the independent samples t-test and one-sample t-test, respectively.

RESULTS: A total of 262 valid questionnaires were collected. The ratio of CC children to NV children was 119:143. The overall rate of psychological symptoms in CC children was 2.28 times higher than that in NV children (46.22% vs 20.28%, Pearson’s χ2=20.062; P<0.001). CC children showed higher scores for conduct problems, learning problems, impulsiveness/hyperactivity, anxiety, and hyperactivity index than NV children and the Chinese urban norm, particularly between the ages of 3 and 5y. Furthermore, male children aged between 6 and 8y showed a higher impulsive/hyperactive score than females of the same age (t=6.083, P<0.001).

CONCLUSION: Children with bilateral CCs have a higher rate of ADHD symptoms than children with NV. This study provides clinical evidence that screening for psychological symptoms and particularly for ADHD symptoms in children with bilateral CC are recommended for an early diagnosis and timely treatment.

KEYWORDS: attention deficit hyperactivity disorder; congenital cataract; Conners’ Parent Rating Scale-48

DOI:10.18240/ijo.2019.08.14

Citation: Lin ZL, Lin DR, Chen JJ, Li J, Li XY, Wang LS, Liu ZZ, Cao QZ, Chen C, Zhu Y, Chen WR, Liu YZ, Lin HT. Increased prevalence of parent ratings of ADHD symptoms among children with bilateral congenital cataracts. Int J Ophthalmol 2019;12(8):1323-1329

INTRODUCTION

Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is one of the most common neurobehavioral disorders of childhood[1]. Factors such as genetics[2], neurophysiology[3], perinatal conditions[4], and the environment[5] have been linked to ADHD. Furthermore, visual skills, such as stereopsis and formed perception, are also reported strongly correlated with mental development[6]. However, it is unclear that whether the visual disorder increases the rate of psychological symptoms. Recently, we found that patients with age-related cataracts presented decreased brain functions and altered grey matter volumes in visual and cognitive-related areas[7], indicating a close relationship of damages between vision and mental health. A national study of 75 171 children in the United States also showed that the prevalence of ADHD in children with visual impairments was 1.9 times higher than in those with normal vision (NV)[1].

Congenital cataracts (CCs) is a typical visual disorder and the leading cause of childhood blindness, which occurs before or during the critical behavioral and psychological developmental stages[8]. The complications of astigmatic refractive error and convergence insufficiency among CC children[9-10] are commonly associated with neurodevelopmental disorders[11-14]. These findings are consistent with the observations in our clinical practice of treating more than 6000 CC children at the Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center (ZOC). Our group observed that CC patients were more anxious or hyperactive during ocular examinations compared with healthy children. However, the rate of psychological symptoms and the risk of ADHD in children with bilateral CC remains unclear due to unexplored. Therefore, in this study, we conducted a cross-sectional, face-to-face investigation to evaluate the behavioral and psychological symptoms among bilateral CC children using the Conners’ Parent Rating Scale (CPRS) questionnaire, an assessment tool for screening ADHD that obtains parental reports of childhood behavioral problems in research and clinical settings[15-17]. The findings of this study would help ophthalmologists understand the psychological symptoms of CC children to provide better medical care for both physical and psychological health.  


SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Ethical Approval  This study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT 03692728) and approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee at the ZOC. Written informed consent was obtained from the legal guardian of each participant. All procedures performed in this study were consistent with the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki and were approved by the Ethical Review Committee of the ZOC at Sun Yat-sen University (ERC-ZOC-SYSU).

Participants  This cross-sectional study included bilateral CC children and children with NV aged 3-8y who presented to the ZOC between July and December 2016. All included CC patients were registered members of the Childhood Cataract Program of the Chinese Ministry of Health (CCPMOH), a national platform focused on childhood cataract research[10]. The diagnosis of CC was independently confirmed by two experienced pediatric ophthalmologists (Lin HT and Chen WR) based on a comprehensive evaluation of the onset age (within one year after birth), morphological features of lens opacity, family history, and detailed medical records.

Patients complicated with systemic manifestations, such as Lowe syndrome, Marfan syndrome, and Down syndrome, were excluded. Patients with a self-reported family history of ADHD or brain and neuronal deficits were also excluded. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in the better eye, complicated strabismus and nystagmus, surgical age, and surgical procedure were reviewed. Postoperative refractive error correction and postoperative complications, including ocular hypertension (OH, > 21 mm Hg) and yttrium aluminum garnet (YAG) laser treatments for visual axial opacity (VAO), were also reviewed. A convenience sample of age-matched NV children was recruited from the Optometry Department of the ZOC as the control group. NV was defined as BCVA ≥0.3 (logMAR) in children between 3-5 years old or BCVA ≥0.15 (logMAR) in children older than 5y[18]. Children with strabismus and high refractive error (myopia or hyperopia: >6.0 diopters; astigmatism: >3.0 diopters) were excluded from the NV group. Subjects were further divided into the following two subgroups to compare the behavioral and psychological problems of the CC children at different neurodevelopmental stages: 3- to 5-year-old (3y≤patients≤5y) and 6- to 8-year-old age groups (5y<patients≤8y)[19]. The BCVA of the better eye of the bilateral CC patients was analyzed. The BCVAs of the better eye of the bilateral CC children were compared to those of the right eye of the NV children and the Chinese urban norm.

CPRS Questionnaire and Survey Method  Due to the close contact between children and parents, this study investigated the risks of ADHD of both CC patients and NV children using the CPRS-48 questionnaire (CPRS-48, Chinese revision of 1978)[20]. The CPRS-48 contains 5 evaluating subscales, including the conduct problems, learning problems, psychosomatic, impulsiveness/hyperactivity, and anxiety subscales. A total of 48 items are included in the questionnaire, and each item is scored from 0 to 3. The final scores of the 5 subscales are defined as the mean scores of the corresponding items: conduct problems (2+8+14+19+20+21+22+23+27+33+34+39)/12; learning problems (10+25+31+37)/4; psychosomatic (32+41+43+44+48)/5; impulsiveness/hyperactivity (4+5+11+13)/4; anxiety (12+16+24+47)/4; and the hyperactivity index (4+7+11+13+14+25+31+33+37+38)/10. Because childhood behaviors may be influenced by regional customs, cultural backgrounds, and economic conditions, the norm of the CPRS-48 may vary in different countries[21-22]. Therefore, the scores of the CC children were also compared to those of the Chinese urban norm. The Chinese urban norm, with a homogeneity reliability of 0.932 and a split-half reliability of 0.900, was established based on the findings obtained from 3576 Chinese children aged 3-18y from 14 representative cities[23]. Any item with a score two standard deviations away from the mean of the Chinese urban norm (mean+2SD) indicates a psychological symptom, and the overall abnormal rate (the proportion of children with psychological symptoms) on the CPRS-48 was calculated as an indicator of childhood psychological disorders.

All questionnaire investigations were performed by the same researcher (Lin ZL). Questionnaires were completed by parents or guardians who lived with the patients and thoroughly knew their behavioral and psychological conditions. The questionnaires that met the following conditions were considered invalid and excluded from further analysis: 1) More than one-third of the items were left blank; 2) All items were given the same scores or were marked with obvious regularity.

Statistical Analysis  All measurements were analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS ver. 19.0; SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The normal distributions of the CPRS-48 subscale scores were tested using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Differences in age and sex between the CC and NV groups were compared using the independent samples t-test and Chi-square test, respectively. Comparisons of abnormal rates between the CC and NV groups were performed using the Chi-square test. Scores on all subscales recorded for the CC group were compared with those of the NV group and the Chinese urban norm using the independent samples t-test and one-sample t-test, respectively. The level of significance was P<0.05.


RESULTS

Participant Recruitment and Demographics  A total of 291 questionnaires were issued, of which 262 were valid and included in this study. The remaining 29 questionnaires were excluded for the following reasons: 4 for limited Chinese proficiency, 3 for Marfan syndrome, 3 for blank responses, and 19 for invalid questionnaires (Figure 1). The mean age of all included children was 5.33±1.65y, and the ratio of CC patients to NV children was 119:143. Basic information and the visual acuity of the two groups are shown in Table 1. No significant differences in age and sex were found between the groups. The NV group exhibited better BCVA compared to the CC group (logMAR 0.10±0.16 vs 0.59±0.53, t=10.642, P<0.001).

Zhuo-Ling Lin

Figure 1 Flowchart of the selection and grouping of the children  CC: Congenital cataract; ZOC: Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center; NV: Normal vision.

Table 1 Comparisons of basic information and visual acuity between the CC patients and NV children

Parameters

CC group

NV group

t

P

n (%)

119 (45.42)

143 (45.54)

-

-

Male:Female

72:47

75:68

0.428

0.513a

Age (3-5y)

3.92±0.84

4.05±0.82

-0.870

0.386

Age (6-8y)

6.81±0.76

6.96±0.89

-1.061

0.291

BCVA (3-5y, logMAR)

0.77±0.40

0.15±0.10

11.777

<0.001b

BCVA (6-8y, logMAR)

0.42±0.39

0.07±0.18

6.417

<0.001b

CC: Congenital cataract; NV: Normal vision; BCVA: Best corrected visual acuity; aPearson’s Chi-square test; bStatistically significant as determined by the independent samples t-test (P<0.05).

The prevalence of strabismus (esotropia or exotropia) and nystagmus in all CC patients was 62.18% (74/119) and 56.30% (67/119), respectively. A total of 104 children (87.39%) underwent cataract surgery. Among these patients, 50% (52/104) children underwent cataract extraction (CE) and intraocular lens (IOL) implantation in one surgery, 40.38% (42/104) underwent CE and IOL implantation in two separate surgeries, and the remaining 9.62% (10/104) were left aphakic. The mean age of the postoperative patients at the primary surgery was 31.09±25.53mo, and the mean age at the secondary IOL implantation was 51.51±17.00mo. All refractive errors of the postoperative patients were corrected by frame glasses. The rates of postoperative OH and laser-treated VAO were 15.13% (18/119) and 15.97% (19/119), respectively.

Comparison of the Overall Rates of Psychological Symptoms  The overall rate of psychological symptoms in the CC patients was 2.28 times higher than that of the NV children (46.22% vs 20.28%, Pearson’s χ2=20.062, P<0.001). The rates of psychological symptoms in the CC patients and NV children were further compared in a subgroup analysis based on age and sex (Table 2). Between the ages of 3 and 5, female CC patients showed significantly higher rates of psychological symptoms than female NV children (50% vs 12.9%, Pearson’s χ2=9.025, P=0.006), while between the ages of 6 and 8, male CC patients showed significantly higher rates of psychological symptoms than male NV children (65.71% vs 31.82%, Pearson’s χ2=8.995, P=0.003).

Table 2 Comparisons of the overall rates of psychological symptoms between the CC patients and NV children

Age

Sex

CC group (%)

NV group (%)

χ2

P

3-5y

M

29.73 (11/37)

16.13 (5/31)

1.734

0.254

 

F

50 (12/24)

12.90 (4/31)

9.025

0.006a

6-8y

M

65.71 (23/35)

31.82 (14/44)

8.995

0.003a

 

F

39.13 (9/23)

16.22 (6/37)

3.972

0.067

Overall

46.22 (55/119)

20.28 (29/143)

20.062

< 0.001a

CC: Congenital cataract; NV: Normal vision. aStatistically significant as determined by Pearson’s Chi-square test (P<0.05).

Comparisons of the CPRS-48 Subscale Scores  The CPRS-48 subscale scores of the CC children were compared with those of the NV group and the Chinese urban norm (Table 3). In bilateral CC children aged 3-5 years old, the subscale scores for conduct problems, learning problems, impulsiveness/hyperactivity, anxiety, and the hyperactivity index were significantly higher than those of the NV group and the Chinese urban norm. In bilateral CC children aged 6-8 years old, the subscale scores for impulsiveness/hyperactivity in both sexes and hyperactivity index in females were significantly higher than those of the NV group and the Chinese urban norm; the subscale scores for conduct problems, learning problems, and anxiety were significantly higher than the Chinese urban norm. We also found that bilateral CC boys aged 6-8 years old showed higher scores on the impulsiveness/hyperactivity subscale than girls of the same age (t=6.083, P<0.001).

Table 3 Comparisons of the CPRS-48 subscale scores among CC patients, NV children, and the Chinese urban norm

Age

Sex

Group

n

Conduct problems

Learning problems

Psychosomatic

Impulsiveness/hyperactivity

Anxiety

Hyperactivity index

3-5y

M

CC

37

0.79± 0.34a,b

1.05± 0.53a,b

0.18±0.25

1.20± 0.64a,b

0.61± 0.40a,b

1.08± 0.37a,b

   

NV

31

0.44±0.45

0.46±0.47

0.10±0.19

0.63±0.74

0.27±0.31

0.53±0.54

   

Norm

194

0.48±0.36

0.64±0.53

0.15±0.24

0.58±0.56

0.43±0.37

0.55±0.43

 

F

CC

24

0.67± 0.39a,b

0.85± 0.53a,b

0.15±0.22

1.10± 0.67a,b

0.56±0.33b

0.87± 0.50a,b

   

NV

31

0.36±0.40

0.44±0.51

0.14±0.24

0.46±0.54

0.40±0.43

0.42±0.47

   

Norm

157

0.39±0.27

0.49±0.42

0.11±0.20

0.47±0.44

0.40±0.35

0.45±0.35

6-8y

M

CC

35

0.66±0.36b

1.11±0.59b

0.19±0.36

1.98± 0.79a,b

0.51±0.50b

0.88±0.49

   

NV

44

0.59±0.33

0.93±0.51

0.19±0.33

0.77±0.53

0.44±0.31

0.74±0.38

   

Norm

407

0.41±0.32

0.61±0.49

0.17±0.26

0.58±0.47

0.34±0.38

0.78±0.56

 

F

CC

23

0.58±0.33b

0.96±0.49b

0.15±0.16

0.84± 0.52a,b

0.45±0.40b

0.74± 0.41a,b

   

NV

37

0.46±0.22

0.72±0.43

0.15±0.27

0.59±0.39

0.46±0.41

0.54±0.31

   

Norm

383

0.34±0.29

0.51±0.46

0.15±0.23

0.41±0.45

0.32±0.32

0.40±0.34

CC: Congenital cataract group; NV: Normal vision group; Norm: The Chinese urban norm. aP<0.05, significantly different from the NV group, as determined by an independent samples t-test; bP<0.05, significantly different from the Chinese urban norm, as determined by a one-sample t-test.

DISCUSSION

Behavioral and psychological problems in children with visual problems can be easily ignored by ophthalmologists. Decreased visual acuity is often readily corrected by surgeries or wearing glasses, while the impairments in mental health associated with visual dysfunction can have a profound effect on the patient’s quality of life (QoL)[24]. Recent studies have paid increasing attention to the association between childhood visual problems and psychological disorders, especially ADHD. Kutzbach et al[25] found an increased prevalence of self-reported ADHD among patients with albinism-related vision impairment. Additionally, DeCarlo et al[1] reported a higher prevalence of ADHD among children with visual impairments that were not correctable with glasses or contact lenses than that of children with NV (15.6% vs 8.3%, respectively). However, few studies have investigated the ADHD symptoms and related psychological problems among children with CC, a typical visual impairment that cannot be completely corrected by optical correction. In our study, all CC children were in refractive error states with convergence insufficiency after surgery (90.38% pseudophakia and 9.62% aphakia), and over half of the CC children presented with the complications of strabismus (62.18%) or nystagmus (56.30%). All these ocular complications contribute to the development of childhood behavioral and psychological disorders[1,11-14]. Reimelt et al[11] found that both the refractive error and strabismus were independently associated with ADHD in the single logistic regression models. Furthermore, the average age at primary surgery among the CC children in this study was 31.09mo, which represented a delay of nearly 2y compared to the age reported in developed countries[26].  A long period of binocular form deprivation in very young children may lead to developmental visual disorder and difficulties in acquiring information. Since visual inputs provide the predominant sensory input to the brain, vision problems can profoundly impact attention. Children may not be able to keep their attention focused if they are unable to see clearly[1]. Additionally, CC patients require more executive functioning (the advanced cognitive processes that enable people to organize, plan, pay attention, and manage time and space) to compensate for their visual deficit, leaving less executive function in reserve for the maintenance of an attentional state[1,27].

The mental health of children with CC was evaluated using the QoL questionnaire used in previous studies. For example, Ye et al[28] found that bilateral CC children had lower scores for both psychology and communication factors compared to NV children. The British Congenital Cataract Interest Group (BCCIG) showed that in CC children, the mean psychosocial health score was lower than the physical health score (72.93 vs 80.76)[29]. Additionally, Tailor et al[30] reported that CC children had lower psychosocial Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) subscores than physical subscores. Furthermore, several studies reported that CC children had low QoL scores comparable to those of children with severe congenital cardiac defects or childhood cancers[31-32]. However, the QoL questionnaires include only one or two psychology-related factors and cannot be used to comprehensively assess all aspects of the mental health status of CC patients. Notably, the CPRS questionnaire used in this study uses a special rating scale to fully analyze children and adolescents’ developmental behavior and mental health by including five behavioral and psychological factors[33]. We showed that compared to NV children and the Chinese urban norm, CC children exhibited higher scores on the conduct problem, learning problem, impulsiveness/hyperactivity, anxiety, and hyperactivity index subscales, indicating the psychological symptoms and a higher risk of developing ADHD.

Notably, compared to NV children, CC patients typically had significantly higher scores on CPRS-48 subscales when they were 3-5 years old. The mean ages at both the primary surgical intervention and secondary IOL implantation of the CC patients were within the first 5 years of life (30.09 and 51.51mo, respectively). Intensive surgical procedures, frequent hospital visits, and eye drop treatments during this period may induce anxiety in bilateral CC children and their families[30]. Moreover, boys are more likely to display impulsive behaviors[34-35]. Abikoff et al[36] demonstrated that boys with ADHD may engage in more rule-breaking and externalizing behaviors than girls. Consistent with these findings, our study showed that school-aged boys with CC (6 to 8 years old) tended to be more impulsive and hyperactive than girls. More attention should be paid to the sex difference in ADHD among bilateral CC patients to better guide diagnosis and treatment. 

Unilateral CC patients usually have normal visual acuity in the healthy eye, and their acquisition of visual information is not severely affected. Furthermore, additional management of occlusion or blurring of the unaffected eye in unilateral CC patients may affect motor coordination and emotions[37-38]. Therefore, we included only bilateral CC children in this study to avoid these potential confounding factors. Furthermore, we used the face-to-face interview method to ensure that the parents completely understood each item of the CPRS-48.

The close relationship between CC and ADHD can be supported by the possible common genetic and developmental neurobiological basis. CC is one of the clinical manifestations of the mutations of the paired box homeotic gene-6 (PAX6)[39], which has rich interactions with homeobox protein MEIS-2. The MEIS-2 gene has been nominally associated with the severity of hyperactive-impulsive symptoms in a family-based study of ADHD[40]. Furthermore, a novel syndrome of CC, ADHD, and cognitive impairment linkage to chromosomes 11 disorder have also been revealed in a consanguineous family[41]. However, the analysis of genetic and neurobiological basis between CC and ADHD were not performed in the current study and should be further investigated.

This study also has other limitations. First, parental stress regarding treatment and outcomes for their children was not evaluated. Parental stress and childhood behavior disorders have a bidirectional relationship[42], and we will investigate the effect of parental stress on the development of psychological symptoms in their CC children in our follow-up studies. Second, we used questionnaire investigations in the pediatric ophthalmology clinics to evaluate the risk of ADHD development. Although the CPRS-48 has been widely used to evaluate childhood neurodevelopmental disorders, typically ADHD[43], a definitive diagnosis of ADHD still requires confirmation by pediatric psychologists. Furthermore, the previously reported combination of ocular-motor-cognitive delays[44] may also the factor of increasing prevalence of parent ratings of ADHD symptoms among CC children, which would be further studied in our following research.

In conclusion, we found that bilateral CC children had a higher rate of psychological symptoms than NV children and exhibited a higher prevalence of ADHD symptoms. Timely screening and intervention for ADHD are required in bilateral CC children to prevent dual impairments of both vision and mental health through a joint effort by parents, pediatric ophthalmologists, and psychologists.


ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Foundations: Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.81770967; No.91546101); National Key R&D Program (No.2018YFC0116500); the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No.18ykpy33; No.16ykjc28); the Youth Pearl River Scholar Funded Scheme (2016-2018); the Fundamental Research Funds of the State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology (2018-2019).

Conflicts of Interest: Lin ZL, None; Lin DR, None; Chen JJ, None; Li J, None; Li XY, None; Wang LS, None; Liu ZZ, None; Cao QZ, None; Chen C, None; Zhu Y, None; Chen WR, None; Liu YZ, None; Lin HT, None. 


REFERENCES

1 DeCarlo DK, Swanson M, McGwin G, Visscher K, Owsley C. ADHD and vision problems in the national survey of children's health. Optom Vis Sci 2016;93(5):459-465.
https://doi.org/10.1097/OPX.0000000000000823
PMid:26855242 PMCid:PMC4840060

 

2 Grimm O, Kittel-Schneider S, Reif A. Recent developments in the genetics of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2018;72(9):654-672.
https://doi.org/10.1111/pcn.12673
PMid:29722101

 

3 Gonen-Yaacovi G, Arazi A, Shahar N, Karmon A, Haar S, Meiran N, Dinstein I. Increased ongoing neural variability in ADHD. Cortex 2016;81:50-63.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2016.04.010
PMid:27179150

 

4 Millichap JG, Millichap JJ. Causative factors for ADHD: perinatal risk factors. Pediatr Neurol Briefs 2014;28(8s):2.
https://doi.org/10.15844/pedneurbriefs-28-8s-1

 

5 Deater-Deckard K. Parents' and children's ADHD in a family system. J Abnorm Child Psychol 2017;45(3):519-525.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-017-0276-7
PMid:28181060

 

6 Gottfried AW, Gilman G. Visual skills and intellectual development: a relationship in young children. J Am Optom Assoc 1985;56(7):550-555.

 

7 Lin HT, Zhang L, Lin DR, Chen W, Zhu Y, Chen C, Chan KC, Liu YZ, Chen WR. Visual restoration after cataract surgery promotes functional and structural brain recovery. EBioMedicine 2018;30:52-61.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2018.03.002
PMid:29548900 PMCid:PMC5952227

 

8 Lin H, Ouyang H, Zhu J, et al. Lens regeneration using endogenous stem cells with gain of visual function. Nature 2016;531(7594): 323-328.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nature17181
PMid:26958831 PMCid:PMC6061995

 

9 Lin DR, Chen JJ, Liu ZZ, Wu XH, Long EP, Luo LX, Lin ZL, Li XY, Zhang L, Chen H, Liu JC, Chen WR, Lin HT, Liu YZ. Prevalence of corneal astigmatism and anterior segmental biometry characteristics before surgery in Chinese congenital cataract patients. Sci Rep 2016;6:22092.
https://doi.org/10.1038/srep22092
PMid:26912400 PMCid:PMC4766530

 

10 Lin DR, Chen JJ, Lin ZL, Li XY, Wu XH, Long EP, Luo LX, Zhang B, Chen H, Chen W, Zhang L, Lin HT, Chen WR, Liu YZ. 10-year overview of the hospital-based prevalence and treatment of congenital cataracts: the CCPMOH experience. PLoS One 2015;10(11):e0142298.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142298
PMid:26540510 PMCid:PMC4634994

 

11 Reimelt C, Wolff N, Hölling H, Mogwitz S, Ehrlich S, Roessner V. The underestimated role of refractive error (hyperopia, myopia, and astigmatism) and strabismus in children with ADHD. J Atten Disord 2018:1087054718808599.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1087054718808599
PMid:30371126

 

12 Grönlund MA, Aring E, Landgren M, Hellström A. Visual function and ocular features in children and adolescents with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, with and without treatment with stimulants. Eye (Lond) 2007;21(4):494-502.
https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.eye.6702240
PMid:16518370

 

13 Rouse M, Borsting E, Mitchell GL, Kulp MT, Scheiman M, Amster D, Coulter R, Fecho G, Gallaway M, CITT Study Group. Academic behaviors in children with convergence insufficiency with and without parent-reported ADHD. Optom Vis Sci 2009;86(10):1169-1177.
https://doi.org/10.1097/OPX.0b013e3181baad13
PMid:19741558 PMCid:PMC2888729

 

14 Borsting E, Rouse M, Chu R. Measuring ADHD behaviors in children with symptomatic accommodative dysfunction or convergence insufficiency: a preliminary study. Optometry 2005;76(10):588-592.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optm.2005.07.007
PMid:16230274

 

15 Saigh PA, Yasik AE, Halamandaris PV, Bremner JD, Oberfield RA. The parent ratings of traumatized children with or without PTSD. Psychol Trauma 2015;7(1):85-92.
https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037433
PMid:25793597 PMCid:PMC4667553

 

16 Oerbeck B, Overgaard KR, Pripp AH, Reichborn-Kjennerud T, Aase H, Zeiner P. Early predictors of ADHD: evidence from a prospective birth cohort. J Atten Disord 2017:1087054717696765.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1087054717696765
PMid:29254401

 

17 Conners CK, Sitarenios G, Parker JD, Epstein JN. The revised Conners' Parent Rating Scale (CPRS-R): factor structure, reliability, and criterion validity. J Abnorm Child Psychol 1998;26(4):257-268.
https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022602400621

 

18 CAPOS. Expert consensus of amblyopia diagnosis (2011). Chinese Journal of Ophthalmology 2011(47):768.

 

19 Egger RJ, Hofhuis EH, Bloem MW, Chusilp K, Wedel M, Intarakhao C, Saowakontha S, Schreurs WH. Association between intestinal parasitoses and nutritional status in 3-8-year-old children in northeast Thailand. Trop Geogr Med 1990;42(4):312-323.

 

20 Yang Y. Rating Scales for Children's Developmental Behavior and Mental Health. People's Medical Publishing House Press: Beijing, China, 2016.

 

21 Gardner F, Montgomery P, Knerr W. Transporting evidence-based parenting programs for child problem behavior (age 3-10) between countries: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol 2016;45(6):749-762.
https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2015.1015134
PMid:25785902

 

22 Elder JP, Pequegnat W, Ahmed S, et al. Caregiver behavior change for child survival and development in low- and middle-income countries: an examination of the evidence. J Health Commun 2014;19(Suppl 1):25-66.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2014.940477
PMid:25207447 PMCid:PMC4263266

 

23 Fan J, Du Y, Wang L. The norm and reliability of the Conners Parent Symptom Questionnaire in Chinese urban children. Shanghai Archives of Psychiatry 2005;17(6):321-323.

 

24 Omar R, Rahman MH, Knight VF, Mustaphal M, Mohammed Z. Mental health state and quality of life questionnaire in low vision assessment: a case report. BMC Res Notes 2014;7:667.
https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-7-667
PMid:25245590 PMCid:PMC4190380

 

25 Kutzbach B, Summers CG, Holleschau AM, King RA, MacDonald JT. The prevalence of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder among persons with albinism. J Child Neurol 2007;22(12):1342-1347.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0883073807307078
PMid:18174549

 

26 Daien V, Le Pape A, Heve D, Villain M, Bremond Gignac D; Collaborators of the Epidemiology and Safety Program (EPISAFE). Incidence and characteristics of congenital cataract surgery in France from 2010 to 2012: the EPISAFE program. Ophthalmic Res 2017;58(2):114-116.
https://doi.org/10.1159/000473701
PMid:28633137

 

27 Baddeley A. Exploring the central executive. The Q J Exp Psychol Sect A 1996;49(1):5-28.
https://doi.org/10.1080/713755608

 

28 Ye HH, Chen WR, Deng DM, Lin Z, Yang WH. Quality of life assessment in children with congenital bilateral cataract. Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi 2007;43(11):996-999.

 

29 Chak M, Rahi JS; British Congenital Cataract Interest Group. The health-related quality of life of children with congenital cataract: findings of the British Congenital Cataract Study. Br J Ophthalmol 2007;91(7):922-926.
https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.2006.109603
PMid:17244652 PMCid:PMC1955663

 

30 Tailor VK, Abou-Rayyah Y, Brookes J, Khaw PT, Papadopoulos M, Adams GGW, Bunce C, Dahlmann-Noor A. Quality of life and functional vision in children treated for cataract-a cross-sectional study. Eye (Lond) 2017;31(6):856-864.
https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2016.323
PMid:28128793 PMCid:PMC5518828

 

31 Knowles RL, Day T, Wade A, Bull C, Wren C, Dezateux C, UK Collaborative Study of Congenital Heart Defects (UKCSCHD). Patient-reported quality of life outcomes for children with serious congenital heart defects. Arch Dis Child 2014;99(5):413-419.
https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2013-305130
PMid:24406805 PMCid:PMC3995241

 

32 Varni JW, Burwinkle TM, Katz ER, Meeske K, Dickinson P. The PedsQL™ in pediatric cancer. Cancer 2002;94(7):2090-2106.
https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.10428
PMid:11932914

 

33 Fumeaux P, Mercier C, Roche S, Iwaz J, Stéphan P, Revol O. Validation of the French version of Conners' Parent Rating Scale-Revised, short form in ADHD-diagnosed children and comparison with control children. J Atten Disord 2018:1087054718763908.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1087054718763908
PMid:29562852

 

34 Whiteside SP, Lynam DR. The Five Factor Model and impulsivity: using a structural model of personality to understand impulsivity. Pers Individ Differ 2001;30(4):669-689.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(00)00064-7

 

35 Esteban A, Tabernero C. Relationship between impulsiveness and deviant behavior among adolescents in the classroom: age and sex differences. Psychol Rep 2011;109(3):703-717.
https://doi.org/10.2466/02.07.09.PR0.109.6.703-717
PMid:22420105

 

36 Abikoff HB, Jensen PS, Arnold LL, et al. Observed classroom behavior of children with ADHD: relationship to gender and comorbidity. J Abnorm Child Psychol 2002;30(4):349-359.
https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015713807297

 

37 Webber AL, Wood JM, Gole GA, Brown B. The effect of amblyopia on fine motor skills in children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2008;49(2):594-603.
https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.07-0869
PMid:18235004

 

38 Webber AL, Wood JM, Gole GA, Brown B. Effect of amblyopia on self-esteem in children. Optom Vis Sci 2008;85(11):1074-1081.
https://doi.org/10.1097/OPX.0b013e31818b9911
PMid:18981922

 

39 Goolam S, Carstens N, Ross M, Bentley D, Lopes M, Peden J, Kingsbury Z, Tsogka E, Barlow R, Carmichael TR, Ramsay M, Williams SE. Familial congenital cataract, coloboma, and nystagmus phenotype with variable expression caused by mutation in PAX6 in a South African family. Mol Vis 2018;24:407-413.

 

40 Lasky-Su J, Neale BM, Franke B, et al. Genome-wide association scan of quantitative traits for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder identifies novel associations and confirms candidate gene associations. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet 2008;147B(8):1345-1354.
https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.b.30867
PMid:18821565

 

41 Al-Owain M, Al-Zahrani J, Al-Bakheet A, et al. A novel syndrome of abnormal striatum and congenital cataract: evidence for linkage to chromosomes 11. Clin Genet 2013;84(3):258-264.
https://doi.org/10.1111/cge.12066
PMid:23181898

 

42 Neece CL, Green SA, Baker BL. Parenting stress and child behavior problems: a transactional relationship across time. Am J Intellect Dev Disabil 2012;117(1):48-66.
https://doi.org/10.1352/1944-7558-117.1.48
PMid:22264112 PMCid:PMC4861150

 

43 Marie G. The Conners Parent Rating scale: confirmatory factorial analysis on preliminary data in a sample of 5-10 years old Belgian French speaking children. Front Hum Neurosci 2012;6:34.
https://doi.org/10.3389/conf.fnhum.2012.210.00034

 

44 Kim HI, Kim SW, Kim J, Jeon HR, Jung DW. Motor and cognitive developmental profiles in children with down syndrome. Ann Rehabil Med 2017;41(1):97-103.
https://doi.org/10.5535/arm.2017.41.1.97
PMid:28289641 PMCid:PMC5344833