bannter.jpg

Citation: Lin H, Zhang J, Niu GZ, Huang XY, Zhang YS, Liu CY, Zheng CY, Bi YL. Phacoemulsification in eyes with corneal opacities after deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty. Int J Ophthalmol 2019;12(8):1344-1347. DOI:10.18240/ijo.2019.08.17


·
Brief Report·

Phacoemulsification in eyes with corneal opacities after deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty

Hui Lin, Juan Zhang, Guo-Zhen Niu, Xin-Yu Huang, Yu-Shan Zhang, Chun-Yu Liu, Chang-Yue Zheng, Yan-Long Bi

Department of Ophthalmology, Tongji Hospital Affiliated with Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200065, China

Co-first authors: Hui Lin and Juan Zhang

Correspondence to: Yan-Long Bi. Department of Ophthalmology, Tongji Hospital Affiliated with Tongji University School of Medicine, No.389 Xincun Road, Putuo District, Shanghai 200065, China. biyanlong@tongji.edu.cn

Received: 2018-06-14        Accepted: 2018-10-29

Abstract

To evaluate the maneuverability and efficacy of phacoemulsification and intraocular lens (IOL) implantation in eyes with corneal opacities after deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK), twelve eyes of 12 patients with mild to moderate corneal opacities after DALK and coexisting cataracts were analyzed retrospectively. Phacoemulsification and IOL implantation assisted with anterior capsule staining, as well as non-invasive optical fiber illumination, were performed on all eyes. No intraoperative or postoperative complications were noted. Mean corrected distance visual acuity (logMAR) improved from 1.24±0.17 to 0.73±0.22. Post-phaco intraocular pressure was maintained between 13 to 20 mm Hg in all cases throughout the follow-up period. Mean endothelial cell density decreased from 2258.42±205.94 to 1906.25±174.23 cells/mm2. Phacoemulsification and IOL implantation are safe and valid in eyes with mild to moderate corneal opacities after DALK and coexisting cataracts when assisted with anterior capsule staining and non-invasive optical fiber illumination.

KEYWORDS: phacoemulsification; corneal opacity; deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty; staining; illumination

DOI:10.18240/ijo.2019.08.17

Citation: Lin H, Zhang J, Niu GZ, Huang XY, Zhang YS, Liu CY, Zheng CY, Bi YL. Phacoemulsification in eyes with corneal opacities after deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty. Int J Ophthalmol 2019;12(8):1344-1347

introduction

Deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) that only replaces the diseased part of the cornea while preserving the recipient’s Descemet membrane and endothelium minimizes the complications of replacing the full-thickness cornea [penetrating keratoplasty (PK)][1-2]. Moreover, improvements in DALK techniques have also enhanced its usefulness for treatment of corneal disease in patients with non-compromised endothelium[3-4].

Although less than that associated with PK[5-6], the risk of recurrence and graft rejection episodes after DALK also exists, potentially leaving a mild to moderate corneal opacity. In modern China, keratoplasty still faces many challenges, including the large numbers of patients, a lack of corneal donors, and limited medical funding[7]. These challenges greatly reduce the chance of a patient receiving another keratoplasty after suffering a mild to moderate corneal opacity after the first procedure. In patients with coexisting cataracts, capsulorhexis and phacoemulsification are difficult because of poor visibility of the crystalline lens and anterior capsule[8]. The protection of the graft and endothelium should also be considered during operation.

Previous studies have shown that phacoemulsification after DALK is safe and provides an improvement in the visual acuity of eyes with transparent corneas[4,9-10]. But few studies are available on phacoemulsification in eyes with mild to moderate corneal opacities after DALK. To overcome above difficulties, we performed a non-invasive optical fiber illumination-assisted phacoemulsification and IOL implantation procedure in eyes with mild to moderate corneal opacities after DALK and the efficacy of the procedure was evaluated.


subjects and Methods

Ethical Approval  The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Tongji Hospital Affiliated with Tongji University School of Medicine. Informed consent was waived due to the retrospective nature of the study.

Subjects  This retrospective analysis comprised 12 eyes with mild to moderate corneal opacities after DALK that underwent optical fiber illumination-assisted phacoemulsification and IOL implantation by the same senior surgeon (Bi YL) between March 2013 and April 2017 in the Department of Ophthalmology, Tongji Hospital Affiliated with Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China. One eye with a preexisting posterior synechia was diagnosed with phacomorphic glaucoma during the follow-up period after DALK. Eyes with severe corneal opacities, active inflammation, lens dislocation, and fundus lesions were excluded.

Pre-phaco Examination  Corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) and slit-lamp microscopic examination were performed in all eyes. Intraocular pressure (IOP) was measured by a Tono-Pen (SW-500; SUOER, China). Endothelial cell density (ECD) was detected by confocal microscopy (Confoscan 3.0; NIDEK, Japan). The axial length was measured by partial coherence interferometry (PCI; IOLMaster 500; Carl Zeiss, Germany). Keratometry readings were obtained using corneal topography (ATLAS 9000; Carl Zeiss, Germany) and then manually inserted into the PCI device to determine the spherical IOL power using the SRK-T formula.

Surgical Technique  All operations were performed by the same senior surgeon (Bi YL) under retrobulbar anesthesia. Care was taken to avoid contact with the graft-host junction when making two corneoscleral limbus incisions. Through a 2.7 mm corneoscleral limbus incision, an air bubble was injected into the anterior chamber. Of 0.1% trypan blue was injected over the anterior capsule within the air bubble to improve visibility of the capsule and a viscoelastic substance was then used to maintain the anterior chamber (Figure 1A). Adjusting the surgical microscope to smaller aperture and higher coaxial illumination would provide a deeper depth of field, which can improve the distinguishability of the lens to some degree (Figure 1B). But in these cases, the above steps would not provide enough visibility for the subsequent procedure. Considering this, a non-invasive optical fiber used as the only light source to further enhance visibility. With an appropriate projection angle and distance, the lens can be observed clearly (Figure 1C). The continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis and hydrodissection were performed conventionally. Phacoemulsification was performed using a divide-and-conquer technique with a low vacuum and flow rate (Figure 1D). After the implantation of a foldable IOL and aspiration of the viscoelastic substance, the incisions were hydrated closed.

Hui Lin1

Figure 1 Microscope views taken during surgery, and the slit-lamp photo of the right eye of patient 1  A: After staining with 0.1% trypan blue, the anterior capsule was still indiscernible; B: The visibility improved slightly with a smaller aperture and higher coaxial illumination; C: A non-invasive optical fiber improved the visibility significantly; D: The position and projection angle of the optical fiber could be changed as needed; E: Four months after DALK, the eye with the preexisting posterior synechia presented cataract swelling, anterior chamber shallowing and sustained IOP elevation; F: Five months after phacoemulsification with lysis of the posterior synechia and goniosynechialysis, the graft was stable without edema.

Post-phaco Protocol  All eyes received levofloxacin 0.5%, TobraDex (tobramycin 0.3% and dexamethasone 0.1%) and pranoprofen 0.1% eye drops postoperatively, which were gradually tapered and then stopped after one month. Patients received follow-up regularly after discharge. CDVA, IOP, ECD, and slit-lamp microscopic examination accompanied each visit.

Statistical Analysis  Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 11.0. Data were shown as mean±SD. Comparisons between pre-phaco and post-phaco ECD were performed using a pared-samples t-test. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.


RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Twelve eyes of 12 patients were included in the study and the patient characteristics are shown in Table 1. The mean age was 61.33±5.76y. The mean interval between DALK and phacoemulsification was 13.50±3.48mo. For a final accurate prediction of IOL power, phacoemulsification was performed in all eyes after full suture removal[11] (at least 12mo after DALK; Figures 2-3), except for one eye (Figure 1E) with preexisting posterior synechia presenting phacomorphic glaucoma beyond the control of topical antiglaucoma medications during the follow-up period after DALK. The IOP in this eye maintained between 32 to 38 mm Hg with three medications (pilocarpine 0.5%, carteolol 2% and brimonidine 0.2% eye drops). Mannitol 20% given one-half hour before operation reduced IOP to 25 mm Hg and phacoemulsification with lysis of the posterior synechia and goniosynechialysis was performed four months after DALK. Post-phaco IOP of this eye maintained between 14 to 20 mm Hg without medications, and the graft was stable without edema (Figure 1F). Glaucoma is well recognized as an independent cause of keratoplasty failure[12-13], so the timing of surgery is crucial. One article reported a case in which phacoemulsification was performed four months after DALK and no intraoperative or postoperative complications were noted[4]. Likewise, the case in this study also suggests that phacoemulsification after DALK is safe with an interval of four months.

Table 1 Patient characteristics

Patient No./sex/age (y)

Reason for DALK

ECD (cells/mm2)

CDVA

Pre-phaco

Post-phacoa

Pre-phaco

Post-phacoa

1/M/54

Infective leucoma

2570

2114

20/500

20/100

2/F/70

Infective leucoma

2022

1687

20/667

20/200

3/M/61

Traumatic leucoma

2285

1907

20/500

20/200

4/M/58

Fungal keretitis

2334

2005

20/333

20/80

5/M/68

Mooren’s ulcer

2087

1733

20/200

20/50

6/F/64

Infective leucoma

2045

1721

20/250

20/133

7/M/52

Fungal keretitis

2642

2245

20/500

20/133

8/M/63

Infective leucoma

2125

1836

20/333

20/166

9/M/55

Fungal keretitis

2475

2084

20/250

20/66

10/M/58

Traumatic leucoma

2316

1968

20/250

20/80

11/M/69

Infective leucoma

2032

1699

20/200

20/50

12/M/64

Infective leucoma

2168

1876

20/500

20/200

DALK: Deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty; ECD: Endothelial cell density; CDVA: Corrected distance visual acuity. a12mo after phacoemulsification.

Hui Lin2

Figure 2 Pre-phaco and post-phaco slit-lamp photos of patient 5  A: Thirteen months after partial DALK; B: One month after phacoemulsification.

Hui Lin3

Figure 3 Pre-phaco and post-phaco slit-lamp photos of patient 11  A: Twelve months after DALK; B: One month after phacoemulsification.

Operations were uneventful in all cases. No complications were noted during or after phacoemulsification and IOL implantation. IOP maintained between 13 to 20 mm Hg in all cases throughout the follow-up period. The mean ECD decreased from 2258.42±205.94 to 1906.25±174.23 cells/mm2 (P<0.05). The mean CDVA (logMAR) improved from 1.24±0.17 to 0.73±0.22. In eyes with cataracts and coexisting corneal diseases, a triple procedure[14-15] and 2-stage procedure[4] are available. Although the triple procedure enables faster recovery and fewer follow-up visits, inaccuracy in IOL power prediction is a major drawback[15]. Moreover, the need for cataract surgery may emerge after keratoplasty in eyes with no preexisting lenticular changes or severe corneal opacity limiting the preoperative detection of cataracts. So, the 2-stage procedure is still required in many cases.

Performing phacoemulsification in eyes with preexisting corneal opacities is challenging because of poor visibility of the lens and anterior chamber. Anterior chamber endoillumination and transconjunctival chandelier retroillumination have reportedly been used in cataract surgery to enhance visibility[8,16]. But these procedures also have limits. Anterior chamber endoillumination occupies space in the anterior chamber and the position is inconvenient to change. Transconjunctival chandelier retroillumination used in vitreoretinal surgery may result in retinal phototoxicity[17-19]. In this study, a non-invasive optical fiber was used as the only light source to decrease the light scatter caused by corneal opacity and further enhance visibility. The non-invasive optical fiber does not need additional incisions and has smaller influence on the cornea, which is especially important in eyes after DALK. Further, it has better mobility and does not occupy the space of the anterior chamber, making anterior chamber manipulation progress more smoothly. The slant projection angle also reduces microscope-induced retinal phototoxicity[20-21].

After solving the problem of illumination, the other thing to be noticed is the protection of the graft and endothelium. Corneoscleral limbus incisions should avoid contact with the graft-host junction. Staining of the anterior capsule under an air bubble reduced contact between the dye and the corneal endothelium. Minimize movement of the tip to reduce its influence on the graft-host junction. A low vacuum and flow rate were required to decrease turbulence in the anterior chamber and to minimize the damage to the graft-host junction and endothelium. For safety, this technique should be performed in eyes with a nucleus up to grade (according to the Emery-Little classification), to decrease endothelial cell loss caused by high ultrasonic energy[14,22].

There were also some limitations in this study, such as the small sample size and the need for an assistant during the surgery. More appropriate cases will be comprised in the future. Moreover, the holder for the non-invasive optical fiber is in the design.

In conclusion, for patients with coexisting cataracts and mild to moderate corneal opacities after keratoplasty but who are unable to undergo another keratoplasty due to a lack of corneal donors or financial concerns, this study provided a safe and valid technique for enhancing their postoperative visual acuity to some extent and at lower cost.


ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Foundations: Supported by a Municipal Human Resources Development Program for Outstanding Leaders in Medical Disciplines in Shanghai (No.2017BR060); Shanghai Scientific and Technical Innovation Plan 2016 (No.16140900900).

Conflicts of Interest: Lin H, None; Zhang J, None; Niu GZ, None; Huang XY, None; Zhang YS, None; Liu CY, None; Zheng CY, None; Bi YL, None.


references

1 Feizi S, Javadi MA, Daryabari SH. Factors influencing big-bubble formation during deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty in keratoconus. Br J Ophthalmol 2016;100(5):622-625.
https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2015-307111
PMid:26311063

 

2 Chen G, Tzekov R, Li W, Jiang F, Mao S, Tong Y. Deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty versus penetrating keratoplasty: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Cornea 2016;35(2):169-174.
https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0000000000000691
PMid:26583281

 

3 Luengo-Gimeno F, Tan DT, Mehta JS. Evolution of deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK). Ocul Surf 2011;9(2):98-110.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1542-0124(11)70017-9

 

4 Leccisotti A, Islam T, McGilligan VE, Moore TC. Phacoemulsification after deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty. Eur J Ophthalmol 2010;20(4): 680-683.
https://doi.org/10.1177/112067211002000406
PMid:20155707

 

5 Wu SQ, Zhou P, Zhang B, Qiu WY, Yao YF. Long-term comparison of full-bed deep lamellar keratoplasty with penetrating keratoplasty in treating corneal leucoma caused by herpes simplex keratitis. Am J Ophthalmol 2012;153(2):291-299.e2.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2011.07.020
PMid:21996306

 

6 Akanda ZZ, Naeem A, Russell E, Belrose J, Si FF, Hodge WG. Graft rejection rate and graft failure rate of penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) vs lamellar procedures: a systematic review. PLoS One 2015;10(3):e0119934.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0119934
PMid:25781319 PMCid:PMC4362756

 

7 Hong J, Shi W, Liu Z, Pineda R, Cui X, Sun X, Xu J. Limitations of keratoplasty in china: a survey analysis. PLoS One 2015;10(7):e0132268.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132268
PMid:26161870 PMCid:PMC4498799

 

8 Oshima Y, Shima C, Maeda N, Tano Y. Chandelier retroillumination-assisted torsional oscillation for cataract surgery in patients with severe corneal opacity. J Cataract Refract Surg 2007;33(12):2018-2022.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.07.055
PMid:18053897

 

9 Acar BT, Utine CA, Acar S, Ciftci F. Endothelial cell loss after phacoemulsification in eyes with previous penetrating keratoplasty, previous deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty, or No previous surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 2011;37(11):2013-2017.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.05.033
PMid:21924864

 

10 Lockington D, Wang EF, Patel DV, Moore SP, McGhee CN. Effectiveness of cataract phacoemulsification with toric intraocular lenses in addressing astigmatism after keratoplasty. J Cataract Refract Surg 2014;40(12):2044-2049.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.03.025
PMid:25283612

 

11 Feizi S, Javadi MA, Behnaz N, Fani-Hanife S, Jafarinasab MR. Effect of suture removal on refraction and graft curvature after deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty in patients with keratoconus. Cornea 2018;37(1):39-44.
https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0000000000001443
PMid:29095753

 

12 Wandling GR Jr, Parikh M, Robinson C, Pramanik SN, Goins KM, Sutphin JE, Alward WL, Greenlee EC, Kwon YH, Wagoner MD. Escalation of glaucoma therapy after deep lamellar endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea 2010;29(9):991-995.
https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0b013e3181cc7b02
PMid:20520533

 

13 Musa FU, Patil S, Rafiq O, Galloway P, Ball J, Morrell A. Long-term risk of intraocular pressure elevation and glaucoma escalation after deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2012;40(8): 780-785.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-9071.2012.02796.x
PMid:22429901

 

14 Panda A, Sethi HS, Jain M, Nindra Krishna S, Gupta AK. Deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty with phacoemulsification. J Cataract Refract Surg 2011;37(1):122-126.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.07.031
PMid:21183107

 

15 Javadi MA, Feizi S, Moein HR. Simultaneous penetrating keratoplasty and cataract surgery. J Ophthalmic Vis Res 2013;8(1):39-46.

 

16 Srinivasan S, Kiire C, Lyall D. Chandelier anterior chamber endoillumination-assisted phacoemulsification in eyes with corneal opacities. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2013;41(5):515-517.
https://doi.org/10.1111/ceo.12037
PMid:23145577

 

17 Mathias MT, Oliver S, Olson J, et al. Retinal phototoxicity caused by chandelier endoillumination. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2010;51(13):3614.

 

18 van den Biesen PR, Berenschot T, Verdaasdonk RM, van Weelden H, van Norren D. Endoillumination during vitrectomy and phototoxicity thresholds. Br J Ophthalmol 2000;84(12):1372-1375.
https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.84.12.1372
PMid:11090475 PMCid:PMC1723343

 

19 Aydin B, Dinç E, Yilmaz SN, Altiparmak UE, Yülek F, Ertekin S, Yilmaz M, Yakın M. Retinal endoilluminator toxicity of xenon and light-emitting diode (LED) light source: rabbit model. Cutan Ocul Toxicol 2014;33(3):192-196.
https://doi.org/10.3109/15569527.2013.832282
PMid:24147949

 

20 Kleinmann G, Hoffman P, Schechtman E, Pollack A. Microscope-induced retinal phototoxicity in cataract surgery of short duration. Ophthalmology 2002;109(2):334-338.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0161-6420(01)00924-1

 

21 Cetinkaya A, Yilmaz G, Akova YA. Photic retinopathy after cataract surgery in diabetic patients. Retina 2006;26(9):1021-1028.
https://doi.org/10.1097/01.iae.0000254895.78766.af
PMid:17151489

 

22 Ataş M, Demircan S, Karatepe Haşhaş AS, Gülhan A, Zararsız G. Comparison of corneal endothelial changes following phacoemulsification with transversal and torsional phacoemulsification machines. almol 2014;7(5):822-827.
https://doi.org/10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2014.05.15