角膜瓣背面基质切削治疗LASIK术后屈光回退的安全性和有效性
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Safety and efficacy of undersurface ablation of the flap for regression after LASIK
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的:观察准分子激光角膜瓣背面基质切削(undersurface ablation of the flap, UAF)治疗LASIK术后屈光回退的安全性和有效性。

    方法:对12例22眼LASIK术后有屈光回退的患者进行角膜瓣背面基质切削,术前球镜度数平均为-2.27±0.88D,散光度数为-0.44±0.30D,中央角膜厚度平均为424.9±8.2μm,术后观察1a,随访检查包括术后视力、屈光不正度数、角膜后表面高度、波前像差仪等。采用t检验或χ2检验进行统计学处理。

    结果:术中测量角膜基质床厚度平均275.4±9.3μm; 角膜瓣厚度平均144.7±7.5μm,切削深度平均28.1±9.3μm。术后1a裸眼视力(uncorrected visual acuity, UCVA)4.99±0.04,最佳矫正视力(best corrected visual acuity, BCVA)5.03±0.04,BCVA相比术前无1例下降者。屈光不正球镜度数至术后1a时-0.22±0.19D,相比术前差异有统计学意义(t=10.232, P<0.001); 散光度数1a时-0.24±0.26D,与术前相比有统计学意义(t=2.365,P=0.028)。角膜后表面高度值术前1.95±1.68μm,术后1a 2.00±1.88μm,两者差异无统计学意义(t=0.090, P=0.929)。彗差由术前0.283±0.112μm变化到术后1a时0.331±0.149μm,两者差异无统计学意义(t=1.452, P=0.161); 球差由术前0.320±0.119μm变化到术后1a时0.341±0.103μm,两者差异无统计学意义(t=0.390, P=0.674)。

    结论:以合理的手术设计为基础,UAF治疗LASIK术后屈光回退是安全和有效的,可以作为一种治疗屈光回退的选择之一。

    Abstract:

    AIM: To investigate the safety and efficacy of undersurface ablation of the flap(UAF)for laser in situ keratomileusis(LASIK)retreatment in eyes with regression.

    METHODS: Twelve patients(22 eyes)with regression after LASIK were performed undersurface ablation of the flap. The mean of preoperative refractive error was -2.27±0.88D, the astigmatism was -0.44±0.30D, the central corneal thickness was 424.9±8.2μm. The follow-up time was 1a, including visual acuity, refractive error, the elevation of posterior cornea, WavScan. The data was analyzed with Student's t test and χ2 test.

    RESULTS:During the operation, the measured stromal thickness was 275.4±9.3μm, the flap thickness 144.7±7.5μm, the depth of ablation 28.1±9.3μm. The mean postoperative uncorrected visual acuity(UCVA)was 4.99±0.04, best corrected visual acuity(BCVA)5.03±0.04, at 1a follow up. There was no patient with postoperative BCVA decreasing, compared to preoperation. Mean spherical refraction decreased to -0.22±0.19 D at 1a follow up(t=10.232, P<0.001)and the astigmatism decreased to -0.24±0.26 D(t=2.365, P=0.028). The elevation of posterior cornea changed from 1.95±1.68μm preoperatively to 2.00±1.88μm after 1a, but there was no statistical significance(t=0.090, P=0.929). The coma changed from 0.283±0.112μm preoperatively to 0.331±0.149μm after 1a(no statistical significance, t=1.452, P=0.161)and the spherical aberration changed from 0.320±0.119μm to 0.341±0.103μm(no statistical significance, t=0.390, P=0.674).

    CONCLUSION:UAF, as one of a choice, is an effective and safe procedure for the treatment of regression after LASIK, based on the reasonable surgery design.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

龙克利,李甦雁.角膜瓣背面基质切削治疗LASIK术后屈光回退的安全性和有效性.国际眼科杂志, 2014,14(6):1119-1121.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2014-03-10
  • 最后修改日期:2014-04-25
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2014-05-22
  • 出版日期: