A超和IOL Master测量人工晶状体度数的差异性研究
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Study on the difference of A-scan and IOL Master in measuring intraocular lens power
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的:比较A超和IOL Master在人工晶状体度数测量方面的差异性。

    方法:选取226例230眼年龄相关性白内障患者,术前分别采用A超和IOL Master测量眼轴长度、自动验光仪测量角膜曲率,使用SRK-T公式计算需要植入的人工晶状体度数,术后3mo使用自动验光仪测量角膜曲率,用综合验光仪检查患者屈光状态并分析。

    结果:所有患眼使用A超和IOL Master测得的平均眼轴长度分别为23.48±1.94、23.75±1.96mm,两组数据对比差异有统计学意义(P<0.05); 随机分组后A超组术前平均角膜曲率为43.94±1.81D,术后为43.98±1.87D,两者比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),IOL Master组术前平均角膜曲率为44.10±1.57D,术后为44.11±1.58D,两者比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05); A超组和IOL Master组术后的平均绝对屈光误差(mean absolute refractive error,MAE)分别为0.47±0.27、0.41±0.19D,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。

    结论:IOL Master在人工晶状体度数测量中略优于A超测量。

    Abstract:

    AIM: To compare the difference of A-scan and IOL Master in intraocular lens power measurement.

    METHODS: Two hundred and twenty-six patients(230 eyes)with age-related cataract were included in the study. Before surgery, axial length was measured by A-scan and IOL Master respectively and corneal curvature was measured by auto refractometer. Intraocular lens power was calculated according to the SRK-T formula. Corneal curvature was measured by auto refractometer and the refractive outcome was performed by phoropter three months after cataract surgery.

    RESULTS: The mean axial length was(23.48±1.94)mm measured by A-scan and(23.75±1.96)mm measured by IOL Master. There was significant difference between them(P<0.05). After random grouping, the preoperative and postoperative mean corneal curvature in A-scan group was(43.94±1.81)D and(43.98±1.87)D respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between them(P>0.05). And the results were(44.10±1.57)D and(44.11±1.58)D in IOL Master group. There was no significant difference between them(P>0.05); The mean absolute refractive error(MAE)in A-scan group was(0.47±0.27)D and in IOL Master group(0.41±0.19)D. The difference was significant(P<0.05).

    CONCLUSION: IOL Master is proved to be slightly more accurate than A-scan for IOL power calculation.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

张茜,黄玥,叶竞英,等. A超和IOL Master测量人工晶状体度数的差异性研究.国际眼科杂志, 2016,16(10):1924-1926.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2016-06-17
  • 最后修改日期:2016-08-23
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2016-09-19
  • 出版日期: