曲安奈德与雷珠单抗辅助治疗弥漫性糖尿病性黄斑水肿的疗效比较
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

四川省中医药科学技术研究专项项目(No.2016C026)


Clinical efficacy of triamcinolone acetonide and Ranibizumab in the treatment of diabetic diffuse macular edema
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

Sichuan Provincial Science and Technology Research Project on Traditional Chinese Medicine(No.2016C026)

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的:对曲安奈德与雷珠单抗用于弥漫性糖尿病性黄斑水肿(DME)的临床疗效观察比较。

    方法:将2016-02/2017-05我院收治的84例弥漫性DME患者作为研究对象,遵循1:1的配对原则将患者分为Ⅰ、Ⅱ两组,两组均采用激光光凝手术治疗,Ⅰ组光凝术前予以曲安奈德辅助治疗,Ⅱ组术前予以雷珠单抗辅助治疗,对两组临床疗效作回顾性分析与比较。

    结果:Ⅱ组患者治疗后3mo临床总有效率为93%,高于Ⅰ组总有效率77%(χ2=4.981,P=0.025); 与治疗前相比,两组治疗后各时间段BCVA、CMT均得到明显改善(P<0.05); Ⅱ组治疗后1、3mo BCVA指标改善优于Ⅰ组(P<0.05); Ⅱ组治疗后1、3、6mo CMT改善更优于Ⅰ组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05); Ⅰ组与Ⅱ组不良反应发生率分别为17%、13%,差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.243,P=0.621)。两组均未发生视网膜脱落、眼内炎、白内障等严重的不良反应。

    结论:与曲安奈德相比较,雷珠单抗用于弥漫性DME的疗效更佳,具有较高的临床应用价值。

    Abstract:

    AIM:To compare the clinical curative effect of triamcinolone acetonide and Ranibizumab on diffuse diabetic macular edema(DME).

    METHODS: We collected 84 cases of patients with diffuse DME treated in our hospital from February 2016 to May 2017. According to 1:1 matching method, they were divided into Ⅰ, Ⅱ groups. They were all treated with laser photocoagulation. Preoperative auxiliary application of triamcinolone acetonide was given to Group Ⅰ, while Group Ⅱ received preoperative application of ranibizumab. After treatment, the efficacy of the two groups were analyzed and compared.

    RESULTS: The total clinical efficiency of Group Ⅱ at 3mo after treatment was 93%, higher than that of Group Ⅰ(77%; χ2=4.981, P=0.025). Compared with before treatment, BCVA and CMT of the two groups at each time after treatment were significantly improved(P<0.05). BCVA of Group Ⅱ at 1 and 3mo after treatment was better than that of Group Ⅰ(P<0.05); CMT of Group Ⅱ at 1, 3 and 6mo after treatment improved more than that of Group Ⅰ, with significant difference(P<0.05); occurrence rate of adverse reactions Group Ⅰ and Group Ⅱ were 17% and 13% with no significant statistical difference(χ2=0.243, P=0.621). There were no serious adverse reactions such as retinal detachment, endophthalmitis or cataract in the two groups.

    CONCLUSION: Compared with triamcinolone acetonide, the effect of ranibizumab on diffuse diabetic macular edema is better, and has high clinical value.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

谢碧华,何宇,辛梅,等.曲安奈德与雷珠单抗辅助治疗弥漫性糖尿病性黄斑水肿的疗效比较.国际眼科杂志, 2018,18(6):1089-1092.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2018-01-03
  • 最后修改日期:2018-05-08
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2018-05-25
  • 出版日期: