Citation:Ye PP,Li X,Yao K.Visual outcome and optical quality after bilateral implantation of aspheric diffractive multifocal, aspheric monofocal and spherical monofocal intraocular lenses:a prospective comparison.Int J Ophthalmol 2013;6(3):300-306,doi:10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2013.03.08
Visual outcome and optical quality after bilateral implantation of aspheric diffractive multifocal, aspheric monofocal and spherical monofocal intraocular lenses:a prospective comparison
Received: December 05, 2012  Revised: April 22, 2013
Email this Article  Add to Favorites  Print
DOI:10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2013.03.08
Key Words:intraocular lens  aberration  visual acuity  multifocal
Fund Project:Zhejiang Key Innovation Team Project (No. 2009R50039); Doctoral Fund of Ministry of Education of China (No:20100101120135); Key Lab Fund of Zhejiang Province, China (No. 2011E10006)
AuthorInstitution
Pan-Pan Ye Eye Center, the Second Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 3100009, Zhejiang Province, China 
Xia Li Eye Center, the Second Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 3100009, Zhejiang Province, China 
Ke Yao Eye Center, the Second Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 3100009, Zhejiang Province, China 
Hits: 482
Download times: 377
Abstract:
      AIM:To evaluate the visual function after bilateral implantation of aspheric diffractive multifocal Tecnis ZMA00, aspheric monofocal ZA9003 versus spherical monofocal Akreos Adapt intraocular lenses (IOLs).

    METHODS:Tecnis ZMA00, Tecnis ZA9003 or Akreos Adapt IOLs were bilaterally implanted in 180 eyes from 90 patients. The following parameters were assessed 3 months postoperatively:monocular and binocular uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) and distance-corrected visual acuity (DCVA) for distance, intermediate and near, spherical aberration (SA), contrast and glare sensitivity, near point refractive power, uncorrected and best-corrected near stereoscopic acuity (NSA). Patient satisfaction was assessed by a questionnaire.

    RESULTS:Three months postoperatively, the monocular and binocular UCVA and DCVA at near of Tecnis ZMA00 were significantly better than other two groups. The mean SA for 5.0mm optical zone in Tecnis ZMA00 and Tecnis ZA9003 was significantly lower than that in Akreos Adapt. Mean contrast sensitivity and glare sensitivity were better for Tecnis ZA9003 group than for other two groups. Patients with Tecnis ZMA00 had higher monocular and binocular near point refractive power and uncorrected NSA than monofocal groups. The patients in Tecnis ZMA00 had higher mean values for halo compared with other two groups.

    CONCLUSION:Tecnis ZMA00 provided better near VA and uncorrected NSA and higher near point refractive power than monofocal IOLs and patients were spectacle independent. The IOLs with Tecnis aspheric design improved contrast and glare sensitivity. Patients with Tecnis ZMA00 reported more disturbances on visual phenomena of halo.

PMC FullText Html:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3693009/
View Fulltext  View/Add Comment  Download reader