Citation:Balikoglu-Yilmaz M,Yilmaz T,Cetinel S,Taskin U,Esen AB,Taskapili M,Kose T.Comparison of scanning electron microscopy findings regarding biofilm colonization with microbiological results in nasolacrimal stents for external, endoscopic and transcanalicular dacryocystorhinostomy.Int J Ophthalmol 2014;7(3):534-540,doi:10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2014.03.27
Comparison of scanning electron microscopy findings regarding biofilm colonization with microbiological results in nasolacrimal stents for external, endoscopic and transcanalicular dacryocystorhinostomy
Received:June 03, 2013  Revised:September 26, 2013
Email this Article  Add to Favorites  Print
DOI:10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2014.03.27
Key Words:biofilms  nasolacrimal duct obstruction  epiphora  dacryocystitis  scanning electron microscopy
Fund Project:Supported by Institutional Review Board of Bagcilar Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey (No.1852)
Conflicts of Interest: Balikoglu-Yilmaz M, None; Yilmaz T, None; Cetinel S, None; Taskin U, None; Esen AB, None; Taskapili M, None; Kose T, None.
                    
AuthorInstitution
Melike Balikoglu-Yilmaz Department of Ophthalmology, Bagcilar Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul 34200, Turkey
Tolga Yilmaz Department of Ophthalmology, Bagcilar Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul 34200, Turkey
Sule Cetinel Department of Histology&Embryology, Marmara University, Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul 34854, Turkey
Umit Taskin Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Bagcilar Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul 34200, Turkey
Ayse Banu Esen Department of Microbiology and Clinical Microbiology, Bagcilar Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul 34200, Turkey
Muhittin Taskapili Department of Ophthalmology, Bagcilar Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul 34200, Turkey
Timur Kose Department of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, Ege University, Faculty of Medicine, Izmir 35100, Turkey
Hits: 1350
Download times: 352
Abstract:
      AIM:To compare bacterial biofilm colonization in lacrimal stents following external dacryocystorhinostomy (EX-DCR), endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (EN-DCR), and transcanalicular dacryocystorhinostomy (TC-DCR) with multidiode laser.

    METHODS: This prospective study included 30 consecutive patients with nasolacrimal duct obstruction who underwent EXT-, EN-, or TC-DCR. Thirty removed lacrimal stent fragments and conjunctival samples were cultured. The lacrimal stent biofilms were examined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM).

    RESULTS:Eleven (36.7%) of the 30 lacrimal stent cultures were positive for aerobic bacteria (most commonly Staphylococcus epidermidis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa). However anaerobic bacteria and fungi were not identified in the lacrimal stent cultures. Twenty-seven (90%) patients had biofilm-positive lacrimal stents. The conjunctival culture positivity after the DCR, biofilm positivity on stents, the grade of biofilm colonization, and the presence of mucus and coccoid and rod-shaped organisms did not significantly differ between any of the groups (P>0.05). However, a significant difference was found when the SEM results were compared to the results of the lacrimal stent and conjunctival cultures (P<0.001).

    CONCLUSION: Type of dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) surgery did not affect the biofilm colonization of the lacrimal stents. SEM also appears to be more precise than microbiological culture for evaluating the presence of biofilms on lacrimal stents.

Supplementary Material
PDF Fulltext  Download reader  View/Add Comment