Corneal biomechanical data and biometric parameters measured with Scheimpflug-based devices on normal corneas
Author:
Contact Author:

Gabor Nemeth. Department of Ophthalmology, University of Debrecen, Nagyerdei blvd. 98, Debrecen H-4012, Hungary. nemeth222@yahoo.com

Affiliation:

Clc Number:

Fund Project:

  • Article
  • |
  • Figures
  • |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference
  • |
  • Related
  • |
  • Cited by
  • |
  • Materials
  • |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    AIM: To analyze the correlations between ocular biomechanical and biometric data of the eye, measured by Scheimpflug-based devices on healthy subjects. METHODS: Three consecutive measurements were carried out using the corneal visualization Scheimpflug technology (CorVis ST) device on healthy eyes and the 10 device-specific parameters were recorded. Pentacam HR-derived parameters (corneal curvature radii on the anterior and posterior surfaces; apical pachymetry; corneal volume; corneal aberration data; depth, volume and angle of the anterior chamber) and axial length (AL) from IOLMaster were correlated with the 10 specific CorVis ST parameters. RESULTS: Measurements were conducted in 43 eyes of 43 volunteers (age 61.24±15.72y). The 10 specific CorVis ST data showed significant relationships with corneal curvature radii both on the anterior and posterior surface, pachymetric data, root mean square (RMS) data of lower-order aberrations, and posterior RMS of higher-order aberrations and spherical aberration of the posterior cornea. Anterior chamber depth showed a significant relationship, but there were no significant correlations between corneal volume, anterior chamber volume, mean chamber angle or AL and the 10 specific CorVis ST parameters.

    Reference
    Related
    Cited by
Get Citation

Gabor Nemeth, Eszter Szalai, Ziad Hassan, et al. Corneal biomechanical data and biometric parameters measured with Scheimpflug-based devices on normal corneas. Int J Ophthalmol, 2017,10(2):217-222

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:
  • PDF:
  • HTML:
  • Cited by:
History
  • Received:March 10,2016
  • Revised:September 27,2016
  • Adopted:
  • Online: February 10,2017
  • Published: